• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估医生和医学生循证医学能力的ACE工具日文版的有效性和可靠性:在线环境下的评估

Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the ACE tool for assessing evidence-based medicine competencies in medical practitioners and students: An evaluation in an online setting.

作者信息

Someko Hidehiro, Yamamoto Ryohei, Ariie Takashi, Onishi Akira, Kumasawa Junji, Okazawa Yuki, Hanaki Nao, Anan Keisuke, Matsuda Yuki, Fujiwara Gaku, Hashimoto Katsuhiko, Tada Masafumi, Akamatsu Yuri, Murakami Minoru, Fujii Kotaro, Kataoka Yuki

机构信息

Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/Public Health, Japan.

Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Japan.

出版信息

Intern Med. 2024 Dec 26. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4724-24.

DOI:10.2169/internalmedicine.4724-24
PMID:39721681
Abstract

Introduction Evidence-based medicine (EBM) competency is crucial for healthcare professionals; however, validated tools to assess EBM skills in Japanese are scarce. This study aimed to develop and validate a Japanese version of the Assessing Competency in EBM (ACE) tool. Methods We translated the ACE tool into Japanese, following international standards, and distributed it online to 99 healthcare professionals and students. The participants completed demographic questions and the Japanese version of the ACE tool. A subset also completed the retest and Fresno test. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and construct validity using a confirmatory factor analysis and correlation with the Fresno test. Results The Japanese version of the ACE tool showed a low internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.09-0.49), but an acceptable test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.40-0.81). A confirmatory factor analysis provided moderate support for the structure of the tool (SRMR = 0.092, RMSEA = 0.048, CFI = 0.852). The tool demonstrated a moderate correlation with the Fresno test (r = 0.35). The median completion time was 847 s (IQR, 577-1,249 s). Conclusion Although the Japanese version of the ACE tool showed some promising aspects, including a quick administration and partial validity, its low internal consistency suggests that refinement is needed before it can be confidently used in Japanese medical education settings. Future studies should focus on improving the tool's reliability, potentially through in-person administration, to develop a robust EBM assessment tool in the Japanese healthcare context.

摘要

引言 循证医学(EBM)能力对医疗保健专业人员至关重要;然而,在日本,用于评估循证医学技能的经过验证的工具却很稀缺。本研究旨在开发并验证日语版的循证医学能力评估(ACE)工具。方法 我们按照国际标准将ACE工具翻译成日语,并在线分发给99名医疗保健专业人员和学生。参与者完成了人口统计学问题以及日语版的ACE工具。一部分参与者还完成了重测和弗雷斯诺测试。使用克朗巴哈系数评估内部一致性,使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估重测信度,使用验证性因子分析以及与弗雷斯诺测试的相关性评估结构效度。结果 日语版的ACE工具显示出较低的内部一致性(克朗巴哈系数 = 0.31,95%置信区间:0.09 - 0.49),但重测信度尚可接受(ICC = 0.64,95%置信区间:0.40 - 0.81)。验证性因子分析为该工具的结构提供了适度支持(SRMR = 0.092,RMSEA = 0.048,CFI = 0.852)。该工具与弗雷斯诺测试显示出中等相关性(r = 0.35)。中位完成时间为847秒(四分位间距,577 - 1249秒)。结论 尽管日语版的ACE工具显示出一些有前景的方面,包括施测迅速和部分效度,但它较低的内部一致性表明在其能够自信地用于日本医学教育环境之前还需要改进。未来的研究应专注于提高该工具的可靠性,可能通过面对面施测,以在日本医疗保健背景下开发一个强大的循证医学评估工具。

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the ACE tool for assessing evidence-based medicine competencies in medical practitioners and students: An evaluation in an online setting.用于评估医生和医学生循证医学能力的ACE工具日文版的有效性和可靠性:在线环境下的评估
Intern Med. 2024 Dec 26. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4724-24.
2
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the digital addiction scale for children (DASC).儿童数字成瘾量表中文版(DASC)的改编与验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):2599. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23817-7.
4
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the autism spectrum knowledge scale.自闭症谱系知识量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度研究
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Jun 25;258:105204. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105204.
5
The Ultrashort Mental Health Screening Tool Is a Valid and Reliable Measure With Added Value to Support Decision-making.超短心理健康筛查工具具有有效性和可靠性,并且具有附加价值,可以支持决策。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):59-70. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002718. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
6
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Dynamic Evaluation of Motor Speech Skill (DEMSS-TR) Test for Children With Speech Sound Disorders.土耳其语版运动性言语技能动态评估(DEMSS-TR)测试对语音障碍儿童的有效性和可靠性
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70067. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70067.
7
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
8
Development and Validation of an Entrustable Professional Activity-Based Assessment Scale for Nurse Practitioners in Taiwan.台湾执业护士基于可托付专业活动的评估量表的开发与验证
J Nurs Res. 2025 Aug 1;33(4):e399. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000682.
9
The medical student stressor questionnaire (MSSQ): validation and reliability in Turkish students.医学生应激源问卷(MSSQ):土耳其学生中的效度与信度
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Aug 2;25(1):1141. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07689-4.
10
Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of the Mask Usability Scale: A Measure of the Perceived Usability of N95 Respirators Among Healthcare Students and Staff.口罩可用性量表的心理测量特性评估:一项针对医护专业学生和工作人员对N95口罩感知可用性的测量。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Aug;81(8):4613-4626. doi: 10.1111/jan.16590. Epub 2024 Nov 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the ACE tool for assessing competencies in evidence-based medicine in medical students.评估医学生循证医学能力的 ACE 工具西班牙语版的有效性和可靠性。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Apr;28(2):89-94. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2021-111888. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
2
Reliability and validity of the Persian version of the ACE tool: assessing medical trainees' competency in evidence-based medicine.ACE 工具波斯语版本的信度和效度:评估医学实习生在循证医学方面的能力。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jun 17;22(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03540-2.
3
Between-group minimally important change versus individual treatment responders.
组间最小重要变化与个体治疗反应者。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Oct;30(10):2765-2772. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02897-z. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
4
Development and validation of the ACE tool: assessing medical trainees' competency in evidence based medicine.ACE 工具的开发与验证:评估医学实习生循证医学能力。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Jun 9;14:114. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-114.
5
When to use agreement versus reliability measures.何时使用一致性测量与可靠性测量。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;59(10):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
6
Instruments for evaluating education in evidence-based practice: a systematic review.循证实践教育评估工具:一项系统综述。
JAMA. 2006 Sep 6;296(9):1116-27. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.9.1116.
7
Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM.使用组内相关系数和标准误来量化重测信度。
J Strength Cond Res. 2005 Feb;19(1):231-40. doi: 10.1519/15184.1.
8
Why we must teach evidence-based medicine.
Acad Med. 2005 Jan;80(1):1-2. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200501000-00001.
9
Validation of the Fresno test of competence in evidence based medicine.循证医学能力弗雷斯诺测试的验证
BMJ. 2003 Feb 8;326(7384):319-21. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7384.319.
10
Do short courses in evidence based medicine improve knowledge and skills? Validation of Berlin questionnaire and before and after study of courses in evidence based medicine.循证医学短期课程能提高知识和技能吗?柏林问卷的验证及循证医学课程的前后对照研究。
BMJ. 2002 Dec 7;325(7376):1338-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7376.1338.