• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Anterior Gastropexy for Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial.前位胃固定术治疗食管旁疝:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Surg. 2025 Mar 1;160(3):247-255. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5788.
2
Comparing anterior gastropexy to no anterior gastropexy for paraesophageal hernia repair: a study protocol for a randomized control trial.比较胃前固定术与非胃前固定术治疗食管裂孔疝修补术的效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Jul 30;23(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06571-8.
3
No advantage of fundoplication in paraesophageal hernia repair: a retrospective multicenter study.食管旁疝修补术中胃底折叠术无优势:一项回顾性多中心研究
Dis Esophagus. 2025 May 3;38(3). doi: 10.1093/dote/doaf036.
4
Outcomes after Laparoscopic Gastropexy as an Alternative for Paraesophageal Hernia Repair.腹腔镜胃固定术作为治疗食管旁疝的一种替代方法的结果。
JSLS. 2020 Oct-Dec;24(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00059.
5
Acute Paraesophageal Hernia: Laparoscopic Repair With Adjunct T-Fastener Gastropexy for the High Operative Risk Patient.急性食管旁疝:腹腔镜修补联合T形吻合器胃固定术治疗高手术风险患者
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018 Apr;28(2):123-127. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000509.
6
Anterior gastropexy may reduce the recurrence rate after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.前位胃固定术可能会降低腹腔镜食管旁疝修补术后的复发率。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jul;17(7):1036-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8765-2. Epub 2003 Mar 28.
7
Laparoscopic revision paraesophageal hernia repair: a 16-year experience at a single institution.腹腔镜下复发性食管旁疝修补术:一家机构16年的经验
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jan;37(1):624-630. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09359-8. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
8
The role of gastropexy in paraesophageal hernia repair: A scoping review of current evidence.胃固定术在食管旁疝修补术中的作用:当前证据的范围综述
Surgeon. 2025 Feb;23(1):e21-e31. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2024.10.001. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
9
Effectiveness of anterior gastropexy with mesh reinforcement in reducing the recurrence of giant hiatal hernia.采用补片加强的前路胃固定术在降低巨大食管裂孔疝复发率方面的有效性。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun;39(6):3484-3491. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11721-5. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
10
Minimally Invasive Paraesophageal Hernia Repair in the Elderly: Is Age Really Just a Number?老年人微创食管裂孔疝修补术:年龄真的只是一个数字吗?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Feb;32(2):111-117. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0792. Epub 2021 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic Hiatal Repair and Gastropexy without Fundoplication of Hiatal Hernia in Elderly Patients with High Dysphagia Score: A Case Series of Four Patients.老年吞咽困难评分高的食管裂孔疝患者行无胃底折叠术的腹腔镜食管裂孔修补术和胃固定术:4例病例系列
Surg Case Rep. 2025;11(1). doi: 10.70352/scrj.cr.25-0235. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
2
No advantage of fundoplication in paraesophageal hernia repair: a retrospective multicenter study.食管旁疝修补术中胃底折叠术无优势:一项回顾性多中心研究
Dis Esophagus. 2025 May 3;38(3). doi: 10.1093/dote/doaf036.
3
Giant Paraesophageal Hernia Presenting With Dyspnea: A Case Report With Surgical Considerations.以呼吸困难为表现的巨大食管旁疝:一例报告及手术考量
Cureus. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):e81273. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81273. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Elective Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair Leads to an Increase in Life Expectancy Over Watchful Waiting in Asymptomatic Patients: An Updated Markov Analysis.择期腹腔镜膈疝修补术可提高无症状患者的预期寿命:更新的马尔可夫分析。
Ann Surg. 2024 Feb 1;279(2):267-275. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006119. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
2
The Impact of Age and Need for Emergent Surgery in Paraesophageal Hernia Repair Outcomes.年龄和紧急手术需求对食管裂孔疝修补术结果的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Jul;116(1):138-145. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.01.017. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
3
Comparing anterior gastropexy to no anterior gastropexy for paraesophageal hernia repair: a study protocol for a randomized control trial.比较胃前固定术与非胃前固定术治疗食管裂孔疝修补术的效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Jul 30;23(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06571-8.
4
Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: To Mesh or not to Mesh. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术:是否使用补片?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2022 Jan 1;275(1):67-72. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004913.
5
A multi-center, prospective clinical trial of a hepatic derived porcine surgical mesh for the laparoscopic repair of symptomatic paraesophageal hernias.多中心前瞻性临床试验:应用肝源性猪医用修补网片腹腔镜修复食管裂孔疝。
Am J Surg. 2019 Aug;218(2):315-322. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.03.025. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
6
Long-term quality of life and risk factors for recurrence after laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia.腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术后的长期生活质量和复发风险因素。
JAMA Surg. 2015 May;150(5):424-31. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.25.
7
The comprehensive complication index: a novel and more sensitive endpoint for assessing outcome and reducing sample size in randomized controlled trials.综合并发症指数:一种评估结局和减少随机对照试验样本量的新的、更敏感的终点。
Ann Surg. 2014 Nov;260(5):757-62; discussion 762-3. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000948.
8
Laparoscopic versus open repair of paraesophageal hernia: the second decade.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗食管裂孔疝:第二个十年。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 May;212(5):813-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.060. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
9
Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Long-term follow-up reveals good clinical outcome despite high radiological recurrence rate.腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术。长期随访显示,尽管放射影像学复发率较高,但临床结果良好。
Ann Surg. 2011 Feb;253(2):291-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ff44c0.
10
Laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia without prosthetic reinforcement: late results and relevance of anterior gastropexy.腹腔镜修补无假体强化的巨大食管裂孔疝:远期结果和前胃固定术的相关性。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Dec;14(12):1910-6. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1308-6. Epub 2010 Sep 8.

前位胃固定术治疗食管旁疝:一项随机临床试验

Anterior Gastropexy for Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Petro Clayton C, Ellis Ryan C, Maskal Sara M, Zolin Sam J, Tu Chao, Costanzo Adele, Beffa Lucas R A, Krpata David M, Alaedeen Diya, Prabhu Ajita S, Miller Benjamin T, Baier Kevin F, Fathalizadeh Alisan, Rodriguez John, Rosen Michael J

机构信息

Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2025 Mar 1;160(3):247-255. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5788.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5788
PMID:39714889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11904718/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Paraesophageal hernias can cause severe limitations in quality of life and life-threatening complications. Even though minimally invasive paraesophageal hernia repair (MIS-PEHR) is safe and effective, anatomic recurrence rates remain notoriously high. Retrospective data suggest that suturing the stomach to the anterior abdominal wall after repair-an anterior gastropexy-may reduce recurrence, but this adjunct is currently not the standard of care.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether anterior gastropexy reduces 1-year recurrence after MIS-PEHR.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This registry-based randomized clinical trial was conducted by 10 surgeons at 3 academic hospitals within the Cleveland Clinic Enterprise. Between June 26, 2019, and July 24, 2023, 348 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 240 patients were enrolled and randomized. Statistical analysis was performed from January to March 2024.

INTERVENTION

Enrolled patients were randomized to and received either an anterior gastropexy (n = 119) or no anterior gastropexy (n = 121).

MAIN OUTCOME

The primary outcome was recurrence as determined by reherniation of the stomach greater than 2 cm above the diaphragm on routine imaging at 1 year or reoperation. Secondary outcomes included quality of life as measured by the Gastroesophageal Reflux Health-Related Quality of Life survey, additional foregut symptom questionnaire, and patient satisfaction at 30 days and 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 240 patients were randomized to either anterior gastropexy (n = 119; 104 [97%] women; median [IQR] age, 70 [64-75] years) or no anterior gastropexy (n = 121; 97 [80%] women; median [IQR] age, 68 [62-73] years) at the end of their MIS-PEHR. At 1 year, 188 patients (78%) had completed follow-up. By intention-to-treat analysis, 1-year recurrence was significantly lower in patients who received an anterior gastropexy (15% vs 36%; risk difference, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.09-0.33]), which remained significant after risk-adjusted regression analysis (hazard ratio, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.23-0.60]). Of 13 reoperations (5.4%) for recurrence in the first year, 3 (2.5%) were in the anterior gastropexy group and 10 (8.2%) were in the no-gastropexy group (P = .052). Two patients (1.7%) had their anterior gastropexy sutures removed for pain. There were no significant differences in quality-of-life outcomes at 30 days and 1 year between treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This randomized clinical trial found that the addition of an anterior gastropexy to MIS-PEHR is superior to no gastropexy in regard to reducing 1-year paraesophageal hernia recurrence. These results suggest that an anterior gastropexy should be routinely used in the context of minimally invasive paraesophageal hernia repair.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04007952.

摘要

重要性

食管旁疝可导致生活质量严重受限并引发危及生命的并发症。尽管微创食管旁疝修补术(MIS - PEHR)安全有效,但解剖学复发率仍然居高不下。回顾性数据表明,修补术后将胃缝合至前腹壁——即前胃固定术——可能会降低复发率,但目前这种辅助手段并非标准治疗方法。

目的

确定前胃固定术是否能降低MIS - PEHR术后1年的复发率。

设计、设置和参与者:这项基于注册登记的随机临床试验由克利夫兰诊所企业旗下3家学术医院的10名外科医生进行。在2019年6月26日至2023年7月24日期间,对348例患者进行了资格评估,240例患者入组并随机分组。于2024年1月至3月进行统计分析。

干预措施

入组患者被随机分配并接受前胃固定术(n = 119)或不接受前胃固定术(n = 121)。

主要结局

主要结局是通过1年时常规影像学检查发现胃在膈肌上方2 cm以上再次疝出或再次手术确定的复发情况。次要结局包括通过胃食管反流健康相关生活质量调查问卷、额外的前肠症状问卷以及30天和1年时的患者满意度来衡量的生活质量。

结果

共有240例患者在完成MIS - PEHR后被随机分配接受前胃固定术(n = 119;104例[97%]为女性;年龄中位数[四分位间距],70岁[64 - 75岁])或不接受前胃固定术(n = 121;97例[80%]为女性;年龄中位数[四分位间距],68岁[62 - 73岁])。1年时,188例患者(78%)完成了随访。按意向性分析,接受前胃固定术的患者1年复发率显著更低(15%对36%;风险差异,0.21[95%置信区间,0.09 - 0.33]),在风险调整回归分析后仍具有显著性(风险比,0.38[95%置信区间,0.23 - 0.60])。在第一年因复发进行的13例再次手术(5.4%)中,3例(2.5%)在前胃固定术组,10例(8.2%)在未行胃固定术组(P = 0.052)。2例患者(1.7%)因疼痛拆除了前胃固定术缝线。治疗组之间在30天和1年时的生活质量结局无显著差异。

结论及意义

这项随机临床试验发现,在MIS - PEHR中增加前胃固定术在降低食管旁疝1年复发率方面优于不进行胃固定术。这些结果表明,在前胃固定术应常规用于微创食管旁疝修补术中。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04007952