Suppr超能文献

牛手术中的术前皮肤无菌处理:在非无菌手术室条件下进行的一项结局设盲的三臂随机临床试验。

Preoperative skin asepsis in bovine surgery: an outcome-blinded 3-arm randomized clinical trial under non-sterile operating room conditions.

作者信息

Marchionatti Emma, Constant Caroline, Steiner Adrian

机构信息

Clinic for Ruminants, Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Graduate School for Health Sciences (GHS), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Vet Sci. 2024 Dec 6;11:1446649. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1446649. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSI) following clean abdominal surgery in cattle pose significant economic and welfare concerns. Preoperative skin asepsis aims to minimize microbial load over the surgical field before and throughout surgery to minimize its risk. While chlorhexidine (CHX) and povidone-iodine (PVI) are commonly used antiseptics for this purpose, our study introduces the so far unexplored use of octenidine (OCT) in veterinary surgery.

METHODS

We compared in a single-center, prospective, randomized, outcome-blinded, 3-arm trial the effectiveness of an OCT-based protocol to CHX- and PVI-based protocols. Cattle aged 2 years or older, needing a clean standing flank laparotomy (e.g., exploratory laparotomy, right flank omentopexy, left flank abomasopexy), were eligible. Exclusion criteria comprised skin abnormalities, recent antibiotic use, or debilitating conditions with systemic involvement or distant site infections. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 with concealed allocation using unique identifiers. Skin bacterial reduction (immediate [IRF] and delayed [DRF] reduction factors), SSI rate, and wound scores were evaluated. Wound scores were rated on a 0 to 6 scale, considering the presence and severity of discharge and swelling.

RESULTS

Out of 373 assessed cattle, 126 were included and randomized: PVI ( = 42), CHX ( = 41), OCT ( = 43). All protocols significantly reduced bacterial counts, with PVI exhibiting lower IRF. No significant differences were observed in DRF. The summer season and duration of surgical procedures had a negative impact on IRF and DRF in all groups, respectively. Nine of 118 patients (7.6%) with complete follow-up developed SSI. Higher wound scores were associated with development of SSI. Wound scores ≥3 at day 10 postoperatively predicted SSI with high sensitivity and specificity. Microbial flora in SSI included typical skin bacteria and opportunistic pathogens.

CONCLUSION

All protocols met minimum FDA standards in reducing bacterial colonization. While limited by sample size and single-center design, this study confirms the OCT-based protocol as a valuable option for preoperative skin asepsis in clean abdominal bovine surgery.

摘要

背景

牛的清洁腹部手术后手术部位感染(SSI)引发了重大的经济和福利问题。术前皮肤无菌操作旨在在手术前及整个手术过程中尽量减少手术区域的微生物负荷,以降低感染风险。虽然洗必泰(CHX)和聚维酮碘(PVI)是常用于此目的的防腐剂,但我们的研究介绍了辛二胍(OCT)在兽医手术中迄今未被探索的用途。

方法

在一项单中心、前瞻性、随机、结果盲法的三臂试验中,我们比较了基于OCT的方案与基于CHX和PVI的方案的有效性。年龄在2岁及以上、需要进行清洁的站立式侧腹剖腹术(如 exploratory laparotomy,右侧腹网膜固定术,左侧腹皱胃固定术)的牛符合条件。排除标准包括皮肤异常、近期使用过抗生素,或患有全身性受累或远处部位感染的虚弱病症。使用唯一标识符对患者进行1:1:1随机分组并采用隐藏分配。评估皮肤细菌减少情况(即时[IRF]和延迟[DRF]减少因子)、SSI发生率和伤口评分。伤口评分采用0至6分制,考虑分泌物和肿胀的存在及严重程度。

结果

在373头评估的牛中,126头被纳入并随机分组:PVI组(n = 42)、CHX组(n = 41)、OCT组(n = 43)。所有方案均显著降低了细菌数量,PVI组的即时减少因子较低。在延迟减少因子方面未观察到显著差异。夏季和手术时间分别对所有组的即时减少因子和延迟减少因子有负面影响。118例接受完整随访的患者中有9例(7.6%)发生了SSI。较高的伤口评分与SSI的发生相关。术后第10天伤口评分≥3分对SSI具有较高的敏感性和特异性。SSI中的微生物菌群包括典型的皮肤细菌和机会性病原体。

结论

所有方案在减少细菌定植方面均达到了美国食品药品监督管理局的最低标准。尽管受到样本量和单中心设计的限制,但本研究证实基于OCT的方案是牛清洁腹部手术术前皮肤无菌操作的一个有价值的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6234/11660802/0646b260dc55/fvets-11-1446649-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验