• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们如何在献血和研究中与女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别群体建立联系?来自“评估献血者变异性及献血资格新概念”研究的思考。

How do we engage with the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community in blood donation and research? Reflections from the Assessing Donor Variability and New Concepts in Eligibility study.

作者信息

Crowder Lauren A, Reik Rita, Stramer Susan L, Whitaker Barbee I, Buccheri Renata, Zurita Karla G, Gehrig Nick, Forbes Susan, Wilson Rodney, Pandey Suchitra, Custer Brian

机构信息

Independent Consultant, Hanover, Maryland, USA.

OneBlood, Orlando, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2025 Mar;65(3):435-445. doi: 10.1111/trf.18098. Epub 2024 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1111/trf.18098
PMID:39710622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11925135/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Assessing Donor Variability and New Concepts in Eligibility (ADVANCE) study was a multicenter cross-organizational collaboration to collect data to inform possible changes in blood donor selection criteria for men who have sex with men. Multiple recruitment approaches were used, and these may be applicable to current efforts in LGBTQ+ community engagement to recruit new blood donors.

METHODS

Fieldwork for ADVANCE was a partnership between blood collection organizations (BCOs) and LGBTQ+ community organizations. First, we had to establish relationships with these organizations based on trust and commitment to common objectives. We developed recruitment materials for online and printed distribution. We worked directly with organizations in each community to tailor outreach. Approaches changed over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

The study website was a portal for general information about donation policy, the study itself, scheduling study visits, and news stories. It was important to evolve outreach messages and approaches over time. Study team members created changing content and posting schedules on the website and social media platforms. We also worked with community and social media influencers to raise community awareness about the study. Later in the pandemic, we were able to recruit at in-person community events. These in-person events were our most successful outreach.

DISCUSSION

The partnerships with LGBTQ+ community organizations, diversity promotion groups, and other members of the community were instrumental in making ADVANCE a success. The approaches we used for the study may be valuable for BCO outreach to attract new blood donors.

摘要

背景

评估捐赠者变异性与资格认定新概念(ADVANCE)研究是一项多中心跨组织合作项目,旨在收集数据,为男男性行为者献血者选择标准的可能变化提供参考依据。该研究采用了多种招募方法,这些方法可能适用于当前LGBTQ+社区为招募新献血者所做的努力。

方法

ADVANCE的实地工作是采血组织(BCO)与LGBTQ+社区组织之间的合作。首先,我们必须基于对共同目标的信任和承诺与这些组织建立关系。我们制作了用于在线和印刷分发的招募材料。我们直接与每个社区的组织合作,以量身定制外展活动。在新冠疫情期间,这些方法有所变化。

结果

研究网站是一个提供捐赠政策、研究本身、安排研究访问以及新闻报道等一般信息的门户网站。随着时间的推移不断改进外展信息和方法很重要。研究团队成员在网站和社交媒体平台上创建不断变化的内容和发布时间表。我们还与社区和社交媒体有影响力的人合作,提高社区对该研究的认识。在疫情后期,我们能够在面对面的社区活动中进行招募。这些面对面活动是我们最成功的外展活动。

讨论

与LGBTQ+社区组织、促进多元化团体以及社区其他成员的合作对ADVANCE的成功起到了关键作用。我们在研究中使用的方法可能对采血组织吸引新献血者的外展工作很有价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/11925135/d9749bf119c1/TRF-65-435-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/11925135/18758578405a/TRF-65-435-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/11925135/d3ba9ba4d39c/TRF-65-435-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/11925135/697cc6519821/TRF-65-435-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/11925135/7162b942e70f/TRF-65-435-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/11925135/a572c5caba47/TRF-65-435-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/11925135/b408e6971b87/TRF-65-435-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/11925135/d9749bf119c1/TRF-65-435-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/11925135/18758578405a/TRF-65-435-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/11925135/d3ba9ba4d39c/TRF-65-435-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/11925135/697cc6519821/TRF-65-435-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/11925135/7162b942e70f/TRF-65-435-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/11925135/a572c5caba47/TRF-65-435-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/11925135/b408e6971b87/TRF-65-435-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/11925135/d9749bf119c1/TRF-65-435-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
How do we engage with the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community in blood donation and research? Reflections from the Assessing Donor Variability and New Concepts in Eligibility study.我们如何在献血和研究中与女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别群体建立联系?来自“评估献血者变异性及献血资格新概念”研究的思考。
Transfusion. 2025 Mar;65(3):435-445. doi: 10.1111/trf.18098. Epub 2024 Dec 22.
2
Improving gay, bisexual and transgender inclusion in blood and plasma donation policies and programmes in Canada: A qualitative study.提高加拿大血液和血浆捐赠政策和项目中对男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者的包容性:一项定性研究。
Vox Sang. 2024 Jul;119(7):656-663. doi: 10.1111/vox.13636. Epub 2024 Apr 14.
3
Recruiting Sexual and Gender Minority Veterans for Health Disparities Research: Recruitment Protocol of a Web-Based Prospective Cohort Study.招募性取向和性别少数群体退伍军人参与健康差异研究:一项基于网络的前瞻性队列研究的招募方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Oct 2;12:e43824. doi: 10.2196/43824.
4
Blood Donation and COVID-19: Reconsidering the 3-Month Deferral Policy for Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men.献血与 COVID-19:重新考虑男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者和其他与男性发生性行为的男性的 3 个月献血延期政策。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Feb;111(2):247-252. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305974. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
5
Recruitment of Young Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men for a Web-Based Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Intervention: Differences in Participant Characteristics and Study Engagement by Recruitment Source in a Randomized Controlled Trial.招募年轻男同性恋者、双性恋者及其他与男性发生性行为的男性参与基于网络的人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种干预研究:随机对照试验中按招募来源划分的参与者特征及研究参与度差异
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 3;27:e64668. doi: 10.2196/64668.
6
The Impact of Generative Conversational Artificial Intelligence on the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Community: Scoping Review.生成式对话人工智能对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿群体的影响:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 6;25:e52091. doi: 10.2196/52091.
7
Barriers and enablers to source plasma donation by gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men under revised eligibility criteria: protocol for a multiple stakeholder feasibility study.根据修订后的资格标准,男同性恋者、双性恋者及其他与男性发生性行为的男性进行血浆捐献的障碍与促进因素:多利益相关方可行性研究方案
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Nov 2;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00643-4.
8
Stepping Stones or Second Class Donors?: a qualitative analysis of gay, bisexual, and queer men's perspectives on plasma donation policy in Canada.踏脚石还是二等捐献者?:对加拿大男同性恋、双性恋和酷儿群体对血浆捐献政策看法的定性分析。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 5;21(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10480-x.
9
A mixed methods investigation of the relationship between blood donor policy, interest in donation, and willingness to donate among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in Ontario, Canada.一项混合方法研究,旨在调查加拿大安大略省男同性恋、双性恋和其他与男性发生性关系的男性(MSM)中,献血政策、献血兴趣和献血意愿之间的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 28;22(1):849. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13229-2.
10
Sex in the Time of COVID-19: Patterns of Sexual Behavior Among LGBTQ+ Individuals in the U.S.新冠疫情时期的性:美国 LGBTQ+人群性行为模式
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Jan;51(1):287-301. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02298-4. Epub 2022 Feb 9.

本文引用的文献

1
HIV risk behavior profiles among men who have sex with men interested in donating blood: Findings from the Assessing Donor Variability and New Concepts in Eligibility study.男男性行为者的 HIV 风险行为特征研究:来自“评估供者多样性和资格认定新概念”研究的发现。
Transfusion. 2023 Oct;63(10):1872-1884. doi: 10.1111/trf.17515. Epub 2023 Aug 29.