Bojrab Alexandra, Akbari Amin, Broyles Dustin, Magura Janine, Lear Megann, Eckert George, Chen Jie, Turkkahraman Hakan, Conley R Scott
Department of Orthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Department of Energy Engineering, Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2025 Apr;28(2):371-378. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12887. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of different attachment shapes and locations on the extrusion of the upper left lateral incisor (UL2) using thermoplastic aligners.
Seven typodonts were digitally printed with hemi-ellipsoid or rectangular attachments in the incisal, middle or cervical third of the UL2. Five clear aligners were fabricated for each typodont; each was tested twice. Forces and moments were measured with an orthodontic force tester during 0.2 mm simulated extrusion of the UL2. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the effects of group, tooth, and the group-by-tooth interaction on the outcomes. A two-sided 5% significance level was used for all tests.
Altering attachment shape and location had a statistically significant effect on the forces and moments generated in each trial (p < 0.01), except for rectangular incisal and hemi-ellipsoid cervical (p > 0.05). The rectangular middle attachment generated the highest extrusive force (Fz = 7.498 N), followed by hemi-ellipsoid cervical (Fz = 6.338 N) and rectangular incisal (Fz = 5.948 N).
Varying direct attachment shape and location on the UL2 during extrusion has a significant effect on the forces and moments generated by thermoplastic aligners. The rectangular attachment located in the middle third generated the most effective extrusive force and least unwanted moment. For anchorage teeth, hemi-ellipsoid attachments located in the cervical third were found to be the most effective in minimising the reciprocal intrusive forces and unwanted moments.
本研究旨在比较不同附着形状和位置对使用热塑性矫治器时左上侧切牙(UL2)牙根外吸收的影响。
对七副牙模型进行数字打印,在UL2的切缘、中部或颈部三分之一处设置半椭圆形或矩形附件。为每个牙模型制作五副透明矫治器;每副矫治器测试两次。在模拟UL2牙根外吸收0.2毫米的过程中,使用正畸力测试仪测量力和力矩。采用方差分析(ANOVA)来确定组、牙齿以及组与牙齿的交互作用对结果的影响。所有测试均采用双侧5%的显著性水平。
除矩形切缘附件和半椭圆形颈部附件外(p>0.05),改变附件形状和位置对每次试验中产生的力和力矩有统计学显著影响(p<0.01)。矩形中部附件产生的牙根外吸收力最高(Fz = 7.498 N),其次是半椭圆形颈部附件(Fz = 6.338 N)和矩形切缘附件(Fz = 5.948 N)。
在牙根外吸收过程中,改变UL2上直接附件的形状和位置对热塑性矫治器产生的力和力矩有显著影响。位于中部三分之一处的矩形附件产生了最有效的牙根外吸收力和最少的不必要力矩。对于支抗牙,发现位于颈部三分之一处的半椭圆形附件在最小化相互作用的内收力和不必要力矩方面最有效。