Suppr超能文献

阿片类药物联合用药与单一阿片类药物治疗成人癌痛的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案

Efficacy of opioid combination versus single opioid for adult cancer pain: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Maeng Chi Hoon, Hui David, Kang Ji-Yeon, Kim Soo Young, Kwon Jung Hye

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Palliative Care & Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 23;14(12):e084829. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084829.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Chronic pain is one of the most common and serious symptoms of cancer. Despite the limitations of dose titration using only one type of opioid, the effects of opioid combinations are poorly understood.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study will be conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions 6.3. We will search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Web of Science databases from their inception to June 2023. This review will consider all clinical trials involving patients aged ≥18 years who received opioids for chronic cancer pain. Two reviewers will independently screen and select relevant studies. The intervention will be a combination of opioids, including both strong and weak, to control cancer pain. The comparator will be set as a single opioid, with or without a placebo. For randomised controlled trials, version 2 of the Cochrane tool will be used to assess the risk of bias. For non-randomised studies, the risk of bias will be assessed using a tool for assessing the Risk of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I). The primary outcome will be pain response; if a quantitative synthesis is not appropriate, a synthesis without a meta-analysis will be undertaken. The quality of evidence for each primary outcome will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was not required for this systematic review and meta-analysis. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed (open-access) journal publications and conference presentations. Given the widespread use of opioid-based cancer pain management in clinical practice, this study is expected to generate significant interest among physicians, many of whom are likely to review and consider the findings in the context of their clinical decision-making.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42023427299.

摘要

引言

慢性疼痛是癌症最常见且最严重的症状之一。尽管仅使用一种阿片类药物进行剂量滴定存在局限性,但阿片类药物联合使用的效果却知之甚少。

方法与分析

本研究将按照《Cochrane系统评价干预措施手册》第6.3版进行。我们将检索Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、医学文献分析与联机检索系统(MEDLINE)、Embase、护理学与健康相关文献累积索引(CINAHL)以及科学网数据库,检索时间从各数据库建库至2023年6月。本综述将纳入所有涉及年龄≥18岁、接受阿片类药物治疗慢性癌痛患者的临床试验。两名评价员将独立筛选并选择相关研究。干预措施为阿片类药物联合使用,包括强效和弱效阿片类药物,用于控制癌痛。对照将设定为单一阿片类药物,有或无安慰剂。对于随机对照试验,将使用Cochrane工具第2版评估偏倚风险。对于非随机研究,将使用干预性非随机研究的偏倚风险评估工具(ROBINS-I)评估偏倚风险。主要结局将为疼痛反应;若不适合进行定量合成,则将进行无荟萃分析的合成。将使用推荐分级、评估、制定与评价指南评估每个主要结局的证据质量。

伦理与传播

本系统评价和荟萃分析无需伦理批准。研究结果将通过同行评审(开放获取)的期刊出版物和会议报告进行传播。鉴于基于阿片类药物的癌痛管理在临床实践中广泛应用,预计本研究将引起医生的极大兴趣,他们中的许多人可能会在临床决策过程中审视并考虑这些研究结果。

PROSPERO注册号:PROSPERO CRD42023427299。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验