Urakawa Shinya, Yoshimura Daishi, Sakata Kazuya, Ikeda Kimimasa, Miyazaki Satoru
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Habikino Medical Center, Habikino, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Minoh City Hospital, Minoh, Osaka, Japan.
Surg Case Rep. 2025;11(1). doi: 10.70352/scrj.cr.25-0235. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
Hiatal repair with fundoplication for hiatal hernia (HH) could cause postoperative dysphagia. In the aging society, the number of patients with HH type III/IV and severe dysphagia is increasing. In this case, the surgical priority is to resolve the dysphagia. Recent papers have reported that laparoscopic hiatal repair without fundoplication can be an alternative procedure. Nevertheless, the indication for hiatal repair without fundoplication should be carefully considered.
We performed laparoscopic hiatal repair and gastropexy without fundoplication in four patients with HH type III and high dysphagia scores. The median age was 84 (range 81-96) years, and the median values in the updated Charlson Comorbidity Index (uCCI) were 2 (2-5). Dysphagia scores were high (3, n = 2 and 4, n = 2). The media operative time was 196 (57-249) minutes, and the postoperative hospital stay was 9.5 (8-12) days. Only one case experienced HH recurrence (Type I) on endoscopy and computed tomography but did not have heartburn or dysphagia while on medication. The FSSG scores significantly decreased from 29 (26-35) to 4 (0-7) after surgery (p = 0.0035). Compared with those of four patients who underwent conventional surgeries (hiatal repair with Nissen fundoplication) during the same period, patients undergoing hiatal repair and gastropexy without fundoplication were relatively older (84 [81-96] vs. 74.5 [72-79]), had higher uCCI values (2 [2-5] vs. 1 [0-2]), and higher dysphagia scores (3.5 [3-4] vs. 1 [0-1]). However, there were no differences in the surgical outcomes and postoperative FSSG scores.
Laparoscopic hiatal repair and gastropexy without fundoplication is feasible in elderly patients with HH type III and high dysphagia scores.
采用胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝(HH)可能导致术后吞咽困难。在老龄化社会中,III/IV型HH和严重吞咽困难患者的数量正在增加。在这种情况下,手术的首要任务是解决吞咽困难问题。最近的论文报道,不进行胃底折叠术的腹腔镜食管裂孔修补术可能是一种替代手术方式。然而,对于不进行胃底折叠术的食管裂孔修补术的适应证应仔细考虑。
我们对4例III型HH和吞咽困难评分较高的患者进行了不进行胃底折叠术的腹腔镜食管裂孔修补术和胃固定术。患者的中位年龄为84岁(范围81 - 96岁),更新后的Charlson合并症指数(uCCI)的中位值为2(2 - 5)。吞咽困难评分较高(3分,2例;4分,2例)。中位手术时间为196分钟(57 - 249分钟),术后住院时间为9.5天(8 - 12天)。仅1例在内镜检查和计算机断层扫描时出现HH复发(I型),但在药物治疗期间无烧心或吞咽困难症状。术后FSSG评分从术前的29分(26 - 35分)显著降至4分(0 - 7分)(p = 0.0035)。与同期接受传统手术(nissen胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔)的4例患者相比,接受不进行胃底折叠术的食管裂孔修补术和胃固定术的患者年龄相对较大(84岁[81 - 96岁] vs. 74.5岁[72 - 79岁]),uCCI值较高(2[2 - 5] vs. 1[0 - 2]),吞咽困难评分较高(3.5分[3 - 4分] vs. 1分[0 - 1分])。然而,手术结果和术后FSSG评分并无差异。
对于III型HH和吞咽困难评分较高的老年患者,不进行胃底折叠术的腹腔镜食管裂孔修补术和胃固定术是可行的。