• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术后的患者报告结局

Patient reported outcomes after laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis.

作者信息

Hougaard Emilie Schultz, Møller Lasse Kaalby, Kristensen Signe A Rønde, Høyer Mai Elizabeth, Ellebaek Mark Bremholm, Al-Najami Issam

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Research Unit of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Dec 24;410(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03584-6.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-024-03584-6
PMID:39718656
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to establish more evidence to provide the clinicians with a greater knowledge on the patient reported outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after laparoscopic appendectomy (LA).

METHOD

105 patients who had undergone LA for acute appendicitis regardless of severity, were included prospectively at Odense University Hospital, Svendborg. The patient reported consequence of surgery were assessed through the validated electronic survey from European-QoL questionnaire (5Q-5D-5L) including a self-reported VAS-score (0-100). The first survey was sent out the first day after surgery and the subsequent surveys at 7, 30 and 90 days. The replies was converted into an index-score expressing the QoL from 0 (death) to 1 (full health).

RESULTS

All patients experienced pain/discomfort at day 1. At day 7, 30 and 90 it was 95%, 45% and 25%, respectively. The median index-score at day 1, 7, 30 and 90 was 0.778, 0.840, 0.984 and 1.00, respectively.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是建立更多证据,以便为临床医生提供关于腹腔镜阑尾切除术后患者报告结局和生活质量(QoL)的更多知识。

方法

前瞻性纳入欧登塞大学医院斯文堡分院105例因急性阑尾炎接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术的患者,无论病情严重程度如何。通过经过验证的欧洲生活质量调查问卷(5Q-5D-5L)的电子调查评估患者报告的手术后果,包括自我报告的视觉模拟评分(0-100)。第一次调查在术后第一天发出,随后在第7、30和90天进行调查。回复被转换为一个指数评分,用以表示生活质量,范围从0(死亡)到1(完全健康)。

结果

所有患者在术后第1天均经历疼痛/不适。在第7、30和90天,经历疼痛/不适的患者比例分别为95%、45%和25%。在第1、7、30和90天的中位指数评分分别为0.778、0.840、0.984和1.00。

相似文献

1
Patient reported outcomes after laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术后的患者报告结局
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Dec 24;410(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03584-6.
2
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗疑似阑尾炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4.
3
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Open Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Comparative Study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的前瞻性对比研究
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2016;14(55):244-248.
4
Comparison of open and laparoscopic appendectomy in uncomplicated appendicitis: a prospective randomized clinical trial.单纯性阑尾炎开放手术与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013 May;19(3):200-4. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2013.58234.
5
Determination of risk factors for conversion from laparoscopic to open appendectomy in patients with acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎患者腹腔镜阑尾切除术转为开腹阑尾切除术的危险因素分析
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Oct;29(10):1103-1108. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.94955.
6
Laparoscopic Procedure is Not Independently Associated With the Development of Intra-Abdominal Abscess After Appendectomy: A Multicenter Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching Analysis.腹腔镜手术与阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿的发生无独立相关性:一项倾向评分匹配分析的多中心队列研究
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Oct;27(5):409-414. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000460.
7
Effectiveness of laparoscopic approach for acute appendicitis.腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效
Osaka City Med J. 2007 Jun;53(1):1-8.
8
Impact of previous abdominal surgery on laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis.既往腹部手术对急性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Apr;21(4):570-3. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9027-5. Epub 2006 Nov 14.
9
Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals.222 家 ACS NSQIP 医院中腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的结局比较。
Surgery. 2010 Oct;148(4):625-35; discussion 635-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.025. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
10
Risk factors for serious morbidity, prolonged length of stay and hospital readmission after laparoscopic appendectomy - results from Pol-LA (Polish Laparoscopic Appendectomy) multicenter large cohort study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术(Pol-LA)多中心大样本队列研究:术后严重并发症、住院时间延长和再次住院的风险因素。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 15;9(1):14793. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51172-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of laser acupuncture on gastrointestinal function recovery in patients after acute appendicitis surgery: A retrospective clinical study.激光针刺对急性阑尾炎手术后患者胃肠功能恢复的影响:一项回顾性临床研究。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jun 27;17(6):105897. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.105897.

本文引用的文献

1
Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis.阑尾切除术与抗生素治疗急性阑尾炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 29;4(4):CD015038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015038.pub2.
2
A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis comparing nonoperative versus operative management for uncomplicated appendicitis: a focus on randomized controlled trials.一项荟萃分析和试验序贯分析比较非手术与手术治疗单纯性阑尾炎的疗效:侧重于随机对照试验。
World J Emerg Surg. 2024 Jan 13;19(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00531-6.
3
Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus appendectomy or antibiotics in the modern approach to uncomplicated acute appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗与阑尾切除术或抗生素在单纯性急性阑尾炎的现代治疗中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2023 Dec;174(6):1292-1301. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.08.029. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
4
Varying negative appendectomy rates after laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术后不同的阴性阑尾切除率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 May 23;408(1):205. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02935-z.
5
The Danish EQ-5D-5L Value Set: A Hybrid Model Using cTTO and DCE Data.丹麦 EQ-5D-5L 值集:使用 cTTO 和 DCE 数据的混合模型。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jul;19(4):579-591. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00639-3. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
6
A Randomized Trial Comparing Antibiotics with Appendectomy for Appendicitis.抗生素与阑尾切除术治疗阑尾炎的随机对照试验。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 12;383(20):1907-1919. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2014320. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
7
Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction at 7-Year Follow-up of Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎 7 年随访的生活质量和患者满意度:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Apr 1;155(4):283-289. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.6028.
8
Patient Preferences for Surgery or Antibiotics for the Treatment of Acute Appendicitis.患者对急性阑尾炎手术治疗或抗生素治疗的偏好。
JAMA Surg. 2018 May 1;153(5):471-478. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.5310.
9
The Global Incidence of Appendicitis: A Systematic Review of Population-based Studies.全球阑尾炎发病率:基于人群的系统综述研究。
Ann Surg. 2017 Aug;266(2):237-241. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002188.
10
Meta-analysis of antibiotics versus appendicectomy for non-perforated acute appendicitis.非穿孔性急性阑尾炎抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2016 May;103(6):656-667. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10147. Epub 2016 Mar 17.