Seif El-Din Zeinab, Afify Mohammed, Zayed Essam, Elsabaawy Dalia, Tharwa El Sayed, Elsharawy Ahmed, Abdelsameea Eman, Rady Mohamed Akl
Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Kom 32511, Egypt.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmacy College, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Kom 32511, Egypt.
World J Exp Med. 2024 Dec 20;14(4):95272. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v14.i4.95272.
The use of dapagliflozin in patients with cirrhosis has been relatively restricted due to concerns regarding its overall safety and pharmacological profile in this population.
To determine the safety and effectiveness of dapagliflozin in the co-management of diabetes mellitus and cirrhosis with or without ascites.
The patients studied were divided into two groups: 100 patients in the control group received insulin, while 200 patients received dapagliflozin. These patients were classified as Child A, B, or C based on the Child-Pugh classification. Child A or B and Child C were administered doses of 10 mg and 5 mg of dapagliflozin, respectively.
The rate of increased diuretics dose was markedly elevated in the group that received insulin compared to the group that received dapagliflozin. In addition, dapagliflozin treatment substantially reduced weight, body mass index, and fasting blood glucose compared to the insulin group during follow-up. However, there were no significant differences in hemoglobin A1c, liver function, or laboratory investigations between both groups during the follow-up period. The incidence of hypoglycemia, hepatic encephalopathy, variceal bleeding, and urinary tract infection was significantly higher in the insulin group compared to the dapagliflozin group. In contrast, the dapagliflozin group experienced significantly higher rates of frequent urination and dizziness. In addition, the insulin group exhibited a marked worsening of ascites compared to the dapagliflozin group.
Dapagliflozin demonstrated safety and efficacy in the treatment of diabetic patients who have cirrhosis with or without ascites. This resulted in an improvement of ascites, as well as a decrease in diuretic dose and Child-Pugh score.
由于对达格列净在肝硬化患者中的总体安全性和药理学特征存在担忧,其在该人群中的使用相对受限。
确定达格列净在合并或不合并腹水的糖尿病和肝硬化共同管理中的安全性和有效性。
研究对象分为两组:100例对照组患者接受胰岛素治疗,200例患者接受达格列净治疗。这些患者根据Child-Pugh分类分为A、B或C级。Child A或B级以及Child C级患者分别给予10 mg和5 mg的达格列净剂量。
与接受达格列净的组相比,接受胰岛素治疗的组利尿剂剂量增加率显著升高。此外,与胰岛素组相比,达格列净治疗在随访期间显著降低了体重、体重指数和空腹血糖。然而,在随访期间两组之间糖化血红蛋白、肝功能或实验室检查方面没有显著差异。胰岛素组低血糖、肝性脑病、静脉曲张出血和尿路感染的发生率显著高于达格列净组。相比之下,达格列净组尿频和头晕的发生率显著更高。此外,与达格列净组相比,胰岛素组腹水明显恶化。
达格列净在治疗合并或不合并腹水的肝硬化糖尿病患者中显示出安全性和有效性。这导致腹水改善,利尿剂剂量和Child-Pugh评分降低。