Suppr超能文献

急诊科针对患有危及生命疾病的患者进行简短干预以促进预立医疗计划对话的可行性。

Feasibility of a Brief Intervention to Facilitate Advance Care Planning Conversations for Patients with Life-Limiting Illness in the Emergency Department.

作者信息

Pajka Sarah E, Hasdianda Mohammad Adrian, George Naomi, Sudore Rebecca, Schonberg Mara A, Bernstein Edward, Tulsky James A, Block Susan D, Ouchi Kei

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2021 Jan;24(1):31-39. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0067. Epub 2020 Jun 1.

Abstract

Advance care planning (ACP) conversations are an important intervention to provide care consistent with patient goals near the end of life. The emergency department (ED) could serve as an important time and location for these conversations. To determine the feasibility of an ED-based, brief negotiated interview (BNI) to stimulate ACP conversations among seriously ill older adults. We conducted a pre/postintervention study in the ED of an urban, tertiary care, academic medical center. From November 2017 to May 2019, we prospectively enrolled adults ≥65 years of age with serious illness. Trained clinicians conducted the intervention. We measured patients' ACP engagement at baseline and follow-up (3 ± 1 weeks) and reviewed electronic medical record documentation of ACP (e.g., medical order for life-sustaining treatment [MOLST]). We enrolled 51 patients (mean age = 71; SD 12), 41% were female, and 51% of patients had metastatic cancer. Median duration of the intervention was 11.8 minutes; few (6%) of the interventions were interrupted. We completed follow-up for 61% of participants. Patients' self-reported ACP engagement increased from 3.0 to 3.7 out of 5 after the intervention ( < 0.01). Electronic documentation of health care proxy forms increased (75%-94%,  = 48) as did MOLST (0%-19%,  = 48) during the six months after the ED visit. A novel, ED-based, BNI intervention to stimulate ACP conversations for seriously ill older adults is feasible and may improve ACP engagement and documentation.

摘要

预先护理计划(ACP)谈话是一项重要干预措施,可在患者生命末期提供符合其目标的护理。急诊科(ED)可以成为进行这些谈话的重要时机和场所。为了确定基于急诊科的简短协商访谈(BNI)在重症老年患者中促进ACP谈话的可行性,我们在一家城市三级医疗学术医学中心的急诊科进行了一项干预前后研究。2017年11月至2019年5月,我们前瞻性纳入了年龄≥65岁的重症成年患者。经过培训的临床医生实施干预措施。我们在基线和随访时(3±1周)测量患者的ACP参与度,并查看ACP的电子病历记录(例如,维持生命治疗医嘱[MOLST])。我们纳入了51例患者(平均年龄=71岁;标准差12),41%为女性,51%的患者患有转移性癌症。干预的中位持续时间为11.8分钟;很少有干预(6%)被中断。我们对61%的参与者完成了随访。干预后,患者自我报告的ACP参与度从5分中的3.0分提高到了3.7分(P<0.01)。在急诊科就诊后的六个月内,医疗保健代理人表格的电子记录增加了(75%-94%,P=48),MOLST记录也增加了(0%-19%,P=48)。一种基于急诊科的新型BNI干预措施,用于促进重症老年患者的ACP谈话是可行的,并且可能会提高ACP参与度和记录。

相似文献

3
6
Feasibility of a Serious Illness Communication Program for Pediatric Advance Care Planning.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2424626. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24626.
7
Refinement of an Emergency Department-Based, Advance Care Planning Intervention for Nurses.
J Palliat Med. 2022 Apr;25(4):650-655. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0398. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
8
Locating Advance Care Planning Documents in the Electronic Health Record during Emergency Care.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 May;63(5):e489-e494. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
10
Advance Care Planning for Emergency Department Patients With COVID-19 Infection: An Assessment of a Physician Training Program.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Nov;39(11):1358-1363. doi: 10.1177/10499091211072850. Epub 2022 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

3
Instruments for Value Elucidation in Older Adults in Clinical Practice-A Scoping Review.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Apr;73(4):1267-1287. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19356. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
4
Advance Care Planning Initiatives in Critical Care Centers in Japan: A Case Report.
Clin Case Rep. 2025 Jan 7;13(1):e9703. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.9703. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial: Integrating the 'Time-limited Trial' in the emergency department.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 23;19(12):e0313858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313858. eCollection 2024.
8
Tools for tomorrow: a scoping review of patient-facing tools for advance care planning.
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Jun 24;18:26323524241263108. doi: 10.1177/26323524241263108. eCollection 2024.
9
Motivational interviews to enhance advance care plans in older adults: systematic review.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 19;14(e3):e2293-e2301. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004424.

本文引用的文献

1
Associations Among End-of-Life Discussions, Health-Care Utilization, and Costs in Persons With Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Oct;36(10):913-926. doi: 10.1177/1049909119848148. Epub 2019 May 9.
4
Empower Seriously Ill Older Adults to Formulate Their Goals for Medical Care in the Emergency Department.
J Palliat Med. 2019 Mar;22(3):267-273. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0360. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
5
6
Development and Pilot Testing of a Motivational Interview for Engagement in Advance Care Planning.
J Palliat Med. 2018 Jul;21(7):897-898. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0095.
7
Identifying the Population with Serious Illness: The "Denominator" Challenge.
J Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;21(S2):S7-S16. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0548. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
8
Outcomes That Define Successful Advance Care Planning: A Delphi Panel Consensus.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Feb;55(2):245-255.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.08.025. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验