Mac Olivia, Ayre Julie, McCaffery Kirsten, Boroumand Farzaneh, Bell Katy, Muscat Danielle M
Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jun;40(8):1820-1828. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09200-z. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
Despite increasing attention on health literacy and the inclusion of grade reading level recommendations in guidelines, it remains unclear if lowering the grade reading level of written health information to specific target grades improves patient-related outcomes.
To assess whether grade reading level of written information affects knowledge, perceived reading ease, acceptability and trustworthiness of information and, to explore whether information written at a lower grade reading level reduces disparities in outcomes across health literacy levels.
We conducted a 4-arm online randomized trial with a community sample of adults living in Australia from 31 July to 20 September 2023.
Participants were randomised to one of four arms: Information about sciatica and knee osteoarthritis written at a grade 8, 10, 12 or 14 reading level. Readability was assessed using the SMOG Index and iteratively revised to each lower grade.
Primary outcome was knowledge of health conditions. Secondary outcomes were brief knowledge, perceived reading ease, acceptability (i.e., perceived usefulness and likelihood to recommend) and trustworthiness of information.
2235 participants were randomised and included in the analysis. Mean age was 41 years and 54.5% identified as female. Low health literacy was identified in 28.2% of participants. We found no evidence of a main effect of grade reading level on knowledge (grade 8: 9.0 (SD = 2.7), grade 10: 9.1 (SD = 2.6), grade 12: 8.9, grade 14: 9.1 (SD = 2.7). Participants with high health literacy had higher knowledge scores overall, however, there was no evidence that health literacy modified the effect of grade reading level. There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes.
Our study showed no difference in knowledge when grade reading level was manipulated alone. Our findings indicate there is limited value in reducing grade reading level without attention to other health literacy principles.
ACTRN12623000224628p.
尽管对健康素养的关注度不断提高,且指南中纳入了年级阅读水平建议,但降低书面健康信息的年级阅读水平至特定目标年级是否能改善与患者相关的结局仍不明确。
评估书面信息的年级阅读水平是否会影响信息的知识掌握程度、感知阅读难易度、可接受性和可信度,并探讨以较低年级阅读水平编写的信息是否能减少不同健康素养水平人群在结局方面的差异。
我们于2023年7月31日至9月20日对居住在澳大利亚的成年人社区样本进行了一项四臂在线随机试验。
参与者被随机分为四组之一:分别以8年级、10年级、12年级或14年级阅读水平编写的关于坐骨神经痛和膝骨关节炎的信息。使用雾度指数(SMOG Index)评估可读性,并反复修订至每个较低年级水平。
主要结局是对健康状况的了解。次要结局包括简要知识、感知阅读难易度、可接受性(即感知有用性和推荐可能性)以及信息的可信度。
2235名参与者被随机分组并纳入分析。平均年龄为41岁,54.5%的参与者为女性。28.2%的参与者健康素养较低。我们没有发现年级阅读水平对知识掌握程度有主要影响的证据(8年级:9.0(标准差=2.7),10年级:9.1(标准差=2.6),12年级:8.9,14年级:9.1(标准差=2.7))。总体而言,健康素养高的参与者知识得分更高,然而,没有证据表明健康素养会改变年级阅读水平的影响。在任何次要结局方面均无显著差异。
我们的研究表明,单独改变年级阅读水平时,知识掌握程度没有差异。我们的研究结果表明,在不关注其他健康素养原则的情况下降低年级阅读水平的价值有限。
ACTRN12623000224628p。