Kausche Franziska M, Carsten Hannes P, Sobania Kim M, Riesel Anja
Department of Psychology, University Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Psychology, University Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2025 Feb;169:105983. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105983. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
Fear learning processes are believed to play a crucial role in the development and maintenance of anxiety and stress-related disorders. To integrate results across different studies, we conducted a systematic meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines to examine differences in fear conditioning during fear acquisition, extinction, and extinction recall between individuals with anxiety-related or stress-related disorders and healthy participants. This analysis updates the work of Duits et al. (2015) while also refining distinctions between physiological and behavioral outcomes and examining extinction recall. Our meta-analysis encompasses 77 studies published from 1986 to 2022, involving 2052 patients with anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, or post-traumatic stress disorder, and 3258 healthy controls. The results indicate significant differences in fear acquisition, extinction, and recall between the two groups. Specifically, during acquisition patients exhibited heightened physiological and behavioral responses to the CS- and reported increased affect ratings for the CS+ . During extinction and extinction recall, patients continue to show heightened threat expectancy and negative affect ratings towards the CS- and increased affect ratings towards the CS+ . No differences were found in CS+ /CS- differentiation between groups. These findings imply that individuals with anxiety and stress-related disorders may exhibit amplified responses to safety cues and stronger reactions to threat cues during fear conditioning, lasting through extinction and extinction recall. These changes may lead to increased sensitivity in detecting fear and slower extinction process, resulting in more enduring anxiety responses. We discuss these results in the context of existing literature on fear and safety learning and consider potential underlying mechanisms.
恐惧学习过程被认为在焦虑和应激相关障碍的发展与维持中起着关键作用。为整合不同研究的结果,我们按照PRISMA指南进行了一项系统的荟萃分析,以检验患有焦虑相关或应激相关障碍的个体与健康参与者在恐惧习得、消退及消退回忆过程中恐惧条件反射的差异。该分析更新了Duits等人(2015年)的研究工作,同时细化了生理和行为结果之间的区别,并考察了消退回忆。我们的荟萃分析涵盖了1986年至2022年发表的77项研究,涉及2052名患有焦虑症、强迫症或创伤后应激障碍的患者以及3258名健康对照者。结果表明两组在恐惧习得、消退和回忆方面存在显著差异。具体而言,在习得过程中,患者对条件刺激阴性(CS-)表现出更高的生理和行为反应,并报告对条件刺激阳性(CS+)的情感评分增加。在消退和消退回忆过程中,患者对CS-继续表现出更高的威胁预期和负面情感评分,对CS+的情感评分增加。两组在CS+/CS-辨别方面未发现差异。这些发现意味着患有焦虑和应激相关障碍的个体在恐惧条件反射过程中可能对安全线索表现出放大的反应,对威胁线索表现出更强的反应,这种反应持续到消退和消退回忆阶段。这些变化可能导致检测恐惧的敏感性增加和消退过程变慢,从而产生更持久的焦虑反应。我们在关于恐惧和安全学习的现有文献背景下讨论这些结果,并考虑潜在的潜在机制。