Wang Xiaoyu, Lin Li, Zhan Lei, Sun Xianghong, Huang Zheng, Zhang Liang
Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Cogn Neurodyn. 2024 Dec;18(6):3995-4007. doi: 10.1007/s11571-024-10174-1. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
Stress is ubiquitous in daily life. Subcortical and cortical regions closely interact to respond to stress. Delta-beta cross-frequency coupling (CFC), believed to signify communication between different brain areas, can serve as a neural signature underlying the heterogeneity in stress responses. Nevertheless, the role of cross-frequency coupling in stress prediction has not received sufficient attention. To examine the predictive role of resting state delta-beta CFC across the whole scalp, we obtained amplitude-amplitude coupling (AAC) and phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) from 4-minute resting state EEG of seventy-three healthy participants. The Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) was administered on a separate day to induce stress. Salivary cortisol and heart rate were recorded to measure stress responses. Utilizing cluster-based permutation analysis, the results showed that delta-beta AAC was positively correlated with cortisol increase magnitude (cluster = 26.012, = .020) and cortisol AUCi (cluster = 23.039, = .022) over parietal-occipital areas, which means that individuals with a stronger within-subject AAC demonstrated a greater cortisol response. These results suggest that AAC could be a valuable biomarker for predicting neuroendocrine activity under stress. However, no association between PAC and stress responses was found. Additionally, we did not detect the predictive effect of power in the delta or beta frequency bands on stress responses, suggesting that delta-beta AAC provides unique insights beyond single-band power. These findings enhance our understanding of the neurophysiological mechanism underpinning individual differences in stress responses and offer promising biomarkers for stress assessment and the detection of stress-related disorders.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-024-10174-1.
压力在日常生活中无处不在。皮层下和皮层区域紧密相互作用以应对压力。被认为表示不同脑区之间通信的δ-β交叉频率耦合(CFC),可作为压力反应异质性的神经特征。然而,交叉频率耦合在压力预测中的作用尚未得到充分关注。为了研究静息状态下全头皮δ-β CFC的预测作用,我们从73名健康参与者4分钟的静息状态脑电图中获得了幅度-幅度耦合(AAC)和相位-幅度耦合(PAC)。在另一天进行了特里尔社会压力测试(TSST)以诱导压力。记录唾液皮质醇和心率以测量压力反应。利用基于聚类的置换分析,结果表明,顶枕区域的δ-β AAC与皮质醇增加幅度(聚类=26.012,P=0.020)和皮质醇AUCi(聚类=23.039,P=0.022)呈正相关,这意味着个体内AAC越强,皮质醇反应越大。这些结果表明,AAC可能是预测压力下神经内分泌活动的有价值的生物标志物。然而,未发现PAC与压力反应之间的关联。此外,我们未检测到δ或β频段功率对压力反应的预测作用,这表明δ-β AAC提供了超越单频段功率的独特见解。这些发现增强了我们对压力反应个体差异背后神经生理机制的理解,并为压力评估和与压力相关疾病的检测提供了有前景的生物标志物。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s11571-024-10174-1获取的补充材料。