Lek Dysoley, Shrestha Manash, Lhazeen Karma, Tobgyel Tobgyel, Kandel Shashi, Dahal Gokarna, Ghimire Yadu Chandra, Shrestha Bijaya, Ghimire Prakash, Hein Phone Si, Peto Thomas J, Callery James J, Tripura Rupam, von Seidlein Lorenz, Amaratunga Chanaki, Lynch Caroline A, Dondorp Arjen M, Adhikari Bipin
National Center for Parasitology, Entomology, and Malaria Control, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
School of Public Health, National Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Malar J. 2024 Dec 26;23(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-05215-3.
The national malaria control programmes in Cambodia, Nepal, and Bhutan aim to achieve malaria elimination by 2025-2030. While the vivax malaria burden remains challenging, the consistent decline in falciparum malaria in these countries over the last five years suggests that the goal is achievable. However, unexpected cases in previously falciparum malaria-free districts continue to occur. A virtual meeting was convened in May 2024, followed by smaller meetings, to discuss and share experiences among regional partners, focusing on falciparum malaria elimination.
The discussion among regional partners from these three countries was prompted by an isolated outbreak of falciparum malaria in April 2022 in a previously malaria-free district in Pursat province, Cambodia. The National Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control (CNM) worked with stakeholders to contain the outbreak, which was likely to have originated in forest goers. Community-based village malaria workers (VMWs) were augmented with the additional resources required to test and treat malaria among forest goers under the supervision of health centres and district hospitals. This response rapidly reduced malaria cases in the subsequent months. Regional partners from Nepal and Bhutan, who are also engaged in the final phase of malaria elimination, reported that isolated malaria outbreaks in their countries were not unusual and were mostly imported from a neighbouring country, India. Importation of cases was facilitated by unsupervised transborder travel including the movement of migrant workers. The imported cases were only established during the case investigation such as when responding to the isolated outbreaks. In contrast, in Cambodia, spread of malaria was known to be facilitated by mobile and migrant workers, and forest goers within the country. The specific differences between Nepal and Bhutan (South Asia), and Cambodia (Greater Mekong Subregion) offered insights into strategies for malaria elimination. A relevant component for countries embarking on malaria elimination included strengthening of local malaria surveillance and response in collaboration with the community health workers, and community members targeting the 'at risk' population.
In countries approaching malaria elimination, resourcing community-based health workers could play a critical role in enhancing malaria surveillance, early case detection and treatment, including interventions targeting migrant populations such as forest goers and seasonal migrant workers.
柬埔寨、尼泊尔和不丹的国家疟疾控制规划旨在到2025年至2030年实现疟疾消除。虽然间日疟的负担仍然具有挑战性,但过去五年中这些国家恶性疟的持续下降表明该目标是可以实现的。然而,在以前没有恶性疟的地区仍不断出现意外病例。2024年5月召开了一次虚拟会议,随后又召开了一些小型会议,以讨论并在区域伙伴间分享经验,重点是消除恶性疟。
2022年4月,柬埔寨菩萨省一个以前没有疟疾的地区爆发了一起孤立的恶性疟疫情,促使这三个国家的区域伙伴展开了讨论。国家寄生虫学、昆虫学和疟疾控制中心(CNM)与利益相关者合作控制疫情,疫情可能源于进入森林的人。在卫生中心和地区医院的监督下,为以社区为基础的乡村疟疾防治员(VMW)增加了所需的额外资源,以便对进入森林的人进行疟疾检测和治疗。这一应对措施在随后几个月迅速减少了疟疾病例。同样处于疟疾消除最后阶段的尼泊尔和不丹的区域伙伴报告称,他们国家孤立的疟疾疫情并不罕见,大多是从邻国印度输入的。包括移民工人流动在内的无监督跨境旅行助长了病例的输入。输入病例仅在病例调查期间(如应对孤立疫情时)才得以确认。相比之下,在柬埔寨,已知疟疾的传播是由流动和移民工人以及该国境内进入森林的人促成的。尼泊尔和不丹(南亚)与柬埔寨(大湄公河次区域)之间的具体差异为疟疾消除策略提供了见解。对于开始消除疟疾的国家而言,一个相关组成部分包括与社区卫生工作者及以“高危”人群为目标的社区成员合作,加强当地疟疾监测和应对。
在接近疟疾消除的国家,为以社区为基础的卫生工作者提供资源在加强疟疾监测、早期病例检测和治疗方面可能发挥关键作用,包括针对进入森林的人和季节性移民工人等流动人口的干预措施。