Validation and modification of existing bleeding complications prediction models for percutaneous renal biopsy: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND

Bleeding complications following percutaneous renal biopsy (PRB) are a significant clinical concern. This study aimed to validate and refine existing prediction models for post-biopsy bleeding to support more accurate clinical decision-making.

METHODS

Clinical data from 471 PRB patients were examined in this prospective analysis. Ultrasounds were performed immediately and 6 h post-biopsy to identify perinephric hematomas. Patients exhibiting severe pain, a hemoglobin drop of >10 g/L, symptomatic hypotension, hematuria within 7 days post-procedure underwent repeat ultrasound to assess for bleeding complications. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with bleeding risk. The predictive performance of three kidney biopsy risk calculators (KBRC) was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and decision curve analysis (DCA) to determine clinical utility. Nomograms were developed for each model to facilitate clinical application.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis identified body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin, and ultrasound findings as significant predictors of bleeding complications. In multivariable analysis, BMI, immediate ultrasound, and 6-h ultrasound data remained significant ( < 0.05). The three models compared included: KBRC-5 (age, body mass index (BMI), platelet count, hemoglobin, kidney size), KBRC-5 with immediate ultrasound data (IKBRC), and KBRC-5 with 6-h hematoma size (SKBRC). The AUROC values for these models were 0.683, 0.786, and 0.867, respectively ( < 0.001). NRI and IDI analyses demonstrated that adding immediate or 6-h ultrasound data significantly improved the risk reclassification ability of the KBRC-5 model ( < 0.05). DCA indicated that IKBRC provided the highest net benefit for risk thresholds between 25% and 77%, while SKBRC was superior for thresholds between 10% and 95%. Nomograms were constructed for each model, allowing clinicians to estimate the probability of bleeding complications by summing scores for each predictor. Calibration curves showed good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities.

CONCLUSION

Incorporating real-time ultrasound data post-PRB significantly enhances the predictive accuracy and risk reclassification capability of bleeding risk models. These findings provide critical insights for guiding clinical management decisions in patients undergoing renal biopsy.