Leveraro E, Cellerino M, Lapucci C, Dighero M, Nasone L, Sirito T, Boccia D, Cavalli N, Bavestrello G, Uccelli A, Boffa G, Inglese M
Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, and Mother-Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Jan;32(1):e70007. doi: 10.1111/ene.70007.
The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) has been validated in many cross-sectional studies. However, longitudinal data on BICAMS subset trajectories and their correlation with disease activity during follow-up are scarce.
We aimed to (i) assess BICAMS changes in MS patients initiating high-efficacy disease-modifying-treatments (DMTs), (ii) compare these changes based on maintenance of "no-evidence-of-disease-activity" (NEDA-3) status over 24 months, and (iii) determine baseline clinical parameters predictive of cognitive changes.
We enrolled 101 MS patients (mean age:40,45 ± 11; Relapsing-Remitting-MS:81%) initiating highly-effective-DMTs. Patients underwent Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), BICAMS, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), at baseline and after 24 months. Regression-based change index (RB-CI) had been used for cognitive change evaluation over follow-up.
During follow-up, 78 (77.3%) patients maintained NEDA-3 status. Considering a 90% of confidence levels for RB-CI, 12 (11.9%) improved at SDMT, 13 (12.9%) at CVLT-II and 13 (12.9%) at BVMT-R; while 7 (6.9%) were classified as worsened at SDMT, 11 (10.9%) at CVLT-II and 8 (7.9%) at BVMT-R. SDMT scores significantly improved at follow-up for the entire group (p = 0.003) and in patients maintaining NEDA-3 (p < 0.001). The multivariable regression model assessing the SDMT improvement (n = 12; z = 1.65), was significant and explained 21% of the variance (p = 0.038; Nagelkerke R = 0.212). Lower EDSS proved to be an independent predictor of SDMT reliable improvement (p = 0.027) in our sample.
Our findings showed that early disease activity control-especially in patients with low baseline disability-may yield significant benefits even in terms of cognitive performance.
简短国际多发性硬化症认知评估量表(BICAMS)已在许多横断面研究中得到验证。然而,关于BICAMS子量表轨迹及其与随访期间疾病活动相关性的纵向数据却很少。
我们旨在(i)评估开始高效疾病修饰治疗(DMT)的多发性硬化症患者的BICAMS变化,(ii)根据24个月内“无疾病活动证据”(NEDA-3)状态的维持情况比较这些变化,以及(iii)确定预测认知变化的基线临床参数。
我们纳入了101例开始使用高效DMT的多发性硬化症患者(平均年龄:40.45±11岁;复发缓解型多发性硬化症:81%)。患者在基线和24个月后接受了扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)、BICAMS和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)评估。基于回归的变化指数(RB-CI)用于随访期间的认知变化评估。
随访期间,78例(77.3%)患者维持NEDA-3状态。考虑到RB-CI的90%置信水平,符号数字模式测验(SDMT)中有12例(11.9%)改善,加利福尼亚语言学习测验第二版(CVLT-II)中有13例(12.9%)改善,Rey听觉词语学习测验修订版(BVMT-R)中有13例(12.9%)改善;而SDMT中有7例(6.9%)被归类为恶化,CVLT-II中有11例(10.9%)恶化,BVMT-R中有8例(7.9%)恶化。整个组在随访时SDMT评分显著改善(p = 其与随访期间疾病活动相关性的纵向数据却很少。
我们旨在(i)评估开始高效疾病修饰治疗(DMT)的多发性硬化症患者的BICAMS变化,(ii)根据24个月内“无疾病活动证据”(NEDA-3)状态的维持情况比较这些变化,以及(iii)确定预测认知变化的基线临床参数。
我们纳入了101例开始使用高效DMT的多发性硬化症患者(平均年龄:40.45±11岁;复发缓解型多发性硬化症:81%)。患者在基线和24个月后接受了扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)、BICAMS和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)评估。基于回归的变化指数(RB-CI)用于随访期间的认知变化评估。
随访期间,78例(77.3%)患者维持NEDA-3状态。考虑到RB-CI的90%置信水平,符号数字模式测验(SDMT)中有12例(11.9%)改善,加利福尼亚语言学习测验第二版(CVLT-II)中有13例(12.9%)改善,Rey听觉词语学习测验修订版(BVMT-R)中有13例(12.9%)改善;而SDMT中有7例(6.9%)被归类为恶化,CVLT-II中有11例(10.9%)恶化,BVMT-R中有8例(7.9%)恶化。整个组在随访时SDMT评分显著改善(p = 0.003),维持NEDA-3状态患者的SDMT评分也显著改善(p < 0.001)。评估SDMT改善情况(n = 12;z = 1.65)的多变量回归模型具有显著性,解释了21%的方差(p = 0.038;Nagelkerke R = 0.212)。在我们的样本中,较低的EDSS被证明是SDMT可靠改善的独立预测因素(p = 0.027)。
我们的研究结果表明,早期疾病活动控制——尤其是基线残疾程度较低的患者——即使在认知表现方面也可能产生显著益处。 0.003),维持NEDA-3状态患者的SDMT评分也显著改善(p < 0.001)。评估SDMT改善情况(n = 12;z = 1.65)的多变量回归模型具有显著性,解释了21%的方差(p = 0.038;Nagelkerke R = 0.212)。在我们的样本中,较低的EDSS被证明是SDMT可靠改善的独立预测因素(p = 0.027)。
我们的研究结果表明,早期疾病活动控制——尤其是基线残疾程度较低的患者——即使在认知表现方面也可能产生显著益处。