Suppr超能文献

波兰医生对无效治疗使用情况的看法。

Opinion of Polish doctors on the use of futile therapy.

作者信息

Damps Maria, Gajda Maksymilian, Wiktor Łukasz, Byrska-Maciejasz Elżbieta, Rybojad Beata, Kowalska Małgorzata, Bartkowska-Śniatkowska Alicja, Paprocka-Lipińska Anna, Kucewicz-Czech Ewa

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Upper Silesian Child Health Centre, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2025 Apr 1;35(2):201-208. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae202.

Abstract

The discontinuation of futile therapy is increasingly discussed in Polish clinical practice. Given the need to ensure patient well-being, it is essential to consider whether all clinical options resulting from medical progress should be used for every patient and on what grounds decisions to limit therapy should be based. The aim of our study was to determine the opinions of Polish medical doctors on this topic. We anonymously surveyed physicians across various specialties. An analysis of the collected data was carried out using descriptive and analytical methods. A total of 323 physicians participated in the study; 93% of them were aware of the problem of futile therapy in adults, with intensivists being significantly more aware (P = 0.002). Additionally, 95% of respondents supported the idea of discontinuing futile therapy, and over 68% used the therapy discontinuation protocol. Among the most common reasons for undertaking futile therapy, respondents cited fear of legal liability (93.5%), as well as fear of being accused of unethical behavior (62.2%) and fear before talking to the patient/patient's family and their reactions (57.9%). Respondents also identified factors that would facilitate making decisions about limiting futile therapy, including precise qualification criteria for limiting therapy and education in this area (95.3%), the patient's declaration of will (87.5%), and a clear legal act (81.3%). The majority of study participants supported the idea of limiting futile therapy, and this issue is well known among Polish physicians.

摘要

在波兰的临床实践中,关于停止无效治疗的讨论日益增多。鉴于需要确保患者的福祉,至关重要的是要考虑医学进步带来的所有临床选择是否应适用于每一位患者,以及限制治疗的决定应以何种依据为基础。我们研究的目的是确定波兰医生对这一主题的看法。我们对各个专业的医生进行了匿名调查。使用描述性和分析性方法对收集到的数据进行了分析。共有323名医生参与了这项研究;其中93%的人了解成人无效治疗的问题,重症监护医生的知晓率显著更高(P = 0.002)。此外,95%的受访者支持停止无效治疗的想法,超过68%的人使用了治疗终止方案。在进行无效治疗的最常见原因中,受访者提到了对法律责任的恐惧(93.5%),以及对被指控行为不道德的恐惧(62.2%)和在与患者/患者家属交谈前的恐惧及其反应(57.9%)。受访者还确定了有助于做出限制无效治疗决定的因素,包括限制治疗的精确资格标准和该领域的教育(95.3%)、患者的意愿声明(87.5%)以及明确的法律行为(81.3%)。大多数研究参与者支持限制无效治疗的想法,并且这个问题在波兰医生中广为人知。

相似文献

1
Opinion of Polish doctors on the use of futile therapy.波兰医生对无效治疗使用情况的看法。
Eur J Public Health. 2025 Apr 1;35(2):201-208. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae202.
4
Futile therapy: a survey of Polish anaesthesiologists.无效治疗:波兰麻醉医师的一项调查。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2025 Apr 15;57(1):50-58. doi: 10.5114/ait/200232.

本文引用的文献

2
Reconsidering Capacity to Appoint a Healthcare Proxy.重新思考指定医疗代理人的能力。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2023 Jan;32(1):69-75. doi: 10.1017/S0963180122000512. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
6
What's Wrong With Advance Care Planning?预先护理规划存在什么问题?
JAMA. 2021 Oct 26;326(16):1575-1576. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.16430.
7
Triage during the COVID-19 pandemic.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的分诊
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2020;52(4):312-315. doi: 10.5114/ait.2020.100564.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验