Uzoigwe Chika Edward, Bin Qadir Rana Muhammad Anss, Daoub Ahmed
Harcourt House, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 20;19(12):e0315824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315824. eCollection 2024.
There is increasing awareness of the deleterious effects of ambient pollution. The World Health Organisation (WHO) has recently advocated new safe limits of annual exposure for the three pre-dominant pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5), coarse particulate matter (PM10) and nitrogen dioxide; namely 5μg/m3, 15μg/m3 and 10gμ/m3 respectively. Both the USA and UK have recently implemented news standards which are lower than their current values, but still exceed those espoused by WHO. The WHO thresholds are challenging targets. It remains to be determined the proportion of secondary healthcare institutions located in zones with mean ambient pollutant levels in excess of the WHO limits and the impact this has on patients treated at these centres. This is particularly so for elderly patients who are theoretically most vulnerable to the adverse sequel of pollutant exposure. Using the UK National Hip Fracture Database and Defra Data (Department of Environmental, Food & Rural Affairs) we determined the annual mean PM2.5 PM10 and nitrogen dioxide exposure for all the units treating senescent hip fracture patients. We correlated these ambient pollutant levels with all-cause 30-day mortality and incidence of post-operative delirium for hip fracture patients. The vast majority (96%) of hip fracture units were located in zones where mean PM2.5 levels exceeded that required by the WHO guidance. A sizeable proportion also had annual mean exposures that surpassed the WHO PM10 (14.8%) and nitrogen dioxide (63%) recommended thresholds. There was no difference in 30-day mortality between hip fracture patients treated at units located in areas where pollutant titres were subliminal to the WHO guidance levels and those treated at centres where WHO thresholds were exceeded. By way of contrast patients admitted to institutions with mean ambient PM10 and nitrogen dioxide concentrations that surpassed the WHO limits had a lower risk of post-operative delirium compared to those at centres where the mean levels did not breach the WHO limit. For PM10 the relative risk was 0.89 CI:0.82-0.92 (p<0.0001) and that for nitrogen dioxide 0.92 CI: 0.89-0.94 (p<0.0001). The WHO target is ambitious as it relates to healthcare institutions. The majority are in areas that exceed WHO recommended limits. This does not appear to impact upon mortality for hip fracture patients. The decrease in incidence in post-operative delirium in areas of higher exposure raises, again in an epidemiological study, the possibility of the enigmatic phenomenon of hormesis, an adaptive response whereby low-dose exposure to a noxious agent or physiological stress enhances future physiological function.
人们越来越意识到环境污染的有害影响。世界卫生组织(WHO)最近倡导了三种主要污染物的年度安全暴露新限值:细颗粒物(PM2.5)、粗颗粒物(PM10)和二氧化氮;分别为5μg/m³、15μg/m³和10μg/m³。美国和英国最近都实施了低于当前值的新标准,但仍超过了WHO所支持的标准。WHO的阈值是具有挑战性的目标。位于平均环境污染物水平超过WHO限值区域的二级医疗机构的比例以及这对这些中心治疗的患者的影响仍有待确定。对于理论上最易受污染物暴露不良后果影响的老年患者来说尤其如此。利用英国国家髋部骨折数据库和环境、食品与农村事务部(Defra)的数据,我们确定了所有治疗老年髋部骨折患者的单位的年度平均PM2.5、PM10和二氧化氮暴露量。我们将这些环境污染物水平与髋部骨折患者的全因30天死亡率和术后谵妄发生率进行了关联。绝大多数(96%)髋部骨折治疗单位位于平均PM2.5水平超过WHO指南要求的区域。相当一部分单位的年度平均暴露量也超过了WHO推荐的PM10(14.8%)和二氧化氮(63%)阈值。在污染物浓度低于WHO指南水平的区域接受治疗的髋部骨折患者与在超过WHO阈值的中心接受治疗的患者之间,30天死亡率没有差异。相比之下,与平均水平未突破WHO限值的中心的患者相比,入住平均环境PM10和二氧化氮浓度超过WHO限值的机构的患者术后谵妄风险较低。对于PM10,相对风险为0.89,置信区间:0.82 - 0.92(p<0.0001),对于二氧化氮为0.92,置信区间:0.89 - 0.94(p<0.0001)。WHO的目标对于医疗机构来说是雄心勃勃的。大多数医疗机构所在地区超过了WHO推荐的限值。这似乎并未影响髋部骨折患者的死亡率。在暴露水平较高地区术后谵妄发生率的降低,在一项流行病学研究中再次提出了兴奋效应这一神秘现象的可能性,兴奋效应是一种适应性反应,即低剂量接触有害剂或生理应激会增强未来的生理功能。