• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善医疗保健中的生存模型:一种新颖的匹配方法。

Improving survival models in healthcare: a novel matching approach.

作者信息

Bertsimas Dimitris, Ning Catherine, Lønning Per Eystein, Baba Hideo, Endo Itaru, Burkhart Richard, Aucejo Federico N, Balzer Felix, Kreis Martin E, Margonis Georgios Antonios

机构信息

Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Res Sq. 2024 Dec 12:rs.3.rs-5467577. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5467577/v1.

DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-5467577/v1
PMID:39711552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11661418/
Abstract

We present, to our knowledge, the first methodological study aimed at enhancing the prognostic power of Cox regression models, widely used in survival analysis, through optimized data selection. Our approach employs a novel two-stage mechanism: by framing the prognostic stratum matching problem intuitively, we select prognostically representative patient observations to create a more balanced training set. This enables the model to assign equal attention to distinct prognostic subgroups. We demonstrate the methodology using an observational dataset of 1,799 patients with resected colorectal cancer liver metastases, 1,197 of whom received adjuvant chemotherapy and 602 who did not. In our study, as is current standard practice, the comparator was training prognostic models on the entire cohort (referred to as "model 1"). Models trained on the untreated and treated subgroups, matched through our approach (referred to as "model 3"), showed an improvement of up to 20% in bootstrapped C-indices compared to model 1. Notably, model 3 exhibited superior calibration, with a 6- to 10-fold improvement over model 1. Additional performance metrics aligned with these findings, and robustness was confirmed through bias-corrected bootstrapping. Given the ongoing development of numerous linear prognostic models and the general applicability of our approach to any observational data, this method holds significant potential to impact biomedical research and clinical practice where prognostic models are utilized.

摘要

据我们所知,我们开展了第一项旨在通过优化数据选择来增强Cox回归模型(在生存分析中广泛使用)预后能力的方法学研究。我们的方法采用了一种新颖的两阶段机制:通过直观地构建预后分层匹配问题,我们选择具有预后代表性的患者观察数据,以创建一个更加平衡的训练集。这使得模型能够对不同的预后亚组给予同等关注。我们使用一个包含1799例接受过结直肠癌肝转移切除术患者的观察数据集来演示该方法,其中1197例接受了辅助化疗,602例未接受辅助化疗。在我们的研究中,按照当前的标准做法,对照是在整个队列上训练预后模型(称为“模型1”)。通过我们的方法进行匹配后,在未治疗和已治疗亚组上训练的模型(称为“模型3”),与模型1相比,自展C指数提高了20%。值得注意的是,模型3表现出更好的校准,比模型1提高了6至10倍。其他性能指标也与这些发现一致,并且通过偏差校正自展法证实了其稳健性。鉴于众多线性预后模型仍在不断发展,且我们的方法对任何观察数据都具有普遍适用性,该方法在利用预后模型的生物医学研究和临床实践中具有显著的潜在影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b9/11661418/a52d2f3f0ffa/nihpp-rs5467577v1-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b9/11661418/b6e4c46f2f2e/nihpp-rs5467577v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b9/11661418/d8ef3fa503bf/nihpp-rs5467577v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b9/11661418/a2e0e772e605/nihpp-rs5467577v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b9/11661418/a52d2f3f0ffa/nihpp-rs5467577v1-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b9/11661418/b6e4c46f2f2e/nihpp-rs5467577v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b9/11661418/d8ef3fa503bf/nihpp-rs5467577v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b9/11661418/a2e0e772e605/nihpp-rs5467577v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b9/11661418/a52d2f3f0ffa/nihpp-rs5467577v1-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving survival models in healthcare: a novel matching approach.改善医疗保健中的生存模型:一种新颖的匹配方法。
Res Sq. 2024 Dec 12:rs.3.rs-5467577. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5467577/v1.
2
Constructing a prognostic model for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases after preoperative chemotherapy: a study based on SEER and an external validation cohort.基于 SEER 和外部验证队列构建术前化疗后结直肠癌伴肝转移的预后模型: 一项研究。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Dec;26(12):3169-3190. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03513-5. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
3
Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.成人新诊断慢性淋巴细胞白血病的预后模型:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 31;7(7):CD012022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012022.pub2.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Improving Clinical Risk Stratification at Diagnosis in Primary Prostate Cancer: A Prognostic Modelling Study.改善原发性前列腺癌诊断时的临床风险分层:一项预后建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2016 Aug 2;13(8):e1002063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002063. eCollection 2016 Aug.
7
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
8
Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is important for improving long-term survival in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases undergoing simultaneous resection.术后辅助化疗对于改善同时性切除的结直肠癌肝转移患者的长期生存率至关重要。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 May;39(5):908-919. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16504. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Simultaneous curative resection may improve the long-term survival of patients diagnosed with colorectal liver metastases: A propensity score-matching study.同步根治性切除可能改善结直肠癌肝转移患者的长期生存:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Surgery. 2025 May;181:109144. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.109144. Epub 2025 Jan 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Prediction Models for Prognosis of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Comprehensive Review of Regression-Based and Machine Learning Models.结直肠癌肝转移预后的临床预测模型:基于回归和机器学习模型的综合综述
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 25;16(9):1645. doi: 10.3390/cancers16091645.
2
Explainable interpretable artificial intelligence frameworks in oncology.肿瘤学中可解释的人工智能框架。
Transl Cancer Res. 2023 Feb 28;12(2):217-220. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-2427. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
3
Performance of two prognostic scores that incorporate genetic information to predict long-term outcomes following resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases: An external validation of the MD Anderson and JHH-MSK scores.
两种纳入遗传信息的预后评分系统对结直肠癌肝转移切除术后远期预后的预测效能:MD 安德森和 JHH-MSK 评分的外部验证。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021 Jul;28(7):581-592. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.963. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
4
Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics.校准:预测分析的阿喀琉斯之踵。
BMC Med. 2019 Dec 16;17(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1466-7.
5
Prognostic models will be victims of their own success, unless….预后模型将成为自身成功的受害者,除非……
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Dec 1;26(12):1645-1650. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz145.
6
The Integrated Calibration Index (ICI) and related metrics for quantifying the calibration of logistic regression models.综合校准指数(ICI)及其相关指标,用于量化逻辑回归模型的校准。
Stat Med. 2019 Sep 20;38(21):4051-4065. doi: 10.1002/sim.8281. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
7
Genetic And Morphological Evaluation (GAME) score for patients with colorectal liver metastases.结直肠癌肝转移患者的遗传和形态学评估(GAME)评分。
Br J Surg. 2018 Aug;105(9):1210-1220. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10838. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
8
Discrimination and Calibration of Clinical Prediction Models: Users' Guides to the Medical Literature.临床预测模型的判别与校准:医学文献的使用者指南。
JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1377-1384. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12126.
9
A calibration hierarchy for risk models was defined: from utopia to empirical data.定义了风险模型的校准层次结构:从理想状态到经验数据。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;74:167-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.005. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
10
Prognostic factors after R0 resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases: A systematic review and pooled-analysis.结直肠癌肝转移R0切除术后的预后因素:一项系统评价与汇总分析。
Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2016;11(1):56-62. doi: 10.2174/1574887110666151006093403.