Han Dong, Moon Jihye, Díaz Luís Roberto Mercado, Chen Darren, Williams Devan, Mohagheghian Fahimeh, Ghetia Om, Peitzsch Andrew G, Kong Youngsun, Nishita Nishat, Ghutadaria Ohm, Orwig Taylor A, Otabil Edith Mensah, Noorishirazi Kamran, Hamel Alexander, Dickson Emily L, DiMezza Danielle, Lessard Darleen, Wang Ziyue, Mehawej Jordy, Filippaios Andreas, Naeem Syed, Gottbrecht Matthew F, Fitzgibbons Timothy P, Saczynski Jane S, Barton Bruce, Ding Eric Y, Tran Khanh-Van, McManus David D, Chon Ki H
University of Connecticut.
Morehouse School of Medicine.
Res Sq. 2024 Dec 13:rs.3.rs-5463126. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5463126/v1.
In the early stages of atrial fibrillation (AF), most cases are paroxysmal (pAF), making identification only possible with continuous and prolonged monitoring. With the advent of wearables, smartwatches equipped with photoplethysmographic (PPG) sensors are an ideal approach for continuous monitoring of pAF. There have been numerous studies demonstrating successful capture of pAF events, especially using deep learning. However, deep learning requires a large amount of data and independent testing on diverse datasets, to ensure the generalizability of the model, and most prior studies did not meet these requirements. Moreover, most prior studies using wearable-based PPG sensor data collection were limited either to controlled environments, to minimize motion artifacts, or to short duration data collection. Most importantly, frequent premature atrial and ventricular contractions (PAC/PVC) can confound most AF detection algorithms. This has not been well studied, largely due to limited datasets containing these rhythms. Note that the recent deep learning models show 97% AF detection accuracy, and the sensitivity of the current state-of-the-art technique for PAC/PVC detection is only 75% on minimally motion artifact corrupted PPG data. Our study aims to address the above limitations using a recently completed NIH-funded Pulsewatch clinical trial which collected smartwatch PPG data over two weeks from 106 subjects. For our approach, we used multi-modal data which included 1D PPG, accelerometer, and heart rate data. We used a computationally efficient 1D bi-directional Gated Recurrent Unit (1D-Bi-GRU) deep learning model to detect three classes: normal sinus rhythm, AF, and PAC/PVC. Our proposed 1D-Bi-GRU model's performance was compared with two other deep learning models that have reported some of the highest performance metrics, in prior work. For three-arrhythmia-classification, testing data for all deep learning models consisted of using independent data and subjects from the training data, and further evaluations were performed using two independent datasets that were not part of the training dataset. Our multimodal model achieved an unprecedented 83% sensitivity for PAC/PVC detection while maintaining a high accuracy of 97.31% for AF detection. Our model was computationally more efficient (14 times more efficient and 2.7 times faster) and outperformed the best state-of-the-art model by 20.81% for PAC/PVC sensitivity and 2.55% for AF accuracy. We also tested our models on two independent PPG datasets collected with a different smartwatch and a fingertip PPG sensor. Our three-arrhythmia-classification results show high macro-averaged area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 96.22%, and 94.17% for two independent datasets, demonstrating better generalizability of the proposed model.
在心房颤动(AF)的早期阶段,大多数病例为阵发性(pAF),只有通过持续和长时间监测才能识别。随着可穿戴设备的出现,配备光电容积脉搏波描记(PPG)传感器的智能手表是连续监测pAF的理想方法。已有大量研究证明成功捕获了pAF事件,尤其是使用深度学习。然而,深度学习需要大量数据并在不同数据集上进行独立测试,以确保模型的通用性,而大多数先前的研究并未满足这些要求。此外,大多数先前使用基于可穿戴设备的PPG传感器数据收集的研究要么局限于受控环境以最小化运动伪影,要么局限于短时间数据收集。最重要的是,频繁的房性和室性早搏(PAC/PVC)会混淆大多数AF检测算法。这方面尚未得到充分研究,主要是因为包含这些心律的数据集有限。请注意,最近的深度学习模型显示AF检测准确率为97%,而当前最先进的PAC/PVC检测技术在最小运动伪影损坏的PPG数据上的灵敏度仅为75%。我们的研究旨在利用最近完成的由美国国立卫生研究院资助的Pulsewatch临床试验来解决上述局限性,该试验从106名受试者那里收集了两周的智能手表PPG数据。对于我们的方法,我们使用了多模态数据,包括一维PPG、加速度计和心率数据。我们使用了一种计算效率高的一维双向门控循环单元(1D-Bi-GRU)深度学习模型来检测三类:正常窦性心律、AF和PAC/PVC。我们提出的1D-Bi-GRU模型的性能与先前工作中报告了一些最高性能指标的另外两个深度学习模型进行了比较。对于三类心律失常分类,所有深度学习模型的测试数据包括使用来自训练数据的独立数据和受试者,并使用不属于训练数据集的两个独立数据集进行进一步评估。我们的多模态模型在PAC/PVC检测方面实现了前所未有的83%的灵敏度,同时在AF检测方面保持了97.31%的高精度。我们的模型在计算上更高效(效率高14倍,速度快2.7倍),在PAC/PVC灵敏度方面比最佳的最先进模型高出20.81%,在AF准确率方面高出2.55%。我们还在使用不同智能手表和指尖PPG传感器收集的两个独立PPG数据集上测试了我们的模型。我们的三类心律失常分类结果显示,在两个独立数据集上,接收器操作特征曲线下的宏平均面积值分别高达96.22%和94.17%,表明所提出模型具有更好的通用性。