Amiri Sahar Vanessa, Laustsen-Kiel Cecilie Mullerup, Carlsen Berit, Taudorf Elisabeth, Hesselfeldt Jørgen, Jemec Gregor Borut, Kaae Jeanette
Department of Plastic and Breast Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark; Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Plastic and Breast Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark; Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2025 Feb;101:90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.053. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
Experts have widely discussed rhinophyma treatment, proposing and testing various therapies over the years. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the aesthetic outcomes of patients undergoing the cold blade technique at the Department of Plastic Surgery and ablative fractional carbon dioxide (CO) laser treatment at the Department of Dermatology at Zealand University Hospital. We assessed rhinophyma severity using the RHISI scale with pre-and post-operative photographs evaluated by senior consultants from each department, who were blinded to the treatment method. Additionally, the patients completed a questionnaire to gauge their satisfaction and willingness to recommend the procedure. Cosmetic outcomes were deemed excellent or good (75% for surgery and 71% for CO-laser) in both treatment methods. Only one patient answered with moderate satisfaction. Therefore, we recommend both methods as possible treatment options.
专家们对鼻赘治疗进行了广泛讨论，多年来提出并测试了各种疗法。这项回顾性研究的目的是比较在西兰大学医院整形外科接受冷刀技术治疗的患者与皮肤科接受剥脱性分次二氧化碳（CO）激光治疗的患者的美学效果。我们使用RHISI量表评估鼻赘严重程度，术前和术后照片由各科室的高级顾问评估，他们对治疗方法不知情。此外，患者完成了一份问卷，以衡量他们的满意度和推荐该手术的意愿。两种治疗方法的美容效果均被评为优秀或良好（手术为75%，CO激光为71%）。只有一名患者回答满意度一般。因此，我们推荐这两种方法作为可能的治疗选择。
