文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

人工智能聊天机器人可以成为学术文章的作者吗?

Can an artificial intelligence chatbot be the author of a scholarly article?

机构信息

Hanyang University School of Law, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2023;20:6. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.6. Epub 2023 Feb 27.


DOI:10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.6
PMID:36842449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10033224/
Abstract

At the end of 2022, the appearance of ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot with amazing writing ability, caused a great sensation in academia. The chatbot turned out to be very capable, but also capable of deception, and the news broke that several researchers had listed the chatbot (including its earlier version) as co-authors of their academic papers. In response, Nature and Science expressed their position that this chatbot cannot be listed as an author in the papers they publish. Since an AI chatbot is not a human being, in the current legal system, the text automatically generated by an AI chatbot cannot be a copyrighted work; thus, an AI chatbot cannot be an author of a copyrighted work. Current AI chatbots such as ChatGPT are much more advanced than search engines in that they produce original text, but they still remain at the level of a search engine in that they cannot take responsibility for their writing. For this reason, they also cannot be authors from the perspective of research ethics.

摘要

2022 年末,一款具有惊人写作能力的人工智能(AI)聊天机器人 ChatGPT 的出现,在学术界引起轩然大波。这款聊天机器人能力很强,但也很会骗人,有新闻爆出,几位研究人员已经将这款聊天机器人(包括其早期版本)列为他们学术论文的合著者。对此,《自然》和《科学》杂志表示,他们出版的论文中,这种聊天机器人不能列为作者。由于 AI 聊天机器人不是人类,在现行法律制度下,AI 聊天机器人自动生成的文本不能成为受版权保护的作品;因此,AI 聊天机器人不能成为受版权保护的作品的作者。目前的 AI 聊天机器人,如 ChatGPT,比搜索引擎先进得多,因为它们可以生成原创文本,但它们仍然停留在搜索引擎的水平,不能对自己的写作负责。因此,从研究伦理的角度来看,它们也不能成为作者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/591f/10033224/e4b4190ace58/jeehp-20-06f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/591f/10033224/e4b4190ace58/jeehp-20-06f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/591f/10033224/e4b4190ace58/jeehp-20-06f1.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Can an artificial intelligence chatbot be the author of a scholarly article?

J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2023

[2]
Application of artificial intelligence chatbots, including ChatGPT, in education, scholarly work, programming, and content generation and its prospects: a narrative review.

J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2023

[3]
Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: a friend or a foe?

Reprod Biomed Online. 2023-7

[4]
Implementation of Chatbot Technology in Health Care: Protocol for a Bibliometric Analysis.

JMIR Res Protoc. 2024-2-15

[5]
Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-8-31

[6]
Human vs machine: identifying ChatGPT-generated abstracts in Gynecology and Urogynecology.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024-8

[7]
Chatbots, generative AI, and scholarly manuscripts: WAME recommendations on chatbots and generative artificial intelligence in relation to scholarly publications.

Colomb Med (Cali). 2023

[8]
Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Behavior Change Model for Designing Artificial Intelligence Chatbots to Promote Physical Activity and a Healthy Diet: Viewpoint.

J Med Internet Res. 2020-9-30

[9]
Fake academic writing: ethics during chatbot era.

Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2023-6-1

[10]
Comparison of Medical Research Abstracts Written by Surgical Trainees and Senior Surgeons or Generated by Large Language Models.

JAMA Netw Open. 2024-8-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
Comparative performance of neurosurgery-specific, peer-reviewed versus general AI chatbots in bilingual board examinations: evaluating accuracy, consistency, and error minimization strategies.

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025-9-9

[2]
Identification and Categorization of the Top 100 Articles and the Future of Large Language Models: Thematic Analysis Using Bibliometric Analysis.

JMIR AI. 2025-8-27

[3]
How appropriately can generative artificial intelligence platforms, including GPT-4, Gemini, Bing, and Wrtn, answer questions about colon cancer in the Korean language?

Ann Coloproctol. 2025-6

[4]
Comparison of hand surgery certification exams in Europe and the United States using ChatGPT 4.0.

J Hand Microsurg. 2025-5-5

[5]
Chat GPT vs an experienced ophthalmologist: evaluating chatbot writing performance in ophthalmology.

Eye (Lond). 2025-4-1

[6]
The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts.

Res Ethics. 2023-10

[7]
Strategies for integrating ChatGPT and generative AI into clinical studies.

Blood Res. 2024-12-24

[8]
An integrative decision-making framework to guide policies on regulating ChatGPT usage.

PeerJ Comput Sci. 2024-2-29

[9]
Academic publisher guidelines on AI usage: A ChatGPT supported thematic analysis.

F1000Res. 2023

[10]
The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Writing Scientific Review Articles.

Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2024-2

本文引用的文献

[1]
ChatGPT is fun, but not an author.

Science. 2023-1-27

[2]
Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use.

Nature. 2023-1

[3]
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove.

Nature. 2023-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索