Suppr超能文献

当前曼氏血吸虫、日本血吸虫和湄公血吸虫感染状况及感染强度与门周纤维化的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Association of current Schistosoma mansoni, Schistosoma japonicum, and Schistosoma mekongi infection status and intensity with periportal fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ewuzie Adanna, Wilburn Lauren, Thakrar Dixa B, Cheng Huike, Reitzug Fabian, Roberts Nia, Malouf Reem, Chami Goylette F

机构信息

Big Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Health Care Libraries, Bodleian Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Glob Health. 2025 Jan;13(1):e69-e80. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00425-X.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Periportal fibrosis is a severe morbidity caused by both current and past exposure to intestinal schistosomes. We aimed to assess the association between current infection status and intensity of Schistosoma mansoni, Schistosoma japonicum, or Schistosoma mekongi with periportal fibrosis.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Global Health, Global Index Medicus, and MEDLINE from database inception to June 18, 2024. We applied methodological filters to limit our search to randomised controlled trials or observational studies, including before-and-after study designs. Animal studies were excluded, and no date or language limits were applied. We excluded reviews, editorials, personal opinions, and case reports. Self-reported infection status was an ineligible exposure. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full-text reports for eligibility. A third reviewer was consulted in cases of disagreement. The outcome of periportal fibrosis was recorded as reported by study authors to investigate variation in liver fibrosis definitions. For the key exposure of current infection, data were extracted for Schistosoma species, diagnostics, and author-provided infection status and intensity definitions. A meta-analysis was conducted for current schistosome infection status and intensity against author-defined current periportal fibrosis. Pooled effect sizes were derived using inverse-variance weighted random effects. Subgroup analyses included study characteristics and quality. The modified National Institute of Health risk of bias tool was used for assessing study quality. The protocol adhered to PRISMA reporting standards and was prospectively registered on PROSPERO, CRD42022333919.

FINDINGS

Our electronic search retrieved 2853 records, of which 1036 were duplicates. Nine records were identified in bibliographies of eligible full-text reports. We screened 1826 titles and abstracts to find 282 articles that met our inclusion criteria for full-text review. 41 studies were eligible for systematic review, 33 studies were eligible for infection status meta-analysis, and seven studies were eligible for infection intensity meta-analysis. Periportal fibrosis was heterogeneously defined with the Niamey ultrasound protocol most used. When findings were pooled, current schistosome infection status was associated with a higher likelihood of periportal fibrosis compared with no current infection (odds ratio [OR] 2·65, 95% CI 1·79-3·92; p<0·0001). Heterogeneity was high (I=95·81%). In sub-Saharan Africa, before the widespread introduction of mass drug administration in 2003 there was a significant association between current infection status and periportal fibrosis (OR 5·38, 95% CI 2·03-14·25) but this association was no longer present after 2003 (1·19, 0·82-1·74). No association of current infection status was observed with periportal fibrosis in studies that used the Niamey protocol (1·57, 95% CI 0·95-2·59). Associations depended on moderate to high risk of bias studies. No significant differences in pooled effect sizes were observed between infection intensity categories and periportal fibrosis.

INTERPRETATION

WHO guidelines use current schistosome infection intensity as a proxy for schistosomiasis-related morbidity. Our findings support that current infection status is only tenuously associated with periportal fibrosis. Guidelines are needed to better monitor schistosomiasis-related morbidities.

FUNDING

Nuffield Department of Population Health Pump Priming Fund, Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund, John Fell Fund, Robertson Foundation, and UK Research and Innovation Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.

摘要

背景

门静脉周围纤维化是由当前和过去暴露于肠道血吸虫所导致的一种严重病症。我们旨在评估曼氏血吸虫、日本血吸虫或湄公血吸虫的当前感染状况及感染强度与门静脉周围纤维化之间的关联。

方法

在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、Embase、全球卫生数据库、全球医学索引以及MEDLINE,检索时间从各数据库建库至2024年6月18日。我们应用方法学筛选标准,将检索范围限制为随机对照试验或观察性研究,包括前后对照研究设计。排除动物研究,且不设日期或语言限制。排除综述、社论、个人观点及病例报告。自我报告的感染状况不符合纳入标准。两名评审员独立筛选摘要和全文报告以确定是否符合纳入标准。如有分歧,则咨询第三位评审员。门静脉周围纤维化的结局按照研究作者报告的情况进行记录,以调查肝纤维化定义的差异。对于当前感染这一关键暴露因素,提取有关血吸虫种类、诊断方法以及作者提供的感染状况和感染强度定义的数据。针对当前血吸虫感染状况及感染强度与作者定义的当前门静脉周围纤维化进行荟萃分析。采用逆方差加权随机效应模型得出合并效应量。亚组分析包括研究特征和质量。使用改良的美国国立卫生研究院偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。本方案遵循PRISMA报告标准,并在PROSPERO(CRD42022333919)上进行前瞻性注册。

结果

我们的电子检索共获取2853条记录,其中1036条为重复记录。在符合纳入标准的全文报告的参考文献中又识别出9条记录。我们筛选了1826篇标题和摘要,找到282篇符合全文审查纳入标准的文章。41项研究符合系统评价的纳入标准,33项研究符合感染状况荟萃分析的纳入标准,7项研究符合感染强度荟萃分析的纳入标准。门静脉周围纤维化的定义存在异质性,最常用的是尼亚美超声方案。汇总结果显示,与当前无感染相比,当前血吸虫感染状况与门静脉周围纤维化的发生可能性更高相关(比值比[OR] 2.65,95%置信区间1.79 - 3.92;p<0.0001)。异质性较高(I = 95.81%)。在撒哈拉以南非洲,2003年大规模药物治疗广泛推行之前,当前感染状况与门静脉周围纤维化之间存在显著关联(OR 5.38,95%置信区间2.03 - 14.25),但2003年之后这种关联不再存在(1.19,0.82 - 1.74)。在使用尼亚美方案的研究中,未观察到当前感染状况与门静脉周围纤维化之间的关联(1.57,95%置信区间0.95 - 2.59)。关联取决于中到高偏倚风险的研究。在感染强度类别与门静脉周围纤维化之间未观察到合并效应量的显著差异。

解读

世界卫生组织指南将当前血吸虫感染强度作为血吸虫病相关发病情况的替代指标。我们的研究结果支持当前感染状况与门静脉周围纤维化仅有微弱关联。需要制定指南以更好地监测血吸虫病相关发病情况。

资金来源

纳菲尔德人口健康系启动资金、惠康信托机构战略支持基金、约翰·费尔基金、罗伯逊基金会以及英国研究与创新工程与物理科学研究委员会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验