Wiens Kirsten E, Miller Marissa H, Costello Daniel J, Solomon Ashlynn P, Hilbert Skye M, Shipper Andrea G, Lee Elizabeth C, Azman Andrew S
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
medRxiv. 2024 Dec 11:2024.12.11.24318799. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.11.24318799.
Monitoring and treating diarrheal illness often rely on individuals seeking care at hospitals or clinics. Cases that seek care through pharmacies and community health workers (CHW) are frequently excluded from disease burden estimates, which are used to allocate mitigation resources. Studies on care seeking behavior can help identify these gaps but typically focus on children under five, even though diarrheal diseases like cholera and Enterotoxigenic E. coli affect all age groups. This study aimed to estimate the proportion of individuals seeking care for themselves or their children with diarrhea, considering different age groups, case definitions, and study settings.
We conducted a systematic review of population-based primary research studies published during 2000-2024 that examined care-seeking behavior for diarrhea. We included 166 studies from 62 countries. Hospitals and clinics were the most common source of care sought outside the home, with CHW and health posts rarely reported. Using a random-effects meta-analysis, we found substantial heterogeneity in care seeking between studies from low- and middle-income countries (I = 99.3) and estimated that the proportion of diarrhea cases seeking care at a hospital or clinic was 32.8% on average (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 28.1% to 37.9%; prediction interval 3.3% to 87.5%). Although there were trends toward higher care-seeking for children compared to adults, substantial variation existed between studies, and the differences were not significant. We estimated that the adjusted odds of seeking care at a hospital or clinic were significantly higher for severe diarrhea and cholera compared to general diarrhea (Odds Ratio 3.43; 95% CI 1.71 to 6.88).
Our findings confirm that passive surveillance through hospitals and clinics may substantially undercount the number of people with diarrhea, particularly those with milder symptoms, although this proportion varied widely. Additionally, our findings underscore the importance of including care seeking questions across all age groups in future studies, as we cannot assume lower care seeking for adults across all settings. Our study was limited by fewer data on care-seeking from health posts, traditional healers, and CHW compared to hospitals and clinics, highlighting a need for further research on these sources of care.
腹泻疾病的监测与治疗通常依赖于前往医院或诊所就医的个体。通过药店和社区卫生工作者(CHW)寻求治疗的病例常常被排除在用于分配缓解资源的疾病负担估计之外。关于就医行为的研究有助于识别这些差距,但通常聚焦于五岁以下儿童,尽管霍乱和产肠毒素大肠杆菌等腹泻疾病会影响所有年龄组。本研究旨在估计不同年龄组、病例定义和研究环境下,为自己或孩子的腹泻寻求治疗的个体比例。
我们对2000年至2024年期间发表的基于人群的原发性研究进行了系统综述,这些研究考察了腹泻的就医行为。我们纳入了来自62个国家的166项研究。医院和诊所是最常见的院外就医来源,很少有关于社区卫生工作者和卫生站的报告。通过随机效应荟萃分析,我们发现低收入和中等收入国家的研究在就医行为上存在显著异质性(I = 99.3),并估计在医院或诊所寻求治疗的腹泻病例比例平均为32.8%(95%置信区间(CI)28.1%至37.9%;预测区间3.3%至87.5%)。虽然与成人相比,儿童的就医趋势有所增加,但研究之间存在很大差异,且差异不显著。我们估计,与一般腹泻相比,严重腹泻和霍乱在医院或诊所寻求治疗的调整后比值显著更高(比值比3.43;95% CI 1.71至6.88)。
我们的研究结果证实,通过医院和诊所进行的被动监测可能会大幅低估腹泻患者的数量,尤其是症状较轻的患者,尽管这一比例差异很大。此外,我们的研究结果强调了在未来研究中纳入所有年龄组就医问题的重要性,因为我们不能假设在所有情况下成人的就医率都较低。与医院和诊所相比,我们的研究受到来自卫生站、传统治疗师和社区卫生工作者的就医数据较少的限制,这凸显了对这些就医来源进行进一步研究的必要性。