Byrnes Jeffrey, Robinson Michael
Grand Valley State University.
Chapman University.
Nurs Ethics. 2025 Sep;32(6):1749-1760. doi: 10.1177/09697330241307317. Epub 2024 Dec 22.
In response to recent proposals to utilize artificial intelligence (AI) to automate ethics consultations in healthcare, we raise two main problems for the prospect of having healthcare professionals rely on AI-driven programs to provide ethical guidance in clinical matters. The first cause for concern is that, because these programs would effectively function like black boxes, this approach seems to preclude the kind of transparency that would allow clinical staff to explain and justify treatment decisions to patients, fellow caregivers, and those tasked with providing oversight. The other main problem is that the kind of authority that would need to be given to the guidance issuing from these programs in order to do the work set out for them would mean that clinical staff would not be empowered to provide meaningful safeguards against it in those cases when its recommendations are morally problematic.
针对最近利用人工智能(AI)实现医疗保健伦理咨询自动化的提议,我们提出了两个主要问题,涉及医疗保健专业人员依靠人工智能驱动的程序在临床事务中提供伦理指导的前景。第一个令人担忧的原因是,由于这些程序实际上就像黑匣子一样运作,这种方法似乎排除了那种能让临床工作人员向患者、同事以及负责监督的人员解释和证明治疗决策合理性的透明度。另一个主要问题是,为了让这些程序完成既定工作,需要赋予其指导意见的那种权威性意味着,在其建议存在道德问题的情况下,临床工作人员将无权提供有效的防范措施。