Husum Yngvil Solheim, Moe Morten Carstens, Fagerland Morten Wang, Eriksen Erik Fink, Jørstad Øystein Kalsnes
Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec 25;9(1):e001964. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001964.
To assess the feasibility of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of zoledronic acid (ZA) as adjuvant therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
In this 1-year, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled pilot study, nAMD patients were allocated 1:1 to receive intravenous ZA 5 mg or placebo at baseline and after 6 months in addition to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy following a treat-and-extend regimen. Bevacizumab was the first-line anti-VEGF drug, but eyes with refractory nAMD were switched to aflibercept. The primary outcome was mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).
40 participants enrolled in the study, with 20 allocated to each treatment group. 38 participants received both study infusions, and all participants completed the final assessment. Mean (SD) change in BCVA was 7.5 (9.5) letters in the ZA group and -0.5 (11.5) letters in the control group; the between-group difference was 8.0 letters (95% CI: 1.5 to 15.0 letters). There were no between-group differences in mean change in central retinal thickness, refractory nAMD proportion or mean number of injections.
It is feasible to conduct a randomised controlled trial of ZA as adjuvant therapy for nAMD in terms of recruitment and adherence to the pilot study protocol. We found a possible visual benefit of ZA that is worth further investigation. To clarify the relationship between ZA and the need for intravitreal injections, we recommend amending the protocol by omitting switching of the anti-VEGF drug. Due to the limited sample size of the pilot study, the estimates of treatment effect are not meant to be confirmatory and should be interpreted with caution.
2019-001492-37 (EudraCT), 04304755 (NCT).
评估一项关于唑来膦酸(ZA)作为新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)辅助治疗的随机对照试验研究方案的可行性。
在这项为期1年的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的试点研究中,nAMD患者按1:1分配,在基线时和6个月后接受静脉注射5mg ZA或安慰剂,此外按照治疗并延长方案接受玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子(抗VEGF)治疗。贝伐单抗是一线抗VEGF药物,但难治性nAMD的眼睛改用阿柏西普。主要结局是最佳矫正视力(BCVA)的平均变化。
40名参与者纳入研究,每个治疗组分配20名。38名参与者接受了两次研究输注,所有参与者均完成了最终评估。ZA组BCVA的平均(标准差)变化为7.5(9.5)个字母,对照组为-0.5(11.5)个字母;组间差异为8.0个字母(95%可信区间:1.5至15.0个字母)。视网膜中央厚度的平均变化、难治性nAMD比例或平均注射次数在组间无差异。
就招募和遵循试点研究方案而言,开展ZA作为nAMD辅助治疗的随机对照试验是可行的。我们发现ZA可能对视功能有益,值得进一步研究。为阐明ZA与玻璃体内注射需求之间的关系,我们建议修改方案,省略抗VEGF药物的更换。由于试点研究样本量有限,治疗效果的估计并非确定性的,应谨慎解释。
2019-001492-37(欧盟临床试验注册号),04304755(美国国立医学图书馆临床试验注册编号)