• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下肢足部活动范围评估:哪种测量方法最可靠?

Evaluation of Leg-foot Range of Motion: Which Measurement Method Is Most Reliable?

作者信息

Costa Marco Túlio, Tejerina Javier Felipe Salinas, Silva Cesar Augusto Lima da, Rêgo Itallo Epaminondas de Queiroz, Bergamasco Jordanna Maria Pereira, Marchi Neto Noé De

机构信息

Grupo do Pé e Tornozelo, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2022 Jun 10;59(6):e907-e912. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1749620. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1749620
PMID:39711629
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11663077/
Abstract

To evaluate the methods of measuring leg-foot movement in normal ankles and feet by comparing the results of clinical measurements with those of radiographic measurement and to determine the range of leg-foot movement considered normal.  Leg-foot movement was measured in 44 patients (60 feet) using a traditional goniometer, digital goniometer, inclinometer, , in addition to radiographic measurement (considered gold standard). Maximum dorsiflexion was achieved by asking the patient to take a step forward with the contralateral foot and perform as much dorsiflexion as possible in the ankle studied without removing the heel from the ground. For maximum plantar flexion, the patient was asked to take a step back with the contralateral foot and make as much plantar flexion as possible without removing the studied forefoot from the ground.  The values obtained in radiographic measurement were higher than those obtained with clinical measurement. When we compared only the results of clinical measurement, the traditional goniometer was inaccurate. According to the radiographic method, the mean leg-foot range of motion was 65.6 degrees. The mean maximum plantar flexion was 34.9 degrees, and the mean maximum dorsiflexion was 30.7 degrees.  The most appropriate method for the evaluation of leg-foot range of motion is the radiographic one. The traditional goniometer proved to be the most imprecise clinical method. The mean leg-foot range of motion in healthy young adults was 65 degrees.

摘要

通过比较临床测量结果与影像学测量结果,评估正常踝关节和足部测量腿-足运动的方法,并确定正常的腿-足运动范围。 除影像学测量(视为金标准)外,使用传统测角仪、数字测角仪、倾角仪对44例患者(60只脚)进行腿-足运动测量。通过让患者用对侧脚向前迈一步,并在不使足跟离开地面的情况下,使所研究的踝关节尽可能多地背屈来实现最大背屈。对于最大跖屈,让患者用对侧脚向后迈一步,并在不使所研究的前足离开地面的情况下,尽可能多地进行跖屈。 影像学测量获得的值高于临床测量获得的值。当我们仅比较临床测量结果时,传统测角仪不准确。根据影像学方法,腿-足平均运动范围为65.6度。平均最大跖屈为34.9度,平均最大背屈为30.7度。 评估腿-足运动范围最合适的方法是影像学方法。传统测角仪被证明是最不精确的临床方法。健康年轻成年人的腿-足平均运动范围为65度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11663077/9cf6664837f3/10-1055-s-0042-1749620-i2100272pt-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11663077/b5b3e581400f/10-1055-s-0042-1749620-i2100272en-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11663077/f743d427890b/10-1055-s-0042-1749620-i2100272en-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11663077/149b2d4302ac/10-1055-s-0042-1749620-i2100272en-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11663077/bd6825319593/10-1055-s-0042-1749620-i2100272en-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11663077/5aac0242e2e0/10-1055-s-0042-1749620-i2100272en-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11663077/c863780569a8/10-1055-s-0042-1749620-i2100272pt-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11663077/bc773eac3d02/10-1055-s-0042-1749620-i2100272pt-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11663077/0da125bb1f52/10-1055-s-0042-1749620-i2100272pt-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11663077/aa396276217a/10-1055-s-0042-1749620-i2100272pt-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11663077/9cf6664837f3/10-1055-s-0042-1749620-i2100272pt-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11663077/b5b3e581400f/10-1055-s-0042-1749620-i2100272en-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11663077/f743d427890b/10-1055-s-0042-1749620-i2100272en-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11663077/149b2d4302ac/10-1055-s-0042-1749620-i2100272en-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11663077/bd6825319593/10-1055-s-0042-1749620-i2100272en-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11663077/5aac0242e2e0/10-1055-s-0042-1749620-i2100272en-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11663077/c863780569a8/10-1055-s-0042-1749620-i2100272pt-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11663077/bc773eac3d02/10-1055-s-0042-1749620-i2100272pt-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11663077/0da125bb1f52/10-1055-s-0042-1749620-i2100272pt-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11663077/aa396276217a/10-1055-s-0042-1749620-i2100272pt-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11663077/9cf6664837f3/10-1055-s-0042-1749620-i2100272pt-5.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Leg-foot Range of Motion: Which Measurement Method Is Most Reliable?下肢足部活动范围评估:哪种测量方法最可靠?
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2022 Jun 10;59(6):e907-e912. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1749620. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Comparison of Functional Ankle Motion Measures in Modern Dancers.现代舞者功能性踝关节运动测量的比较
J Dance Med Sci. 2012 Sep;16(3):116-25.
3
Validity of a Smartphone Application for Measuring Ankle Plantar Flexion.一款用于测量踝关节跖屈的智能手机应用程序的有效性
J Sport Rehabil. 2018 May 1;27(3). doi: 10.1123/jsr.2017-0143. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
4
The concurrent validity and reliability of the Leg Motion system for measuring ankle dorsiflexion range of motion in older adults.用于测量老年人踝关节背屈活动范围的腿部运动系统的同时效度和信度。
PeerJ. 2017 Jan 3;5:e2820. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2820. eCollection 2017.
5
Measurement properties of a hand-held inclinometer during straight leg raise neurodynamic testing.手持式倾斜计在直腿抬高神经动力学测试中的测量性能。
Physiotherapy. 2012 Jun;98(2):174-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2011.04.352. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
6
The validity and reliability of a new instrumented device for measuring ankle dorsiflexion range of motion.一种用于测量踝关节背屈活动范围的新型仪器设备的有效性和可靠性。
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Apr;10(2):197-202.
7
Experimental Comparison of the Clinical Measurement of Ankle Joint Dorsiflexion and Radiographic Tibiotalar Position.踝关节背屈临床测量与胫距关节影像学位置的实验比较
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Sep-Oct;56(5):1036-1040. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.008.
8
Measurement of the motion range in the loaded ankle.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985 Oct(199):68-71.
9
Weakness in end-range plantar flexion after Achilles tendon repair.跟腱修复术后终末位跖屈无力。
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Jul;34(7):1120-5. doi: 10.1177/0363546505284186. Epub 2006 Feb 13.
10
Calcaneal Plantar Flexion During the Stance Phase of Gait.步态站立期跟骨跖屈
J Appl Biomech. 2016 Apr;32(2):205-9. doi: 10.1123/jab.2015-0044. Epub 2015 Sep 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Smartphone Applications for Assessing Ankle Range of Motion in Clinical Practice.用于临床实践中评估踝关节活动范围的智能手机应用程序。
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2019 Sep 17;4(3):2473011419874779. doi: 10.1177/2473011419874779. eCollection 2019 Jul.
2
WITHIN-SESSION RELIABILITY FOR INTER-LIMB ASYMMETRIES IN ANKLE DORSIFLEXION RANGE OF MOTION MEASURED DURING THE WEIGHT-BEARING LUNGE TEST.负重弓步试验中测量的踝关节背屈活动度的双侧不对称性在测试过程中的组内可靠性。
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Feb;15(1):64-73.
3
Physical outcome measures: The role of strength and range of motion in orthopaedic research.
物理结果测量:力量和运动范围在骨科研究中的作用。
Injury. 2020 May;51 Suppl 2:S106-S110. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.11.017. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
4
A randomised cross over study to evaluate the performance of a novel ankle dorsiflexion measurement device for novice users.一项随机交叉研究,旨在评估一种新型踝关节背屈测量装置对新手用户的性能。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2018 Jul 31;11:45. doi: 10.1186/s13047-018-0286-x. eCollection 2018.
5
Sagittal Ankle and Midfoot Range of Motion Before and After Revision Total Ankle Replacement: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis.翻修全踝关节置换前后矢状面踝关节和中足活动范围:一项回顾性比较分析
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 May-Jun;57(3):521-526. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.11.017. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
6
Experimental Comparison of the Clinical Measurement of Ankle Joint Dorsiflexion and Radiographic Tibiotalar Position.踝关节背屈临床测量与胫距关节影像学位置的实验比较
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Sep-Oct;56(5):1036-1040. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.008.
7
Ratio of Range of Motion of the Ankle and Surrounding Joints After Total Ankle Replacement: A Radiographic Cohort Study.全踝关节置换术后踝关节及周围关节活动范围的比率:一项影像学队列研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Apr 5;99(7):576-582. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00606.
8
The concurrent validity and reliability of the Leg Motion system for measuring ankle dorsiflexion range of motion in older adults.用于测量老年人踝关节背屈活动范围的腿部运动系统的同时效度和信度。
PeerJ. 2017 Jan 3;5:e2820. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2820. eCollection 2017.
9
Validated Method for Measuring Functional Range of Motion in Patients With Ankle Arthritis.测量踝关节关节炎患者功能活动范围的验证方法。
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Aug;37(8):868-73. doi: 10.1177/1071100716645391. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
10
Reliability of three measures of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion.踝关节背屈活动度三种测量方法的可靠性
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;7(3):279-87.