Halladay J, Sunderland M, Newton N C, Lynch S J, Chapman C, Stapinski L, Andrews J L, Birrell L, Teesson M, Slade T
School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Psychol Med. 2024 Dec 23;54(16):1-11. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724002897.
Adolescence is a critical period for preventing substance use and mental health concerns, often targeted through separate school-based programs. However, co-occurrence is common and is related to worse outcomes. This study explores prevention effects of leading school-based prevention programs on co-occurring alcohol use and psychological distress.
Data from two Australian cluster randomized trials involving 8576 students in 97 schools were harmonized for analysis. Students received either health education (control) or one of five prevention programs (e.g. Climate Schools, PreVenture) with assessments at baseline and 6, 12, 24, and 30 or 36 months (from ages ~13-16). Multilevel multinomial regressions were used to predict the relative risk ratios (RRs) of students reporting co-occurring early alcohol use and psychological distress, alcohol use only, distress only, or neither (reference) across programs.
The combined Climate Schools: Alcohol and Cannabis and Climate Schools: Mental Health courses (CSC) as well as the PreVenture program reduced the risk of adolescents reporting co-occurring alcohol use and psychological distress (36 months RR = 0.37; RR = 0.22). Other evaluated programs (excluding Climate Schools: Mental Health) only appeared effective for reducing the risk of alcohol use that occurred without distress.
Evidence-based programs exist that reduce the risk of early alcohol use with and without co-occurring psychological distress, though preventing psychological distress alone requires further exploration. Prevention programs appear to have different effects depending on whether alcohol use and distress present on their own or together, thus suggesting the need for tailored prevention strategies.
青春期是预防物质使用和心理健康问题的关键时期,通常通过单独的校内项目来解决。然而,物质使用和心理健康问题同时出现的情况很常见,且与更糟糕的结果相关。本研究探讨了主要的校内预防项目对酒精使用与心理困扰同时出现的预防效果。
对来自澳大利亚两项整群随机试验的数据进行整合分析,这两项试验涉及97所学校的8576名学生。学生们接受了健康教育(对照组)或五个预防项目之一(如气候学校项目、预防项目),并在基线以及6个月、12个月、24个月和30或36个月(年龄约13 - 16岁)时进行评估。使用多水平多项回归来预测各项目中报告同时出现早期酒精使用和心理困扰、仅酒精使用、仅心理困扰或两者都未出现(参照组)的学生的相对风险比(RRs)。
综合的气候学校:酒精与大麻及气候学校:心理健康课程(CSC)以及预防项目降低了青少年报告同时出现酒精使用和心理困扰的风险(36个月时RR = 0.37;RR = 0.22)。其他评估项目(不包括气候学校:心理健康)似乎仅对降低无心理困扰情况下酒精使用的风险有效。
存在基于证据的项目可降低早期酒精使用的风险,无论是否伴有心理困扰,不过单独预防心理困扰还需要进一步探索。预防项目似乎根据酒精使用和心理困扰是单独出现还是同时出现而产生不同效果,因此表明需要量身定制的预防策略。