• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估人工智能(AI)对各临床环境下临床文档效率和准确性的影响:一项范围综述

Evaluating the Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Clinical Documentation Efficiency and Accuracy Across Clinical Settings: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Lee Craig, Britto Shawn, Diwan Khaled

机构信息

General Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Nov 19;16(11):e73994. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73994. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.73994
PMID:39703286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11658896/
Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies (natural language processing (NLP), speech recognition (SR), and machine learning (ML)) can transform clinical documentation in healthcare. This scoping review evaluates the impact of AI on the accuracy and efficiency of clinical documentation across various clinical settings (hospital wards, emergency departments, and outpatient clinics). We found 176 articles by applying a specific search string on Ovid. To ensure a more comprehensive search process, we also performed manual searches on PubMed and BMJ, examining any relevant references we encountered. In this way, we were able to add 46 more articles, resulting in 222 articles in total. After removing duplicates, 208 articles were screened. This led to the inclusion of 36 studies. We were mostly interested in articles discussing the impact of AI technologies, such as NLP, ML, and SR, and their accuracy and efficiency in clinical documentation. To ensure that our research reflected recent work, we focused our efforts on studies published in 2019 and beyond. This criterion was pilot-tested beforehand and necessary adjustments were made. After comparing screened articles independently, we ensured inter-rater reliability (Cohen's kappa=1.0), and data extraction was completed on these 36 articles. We conducted this study according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. This scoping review shows improvements in clinical documentation using AI technologies, with an emphasis on accuracy and efficiency. There was a reduction in clinician workload, with the streamlining of the documentation processes. Subsequently, doctors also had more time for patient care. However, these articles also raised various challenges surrounding the use of AI in clinical settings. These challenges included the management of errors, legal liability, and integration of AI with electronic health records (EHRs). There were also some ethical concerns regarding the use of AI with patient data. AI shows massive potential for improving the day-to-day work life of doctors across various clinical settings. However, more research is needed to address the many challenges associated with its use. Studies demonstrate improved accuracy and efficiency in clinical documentation with the use of AI. With better regulatory frameworks, implementation, and research, AI can significantly reduce the burden placed on doctors by documentation.

摘要

人工智能(AI)技术(自然语言处理(NLP)、语音识别(SR)和机器学习(ML))可以改变医疗保健中的临床文档。本范围综述评估了AI对各种临床环境(医院病房、急诊科和门诊诊所)中临床文档的准确性和效率的影响。我们通过在Ovid上应用特定的搜索字符串找到了176篇文章。为确保搜索过程更加全面,我们还在PubMed和BMJ上进行了手动搜索,检查我们遇到的任何相关参考文献。通过这种方式,我们又增加了46篇文章,总共达到222篇文章。去除重复项后,筛选了208篇文章。这导致纳入了36项研究。我们主要关注讨论AI技术(如NLP、ML和SR)的影响及其在临床文档中的准确性和效率的文章。为确保我们的研究反映最新的工作,我们将重点放在2019年及以后发表的研究上。该标准事先进行了预测试并进行了必要的调整。在独立比较筛选出的文章后,我们确保了评分者间的可靠性(Cohen's kappa = 1.0),并对这36篇文章完成了数据提取。我们根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行了这项研究。本范围综述显示,使用AI技术可改善临床文档,重点在于准确性和效率。临床医生的工作量有所减少,文档流程得到了简化。随后,医生也有更多时间用于患者护理。然而,这些文章也提出了在临床环境中使用AI的各种挑战。这些挑战包括错误管理、法律责任以及AI与电子健康记录(EHR)的整合。在使用AI处理患者数据方面也存在一些伦理问题。AI在改善各种临床环境中医生的日常工作生活方面显示出巨大潜力。然而,需要更多研究来应对与其使用相关的诸多挑战。研究表明,使用AI可提高临床文档的准确性和效率。通过更好的监管框架、实施和研究,AI可以显著减轻文档给医生带来的负担。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea88/11658896/3d1f00e88298/cureus-0016-00000073994-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea88/11658896/2dc0835dfa3a/cureus-0016-00000073994-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea88/11658896/3d1f00e88298/cureus-0016-00000073994-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea88/11658896/2dc0835dfa3a/cureus-0016-00000073994-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea88/11658896/3d1f00e88298/cureus-0016-00000073994-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Clinical Documentation Efficiency and Accuracy Across Clinical Settings: A Scoping Review.评估人工智能(AI)对各临床环境下临床文档效率和准确性的影响:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2024 Nov 19;16(11):e73994. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73994. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Shared Decision Making: Scoping Review.人工智能在共同决策中的应用:范围综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Aug 9;10(8):e36199. doi: 10.2196/36199.
3
Artificial intelligence technologies and compassion in healthcare: A systematic scoping review.医疗保健中的人工智能技术与人文关怀:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 17;13:971044. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971044. eCollection 2022.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Barriers to and facilitators of clinician acceptance and use of artificial intelligence in healthcare settings: a scoping review.医疗环境中临床医生接受和使用人工智能的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 15;15(4):e092624. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092624.
6
The Role of Artificial Intelligence Model Documentation in Translational Science: Scoping Review.人工智能模型文档在转化科学中的作用:范围综述
Interact J Med Res. 2023 Jul 14;12:e45903. doi: 10.2196/45903.
7
Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection and its health technology assessment: A scoping review.用于乳腺癌检测的人工智能及其健康技术评估:一项范围综述。
Comput Biol Med. 2025 Jan;184:109391. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109391. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
8
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Health Equity in Oncology: Scoping Review.人工智能对肿瘤学中健康公平性的影响:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 1;24(11):e39748. doi: 10.2196/39748.
9
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Community-Based Primary Health Care: Systematic Scoping Review and Critical Appraisal.人工智能在社区基层医疗中的应用:系统范围综述和批判性评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 3;23(9):e29839. doi: 10.2196/29839.
10
The Role of Large Language Models in Transforming Emergency Medicine: Scoping Review.大型语言模型在变革急诊医学中的作用:范围综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 May 10;12:e53787. doi: 10.2196/53787.

引用本文的文献

1
Transforming Cancer Care: A Narrative Review on Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Advance Immunotherapy in Underserved Communities.变革癌症护理:关于利用人工智能推进服务不足社区免疫治疗的叙述性综述。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 29;14(15):5346. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155346.
2
Artificial intelligence in pediatric healthcare: current applications, potential, and implementation considerations.人工智能在儿科医疗保健中的应用:当前应用、潜力及实施考量
Clin Exp Pediatr. 2025 Sep;68(9):641-651. doi: 10.3345/cep.2025.00962. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
3
AIFM-ed Curriculum Framework for Postgraduate Family Medicine Education on Artificial Intelligence: Mixed Methods Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Multimodal Machine Learning in Image-Based and Clinical Biomedicine: Survey and Prospects.基于图像和临床生物医学的多模态机器学习:综述与展望
Int J Comput Vis. 2024;132(9):3753-3769. doi: 10.1007/s11263-024-02032-8. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
2
The application of large language models in medicine: A scoping review.大语言模型在医学中的应用:一项范围综述。
iScience. 2024 Apr 23;27(5):109713. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109713. eCollection 2024 May 17.
3
Patient-Friendly Discharge Summaries in Korea Based on ChatGPT: Software Development and Validation.
人工智能在研究生家庭医学教育中的AIFM-ed课程框架:混合方法研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Apr 25;11:e66828. doi: 10.2196/66828.
韩国基于 ChatGPT 的患者友好型出院小结:软件开发与验证。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Apr 29;39(16):e148. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e148.
4
Using ChatGPT-4 to Create Structured Medical Notes From Audio Recordings of Physician-Patient Encounters: Comparative Study.利用 ChatGPT-4 从医患对话的音频记录中创建结构化的医疗记录:比较研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 22;26:e54419. doi: 10.2196/54419.
5
Large language models for reducing clinicians' documentation burden.用于减轻临床医生文档负担的大语言模型。
Nat Med. 2024 Apr;30(4):942-943. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02888-w.
6
Exploring the potential of ChatGPT in medical dialogue summarization: a study on consistency with human preferences.探索 ChatGPT 在医学对话总结中的潜力:一项关于与人类偏好一致性的研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Mar 14;24(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02481-8.
7
Generative Artificial Intelligence to Transform Inpatient Discharge Summaries to Patient-Friendly Language and Format.生成式人工智能将住院病历摘要转换为患者友好型语言和格式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e240357. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0357.
8
Adapted large language models can outperform medical experts in clinical text summarization.经过改编的大型语言模型在临床文本总结方面的表现优于医学专家。
Nat Med. 2024 Apr;30(4):1134-1142. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02855-5. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
9
Technology in Medicine: Improving Clinical Documentation.医学技术:改善临床文档。
FP Essent. 2024 Feb;537:26-38.
10
[Clinical application of large language models : Does ChatGPT replace medical report formulation? An experience report].[大语言模型的临床应用:ChatGPT是否会取代医学报告撰写?一份经验报告]
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2023 Nov;64(11):1058-1064. doi: 10.1007/s00108-023-01600-3. Epub 2023 Oct 16.