Athanasopoulou Elpida, Karachalias Fotios, Yofoglu Lazaros, Kanatas Panagiotis, Danninger Kathrin, Weber Thomas, Blacher Jacques, Papaioannou Theodoros G, Manios Efstathios, Sfikakis Petros P, Argyris Antonios A, Protogerou Athanase D
Cardiovascular Prevention & Research Unit, Clinic/Laboratory of Pathophysiology, Laiko Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Cardiology Department, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria.
Hypertens Res. 2025 Mar;48(3):1099-1108. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-02061-3. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
The prevalence of systolic hypertension phenotypes based on simultaneous 24-h brachial (br) and aortic (ao) ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) remains unknown. We sought to describe their prevalence and associations with hypertension mediated organ damage (HMOD). Participants with 24-h br and ao ABPM, carotid ultrasound and echocardiography data were categorized into 4 systolic hypertension phenotypes: sustained systolic br and ao normotension (SSN), isolated br systolic hypertension (IbrSH), isolated ao systolic hypertension (IaoSH) and sustained br and ao systolic hypertension (SSH). Different calibrations for peripheral waveforms and cut-offs for 24-h ao systolic pressure were applied. Out of 1024 participants with ABPM, 684 had carotid and 423 echocardiography data. IaoSH ranged from 3.7% to 23.0% of the population, depending on the calibration and the applied cut-off; (SSN: 37.0-56.3%, IbrSH: 0.6-9.5%, SSH: 30.5-39.4%). In adjusted models including diastolic pressure, in comparison with SSN and IbrSH, IaoSH phenotype by 90 percentile of normalcy for calibration 2 (mean/diastolic pressure) had significantly higher carotid intimal-medial thickness, carotid cross-sectional area and left ventricular mass; the odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) of IaoSH for carotid hypertrophy and left ventricular hypertrophy was 2.57 (1.01-6.56) and 3.29 (1.13-9.55), respectively. Individuals with 24-h IaoSH and IbrSH constitute a non-neglectable percentage (around 10%) of the population. IaoSH cannot be detected by brachial ABPM due to the per se normal 24-h br systolic pressure and it is associated with increased HMOD, possibly leading to increased cardiovascular risk. Further outcome and mortality studies are needed to verify these results.
基于同步24小时肱动脉(br)和主动脉(ao)动态血压监测(ABPM)的收缩期高血压表型的患病率尚不清楚。我们试图描述它们的患病率以及与高血压介导的器官损害(HMOD)的关联。具有24小时br和ao ABPM、颈动脉超声和超声心动图数据的参与者被分为4种收缩期高血压表型:持续性收缩期br和ao血压正常(SSN)、孤立性br收缩期高血压(IbrSH)、孤立性ao收缩期高血压(IaoSH)和持续性br和ao收缩期高血压(SSH)。应用了外周波形的不同校准方法和24小时ao收缩压的截断值。在1024名进行ABPM的参与者中,684人有颈动脉数据,423人有超声心动图数据。根据校准方法和应用的截断值,IaoSH在人群中的比例为3.7%至23.0%;(SSN:37.0 - 56.3%,IbrSH:0.6 - 9.5%,SSH:30.5 - 39.4%)。在包括舒张压的校正模型中,与SSN和IbrSH相比,在校准2(平均/舒张压)的正常范围第90百分位数时的IaoSH表型具有显著更高的颈动脉内膜中层厚度、颈动脉横截面积和左心室质量;IaoSH发生颈动脉肥厚和左心室肥厚的优势比(95%置信区间)分别为2.57(1.01 - 6.56)和3.29(1.13 - 9.55)。24小时IaoSH和IbrSH个体在人群中占不可忽视的比例(约10%)。由于24小时br收缩压本身正常,IaoSH无法通过肱动脉ABPM检测到,并且它与HMOD增加相关,可能导致心血管风险增加。需要进一步的结局和死亡率研究来验证这些结果。