文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

将ChatGPT和生成式人工智能整合到临床研究中的策略。

Strategies for integrating ChatGPT and generative AI into clinical studies.

作者信息

Lee Jeong-Moo

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of HBP Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Blood Res. 2024 Dec 24;59(1):45. doi: 10.1007/s44313-024-00045-3.


DOI:10.1007/s44313-024-00045-3
PMID:39718704
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11668709/
Abstract

Large language models, specifically ChatGPT, are revolutionizing clinical research by improving content creation and providing specific useful features. These technologies can transform clinical research, including data collection, analysis, interpretation, and results sharing. However, integrating these technologies into the academic writing workflow poses significant challenges. In this review, I investigated the integration of large-language model-based AI tools into clinical research, focusing on practical implementation strategies and addressing the ethical considerations associated with their use. Additionally, I provide examples of the safe and sound use of generative AI in clinical research and emphasize the need to ensure that AI-generated outputs are reliable and valid in scholarly writing settings. In conclusion, large language models are a powerful tool for organizing and expressing ideas efficiently; however, they have limitations. Writing an academic paper requires critical analysis and intellectual input from the authors. Moreover, AI-generated text must be carefully reviewed to reflect the authors' insights. These AI tools significantly enhance the efficiency of repetitive research tasks, although challenges related to plagiarism detection and ethical use persist.

摘要

大型语言模型,特别是ChatGPT,正在通过改进内容创作和提供特定的有用功能来彻底改变临床研究。这些技术可以改变临床研究,包括数据收集、分析、解释和结果共享。然而,将这些技术整合到学术写作流程中带来了重大挑战。在这篇综述中,我研究了基于大型语言模型的人工智能工具在临床研究中的整合,重点关注实际实施策略,并解决与其使用相关的伦理考量。此外,我提供了在临床研究中安全合理使用生成式人工智能的示例,并强调需要确保人工智能生成的输出在学术写作环境中是可靠和有效的。总之,大型语言模型是一种有效组织和表达想法的强大工具;然而,它们也有局限性。撰写学术论文需要作者进行批判性分析和智力投入。此外,必须仔细审查人工智能生成的文本,以反映作者的见解。这些人工智能工具显著提高了重复性研究任务的效率,尽管与剽窃检测和道德使用相关的挑战仍然存在。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efab/11668709/b4b25ea3e7e4/44313_2024_45_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efab/11668709/f604e28a3c18/44313_2024_45_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efab/11668709/fb17ad02fb62/44313_2024_45_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efab/11668709/d60f70934aeb/44313_2024_45_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efab/11668709/1cb80ab21668/44313_2024_45_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efab/11668709/88dbff7830b0/44313_2024_45_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efab/11668709/4740c9ae92c3/44313_2024_45_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efab/11668709/703d08b9cc33/44313_2024_45_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efab/11668709/b4b25ea3e7e4/44313_2024_45_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efab/11668709/f604e28a3c18/44313_2024_45_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efab/11668709/fb17ad02fb62/44313_2024_45_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efab/11668709/d60f70934aeb/44313_2024_45_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efab/11668709/1cb80ab21668/44313_2024_45_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efab/11668709/88dbff7830b0/44313_2024_45_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efab/11668709/4740c9ae92c3/44313_2024_45_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efab/11668709/703d08b9cc33/44313_2024_45_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efab/11668709/b4b25ea3e7e4/44313_2024_45_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Strategies for integrating ChatGPT and generative AI into clinical studies.

Blood Res. 2024-12-24

[2]
A thorough examination of ChatGPT-3.5 potential applications in medical writing: A preliminary study.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024-10-4

[3]
Artificial intelligence-assisted academic writing: recommendations for ethical use.

Adv Simul (Lond). 2025-4-18

[4]
From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing.

Biol Sport. 2023-4

[5]
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Academic Surgery: Ethical Implications and Transformative Potential.

J Surg Res. 2025-3

[6]
ChatGPT: ethical concerns and challenges in academics and research.

J Infect Dev Ctries. 2023-9-30

[7]
The importance of transparency: Declaring the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in academic writing.

J Nurs Scholarsh. 2024-3

[8]
An overview of the capabilities of ChatGPT for medical writing and its implications for academic integrity.

Health Info Libr J. 2023-12

[9]
AI language models in human reproduction research: exploring ChatGPT's potential to assist academic writing.

Hum Reprod. 2023-12-4

[10]
Utilizing large language models for gastroenterology research: a conceptual framework.

Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025-4-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
Guidelines From the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience for Using Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Spine and Nerve Treatment.

J Pain Res. 2025-8-20

[2]
Correction: Strategies for integrating ChatGPT and generative AI into clinical studies.

Blood Res. 2025-1-21

本文引用的文献

[1]
REMOVED: Successful management of an Iatrogenic portal vein and hepatic artery injury in a 4-month-old female patient: A case report and literature review.

Radiol Case Rep. 2024-3-8

[2]
Publishers' and journals' instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: bibliometric analysis.

BMJ. 2024-1-31

[3]
A multi-center and non-interventional registry of brentuximab vedotin in patients with relapsed or refractory CD30-positive lymphoma: the CISL1803/BRAVO study.

Blood Res. 2023-12-31

[4]
GPTZero Performance in Identifying Artificial Intelligence-Generated Medical Texts: A Preliminary Study.

J Korean Med Sci. 2023-9-25

[5]
Guidance for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors on Use of AI, Language Models, and Chatbots.

JAMA. 2023-8-22

[6]
ChatGPT in medicine: an overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations.

Front Artif Intell. 2023-5-4

[7]
Benefits, Limits, and Risks of GPT-4 as an AI Chatbot for Medicine.

N Engl J Med. 2023-3-30

[8]
Can an artificial intelligence chatbot be the author of a scholarly article?

J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2023

[9]
Using AI to write scholarly publications.

Account Res. 2024-10

[10]
Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists.

Nature. 2023-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索