Cornejo-Daza Pedro Jesús, Sánchez-Valdepeñas Juan, Páez-Maldonado Jose, Rodiles-Guerrero Luis, Sánchez-Moreno Miguel, Gómez-Guerrero Gonzálo, León-Prados Juan A, Pareja-Blanco Fernando
Science Based Training Research Group, Department of Sports and Computers Sciences, Pablo de Olavide University, Seville, Spain.
Department of Sports and Computers Sciences, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Pablo de Olavide University, Seville, Spain.
J Strength Cond Res. 2025 Mar 1;39(3):307-317. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000005021. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
Cornejo-Daza, PJ, Sánchez-Valdepeñas, J, Páez-Maldonado, J, Rodiles-Guerrero, L, Sánchez-Moreno, M, Gómez-Guerrero, G, León-Prados, JA, and Pareja-Blanco, F. Acute responses to different lifting velocities during squat training with and without blood flow restriction. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): 307-317, 2025-The aims of the research were to compare the acute mechanical, metabolic, neuromuscular, and muscle mechanical responses to different lifting velocities (maximal vs. half-maximal) under distinct blood flow conditions (free [FF] vs. restricted [BFR]) in full-squat (SQ). Twenty resistance-trained males performed 4 protocols that differed in the velocity at which loads were lifted (MaxV: maximal velocity vs. HalfV: half-maximal velocity) and in the blood flow condition (FF: free-flow vs. BFR: 50% of arterial occlusion pressure). The relative intensity (60% 1 repetition maximum), volume (3 sets of 8 repetitions), and resting time (2 minutes) were matched between protocols. Mean propulsive force (MPF), mean propulsive velocity (MPV), mean propulsive power (MPP), and electromyography (EMG) values were recorded for each repetition. Tensiomyography (TMG), blood lactate, countermovement jump (CMJ), maximal voluntary isometric contraction in 90° SQ, and performance with the load that elicited a 1-m·s -1 velocity at baseline measurements (V1-load) in SQ were assessed at pre-exercise and postexercise. The MaxV protocols showed significantly greater MPF, MPV, MPP, and EMG amplitude during the exercise than the HalfV protocols (velocity effect, p < 0.05). The FF protocols achieved higher MPF and MPP during exercise than BFR (BFR effect, p < 0.05). The BFR protocols induced greater blood lactate after exercise (BFR × time interaction, p = 0.02), along with higher postexercise impairments in mechanical performance (BFR × time interaction, p < 0.05). The MaxV protocols elicited superior performance and greater muscle activation during exercise. The BFR protocols resulted in lower force and power production during exercise and exhibited higher performance impairments and increased metabolic stress postexercise.
科内霍 - 达萨,PJ、桑切斯 - 巴尔德佩尼亚斯,J、派斯 - 马尔多纳多,J、罗迪莱斯 - 格雷罗,L、桑切斯 - 莫雷诺,M、戈麦斯 - 格雷罗,G、莱昂 - 普拉多斯,JA和帕雷亚 - 布兰科,F。有无血流限制情况下深蹲训练中对不同提升速度的急性反应。《力量与体能研究杂志》39(3): 307 - 317,2025年 - 本研究的目的是比较在不同血流条件(自由[FF]与受限[BFR])下,全蹲(SQ)时对不同提升速度(最大速度与半最大速度)的急性机械、代谢、神经肌肉和肌肉机械反应。20名经过抗阻训练的男性进行了4种方案,这些方案在负荷提升速度(最大速度[MaxV]与半最大速度[HalfV])和血流条件(自由流动[FF]与50%动脉闭塞压力的BFR)方面有所不同。各方案之间的相对强度(60% 1次重复最大值)、训练量(3组,每组8次重复)和休息时间(2分钟)相匹配。记录每次重复的平均推进力(MPF)、平均推进速度(MPV)、平均推进功率(MPP)和肌电图(EMG)值。在运动前和运动后评估张力肌电图(TMG)、血乳酸、反向运动跳跃(CMJ)、90°深蹲时的最大自主等长收缩以及在基线测量(V1 - 负荷)时能产生1 m·s⁻¹速度的负荷下的深蹲表现。与HalfV方案相比(速度效应,p < 0.05),MaxV方案在运动过程中显示出显著更高的MPF、MPV、MPP和EMG幅度。与BFR相比(BFR效应,p < 0.05),FF方案在运动过程中实现了更高的MPF和MPP。BFR方案在运动后诱导产生更高的血乳酸(BFR×时间交互作用,p = 0.02),同时在运动后机械性能方面有更高的损伤(BFR×时间交互作用,p < 0.05)。MaxV方案在运动过程中表现出更优的性能和更大的肌肉激活。BFR方案在运动过程中导致更低的力量和功率产生,并且在运动后表现出更高的性能损伤和增加的代谢应激。