Lee Chan Ning, Wafa Hatem A, Murphy George, Galloway James, Mahroo Omar A, Jackson Timothy L
Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
Ophthalmology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec 24;9(1):e001898. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001898.
Annual screening for hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) retinopathy is recommended, and electroretinography (ERG) is considered a gold-standard test, but there are screening shortfalls and standard ERG is burdensome and has limited availability. Newer, portable ERG devices using skin-based electrodes may increase screening capacity but need validation. This study aims to determine initial device accuracies and feasibility of further research.
Prospective diagnostic device accuracy and feasibility study comparing novel ERG devices to standard screening tests. Three groups of 35 participants on HCQ, categorised by HCQ retinopathy (definite, possible and no retinopathy), and 35 healthy control participants, recruited by consecutive sampling, will have full field and multifocal ERG index tests, delivered using skin-contact electrodes by two devices-RETEval full-field and UTAS multifocal ERG, both manufactured by LKC Technologies (Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA), compared with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and autofluorescence reference tests graded by two masked, independent retinal specialists. Eligible HCQ participants will either have diagnosed HCQ retinopathy or be eligible for screening per UK guidelines. Healthy control participants will have no prior HCQ exposure and be of similar age and sex to HCQ participants. Primary outcome is device-specific sensitivity and specificity. Secondary outcomes include the effect of dilation on device outputs, analysis of discriminatory waveforms, device acceptability and recruitment rate. Safety outcomes include adverse and serious adverse events and device events.
Cambridge East ethics committee gave a favourable opinion (24/EE/0011, 23/02/2024). Results will be published in a peer-reviewed ophthalmology journal.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06035887.
建议每年对羟氯喹(HCQ)视网膜病变进行筛查,视网膜电图(ERG)被视为金标准检测方法,但存在筛查不足的问题,且标准ERG操作繁琐,可用性有限。使用基于皮肤电极的新型便携式ERG设备可能会提高筛查能力,但需要验证。本研究旨在确定初始设备的准确性以及进一步研究的可行性。
一项前瞻性诊断设备准确性和可行性研究,将新型ERG设备与标准筛查测试进行比较。通过连续抽样招募三组共35名服用HCQ的参与者,根据HCQ视网膜病变情况(确诊、可能和无视网膜病变)进行分类,以及35名健康对照参与者,他们将接受全视野和多焦点ERG指标测试,由两种设备——RETEval全视野和UTAS多焦点ERG使用皮肤接触电极进行检测,这两种设备均由LKC Technologies(美国马里兰州盖瑟斯堡)制造,同时与由两名蒙面、独立的视网膜专家分级的光谱域光学相干断层扫描和自发荧光参考测试进行比较。符合条件的服用HCQ的参与者要么已被诊断为HCQ视网膜病变,要么根据英国指南符合筛查条件。健康对照参与者之前未接触过HCQ,年龄和性别与服用HCQ的参与者相似。主要结局是特定设备的敏感性和特异性。次要结局包括散瞳对设备输出的影响、鉴别波形分析、设备可接受性和招募率。安全性结局包括不良事件和严重不良事件以及设备事件。
剑桥东部伦理委员会给出了有利意见(24/EE/0011,2024年2月23日)。结果将发表在同行评审的眼科期刊上。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06035887