Lindson Nicola, Livingstone-Banks Jonathan, Butler Ailsa R, Levy David T, Barnett Phoebe, Theodoulou Annika, Notley Caitlin, Rigotti Nancy A, Chen Yixian, Hartmann-Boyce Jamie
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown University-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Addiction. 2025 Apr;120(4):770-778. doi: 10.1111/add.16736. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
To determine patterns of e-cigarette flavour use (sweet, tobacco, menthol/mint) in interventional studies of e-cigarettes for stopping smoking, and to estimate associations between flavours and smoking/vaping outcomes.
Update of secondary data analyses, including meta-analyses subgrouped by flavour provision and narrative syntheses, incorporating data from January 2004 to February 2024. Eligible studies were identified from a Cochrane review. Studies provided adults who smoked cigarettes with nicotine-containing e-cigarettes for smoking cessation and provided data on e-cigarette e-liquid flavour use. Outcomes included participants' flavour use measured at any time, plus smoking abstinence, abstinence from all tobacco or commercial nicotine products and allocated product use at 6 months or longer, reported as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 1 tool.
We included 25 studies (n = 16 748); 21 contributed to subgroup meta-analyses and 18 provided flavour choices. We judged 15 studies at high, seven at low and three at unclear risk of bias. In studies where participants had a choice of flavours, some switching between flavours occurred (five studies). A preference for sweet (including fruit) flavours over tobacco and menthol was indicated (in 6 of 11 studies); however, there were differences across studies. Subgroup meta-analyses showed no clear associations between e-liquid flavours provided and smoking cessation or study product use. One included study randomised participants to two different flavour conditions and found similar cessation rates and long-term e-cigarette use between arms at 12 months.
Some people using e-cigarettes to quit smoking switch between e-cigarette flavours during a quit attempt. Sweet flavours may be preferred overall, but this may differ depending on context. Based on intervention studies, there is no clear association between the use of e-cigarette flavours and smoking cessation or longer-term e-cigarette use, possibly due to a paucity of data.
确定在电子烟戒烟干预研究中电子烟口味的使用模式(甜味、烟草味、薄荷醇/薄荷味),并评估口味与吸烟/吸电子烟结果之间的关联。
对二次数据分析进行更新,包括按口味提供情况进行亚组分析的荟萃分析和叙述性综合分析,纳入2004年1月至2024年2月的数据。从Cochrane系统评价中识别符合条件的研究。研究为吸烟的成年人提供含尼古丁的电子烟用于戒烟,并提供有关电子烟烟液口味使用的数据。结果包括参与者在任何时间测量的口味使用情况,以及戒烟、戒除所有烟草或商业尼古丁产品情况,以及6个月或更长时间的指定产品使用情况,报告为风险比及95%置信区间。我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险1工具评估偏倚风险。
我们纳入了25项研究(n = 16748);21项为亚组荟萃分析做出了贡献,18项提供了口味选择。我们判定15项研究偏倚风险高,7项偏倚风险低,3项偏倚风险不明确。在参与者可以选择口味的研究中,出现了一些口味之间的转换(5项研究)。表明相较于烟草味和薄荷味,对甜味(包括水果味)口味有偏好(11项研究中的6项);然而,不同研究之间存在差异。亚组荟萃分析显示,提供的电子烟烟液口味与戒烟或研究产品使用之间没有明确关联。一项纳入研究将参与者随机分配到两种不同的口味条件下,发现两组在12个月时的戒烟率和长期电子烟使用率相似。
一些使用电子烟戒烟的人在戒烟尝试期间会在电子烟口味之间转换。总体上甜味口味可能更受青睐,但这可能因情况而异。基于干预研究,电子烟口味的使用与戒烟或长期使用电子烟之间没有明确关联,可能是由于数据不足。