Pajka Sarah E, Hasdianda Mohammad Adrian, George Naomi, Sudore Rebecca, Schonberg Mara A, Bernstein Edward, Tulsky James A, Block Susan D, Ouchi Kei
Department of Emergency Medicine and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2021 Jan;24(1):31-39. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0067. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
Advance care planning (ACP) conversations are an important intervention to provide care consistent with patient goals near the end of life. The emergency department (ED) could serve as an important time and location for these conversations. To determine the feasibility of an ED-based, brief negotiated interview (BNI) to stimulate ACP conversations among seriously ill older adults. We conducted a pre/postintervention study in the ED of an urban, tertiary care, academic medical center. From November 2017 to May 2019, we prospectively enrolled adults ≥65 years of age with serious illness. Trained clinicians conducted the intervention. We measured patients' ACP engagement at baseline and follow-up (3 ± 1 weeks) and reviewed electronic medical record documentation of ACP (e.g., medical order for life-sustaining treatment [MOLST]). We enrolled 51 patients (mean age = 71; SD 12), 41% were female, and 51% of patients had metastatic cancer. Median duration of the intervention was 11.8 minutes; few (6%) of the interventions were interrupted. We completed follow-up for 61% of participants. Patients' self-reported ACP engagement increased from 3.0 to 3.7 out of 5 after the intervention ( < 0.01). Electronic documentation of health care proxy forms increased (75%-94%, = 48) as did MOLST (0%-19%, = 48) during the six months after the ED visit. A novel, ED-based, BNI intervention to stimulate ACP conversations for seriously ill older adults is feasible and may improve ACP engagement and documentation.
预先护理计划(ACP)谈话是一项重要干预措施,可在患者生命末期提供符合其目标的护理。急诊科(ED)可以成为进行这些谈话的重要时机和场所。为了确定基于急诊科的简短协商访谈(BNI)在重症老年患者中促进ACP谈话的可行性,我们在一家城市三级医疗学术医学中心的急诊科进行了一项干预前后研究。2017年11月至2019年5月,我们前瞻性纳入了年龄≥65岁的重症成年患者。经过培训的临床医生实施干预措施。我们在基线和随访时(3±1周)测量患者的ACP参与度,并查看ACP的电子病历记录(例如,维持生命治疗医嘱[MOLST])。我们纳入了51例患者(平均年龄=71岁;标准差12),41%为女性,51%的患者患有转移性癌症。干预的中位持续时间为11.8分钟;很少有干预(6%)被中断。我们对61%的参与者完成了随访。干预后,患者自我报告的ACP参与度从5分中的3.0分提高到了3.7分(P<0.01)。在急诊科就诊后的六个月内,医疗保健代理人表格的电子记录增加了(75%-94%,P=48),MOLST记录也增加了(0%-19%,P=48)。一种基于急诊科的新型BNI干预措施,用于促进重症老年患者的ACP谈话是可行的,并且可能会提高ACP参与度和记录。