The pervasive impact of frailty on ovarian cancer care and the role of prehabilitation: Qualitative perspectives of key stakeholders.

INTRODUCTION

We performed a qualitative study to explore key stakeholders' perspectives about the impact of frailty on ovarian cancer care and evaluate a candidate prehabilitation intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with patient-caregiver dyads and multi-disciplinary clinicians. Patients were ≥ 50 years of age with a new diagnosis of advanced stage (III/IV) ovarian cancer who received cancer-directed treatment (chemotherapy and/or surgery) during the past year and met criteria as pre-frail or frail using the FRAIL scale. We used a semi-structured interview guide to elicit participants' views on frailty, nutrition, physical therapy, and a candidate prehabilitation intervention. We used inductive and deductive approaches to code and analyze interviews and identify emergent themes and patterns.

RESULTS

Ten patients and caregivers (five dyads) and 10 providers were interviewed. We identified four themes: (1) frailty screening is essential to prevent over- and under-treatment, but underused; (2) stakeholders preferred a multidisciplinary approach to providing tailored care for frail patients over a candidate prehabilitation intervention; (3) patient, family caregiver, and clinician stakeholders reported multiple barriers to prehabilitation programs, including concerns about selection bias, and (4) frail patients and family members are vulnerable and require more psychosocial support.

DISCUSSION

We identified significant barriers to prehabilitation interventions for frail patients with ovarian cancer; initiatives to increase frailty screening and provide tailored multi-disciplinary approaches may have a greater impact.