Zhang Tianruixue, Yan Ping, Huang Zhisheng, Liu Li, Zhou Yanhui, Xiao Yuqiao, Ma Guiyuan, Liu Zixuan, Xu Jia, Gu Can
Department of Nursing School of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Department of Health Care Research Center for Xinjiang Regional Population, Urumqi, China.
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Nov 15;11(12):100615. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100615. eCollection 2024 Dec.
This study aimed to explore how dyadic coping (DC) influences the psychological resilience (PR) levels of patients with cervical cancer (CC) and their spouses.
From April to June 2024, this cross-sectional study involved 177 dyads of patients with CC and their spouses from the gynecology and oncology wards of two tertiary hospitals in Xinjiang. Data were collected through questionnaires on demographic information, clinical characteristics, the Resilience Scale, and the Dyadic Coping Inventory, all of which were self-report measures. The results were thoroughly analyzed utilizing the Actor-Partner Interdependence Mediation Model.
The patients had a mean age of 49.94 ± 8.05 years (range: 26-64), with the majority being at stage II of CC. Their spouses had a mean age of 51.90 ± 8.02 years (range: 27-65). DC scores averaged 105.50 ± 23.98 for patients and 103.34 ± 22.26 for spouses, while PR scores were 63.51 ± 19.68 for patients and 67.44 ± 18.97 for spouses. Positive DC, which significantly correlated with higher levels of PR, was observed in patients with CC and their spouses ( = 0.285, < 0.01; = 0.697, < 0.01). Conversely, a negative DC was associated with a lower PR ( = -0.187, -0.390; < 0.01). Positive DC by patients with CC and their spouses equally improves both partners' PR. In contrast, negative DC by patients with CC and their spouses affects only their own PR.
Patients with CC and their spouses' PR is significantly influenced by both partners' DC behaviors. When both partners used positive coping strategies, their PR increased. Conversely, negative DC behaviors affected only patients' PR, possibly because of self-concealment and communication barriers, which may explain the lack of a reciprocal impact. Nurses should identify couples at risk for negative DC and implement resilience interventions to encourage both partners' engagement in positive coping.
本研究旨在探讨二元应对(DC)如何影响宫颈癌(CC)患者及其配偶的心理韧性(PR)水平。
2024年4月至6月,这项横断面研究纳入了新疆两家三级医院妇产科和肿瘤科病房的177对CC患者及其配偶。通过人口统计学信息问卷、临床特征问卷、心理韧性量表和二元应对量表收集数据,所有这些均为自陈式测量工具。利用行为者-伙伴相互依赖中介模型对结果进行了深入分析。
患者的平均年龄为49.94±8.05岁(范围:26 - 64岁),大多数处于CC二期。其配偶的平均年龄为51.90±8.02岁(范围:27 - 65岁)。患者的DC得分平均为105.50±23.98,配偶为103.34±22.26,而PR得分患者为63.51±19.68,配偶为67.44±18.97。在CC患者及其配偶中观察到积极的DC与较高水平的PR显著相关(r = 0.285,p < 0.01;r = 0.697,p < 0.01)。相反,消极的DC与较低的PR相关(r = -0.187,-0.390;p < 0.01)。CC患者及其配偶的积极DC同样提高了双方的PR。相比之下,CC患者及其配偶的消极DC仅影响他们自己的PR。
CC患者及其配偶的PR受到双方DC行为的显著影响。当双方都采用积极的应对策略时,他们的PR会增加。相反,消极的DC行为仅影响患者的PR,这可能是由于自我隐瞒和沟通障碍,这或许可以解释为何缺乏相互影响。护士应识别有消极DC风险的夫妻,并实施心理韧性干预措施,以鼓励双方参与积极应对。