Suppr超能文献

日本调查委员会C型股骨头坏死中X线摄影与磁共振成像的差异

Discrepancy between radiography and magnetic resonance imaging in Japanese Investigation Committee classification type C osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

作者信息

Otaka Keiji, Osawa Yusuke, Takegami Yasuhiko, Funahashi Hiroto, Imagama Shiro

机构信息

Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2025 Feb;49(2):391-397. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06396-x. Epub 2024 Dec 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) classification for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is based on the necrotic area relative to the weight-bearing surface on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs or central coronal MRI. Discrepancies exist between these methods, potentially related to the AP necrosis area. This study evaluated these discrepancies and the extent of AP necrotic lesions.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 139 patients (188 hips) with nontraumatic ONFH, JIC type C1 or C2 on radiography, and collapse < 3 mm. Cases with and without discrepancies between radiography and MRI were designated as discrepancy and consistent groups, respectively. We assessed the proportion of patients in the discrepancy group and survival rates in both groups, with femoral head collapse > 3 mm as the endpoint. The cutoff value for AP necrotic regions on lateral radiographs identifying discrepancies was calculated using ROC curve analysis.

RESULTS

The discrepancy group comprised 28 hips (14.9%) vs. 160 hips in the consistent group. Five-year survival rates were 73.3% vs. 31.9% (P < 0.01), and AP necrotic region extent was 61.2 vs. 73.8 mm (P < 0.001) in discrepancy vs. consistent groups. The cutoff value for necrotic region extent revealing discrepancies was 66.9% (AUC 0.833, sensitivity 83.8%, specificity 82.4%).

CONCLUSION

Patients with AP necrotic regions < 66.9% were more likely to show discrepancies between radiography and MRI in type classification. This study can help improve accuracy in assessing ONFH severity and prognosis.

摘要

目的

日本调查委员会(JIC)对股骨头坏死(ONFH)的分类是基于前后位(AP)X线片或中心冠状面MRI上坏死区域相对于负重面的情况。这些方法之间存在差异,可能与AP坏死区域有关。本研究评估了这些差异以及AP坏死病变的范围。

方法

我们回顾性分析了139例非创伤性ONFH患者(188髋),其X线片显示为JIC C1或C2型,且塌陷<3 mm。将X线片和MRI之间有差异和无差异的病例分别指定为差异组和一致组。我们以股骨头塌陷>3 mm为终点,评估差异组患者的比例以及两组的生存率。使用ROC曲线分析计算侧位X线片上识别差异的AP坏死区域的截断值。

结果

差异组有28髋(14.9%),而一致组有160髋。差异组和一致组的五年生存率分别为73.3%和31.9%(P<0.01),AP坏死区域范围分别为61.2和73.8 mm(P<0.001)。显示差异的坏死区域范围的截断值为66.9%(AUC 0.833,敏感性83.8%,特异性82.4%)。

结论

AP坏死区域<66.9%的患者在类型分类中更有可能在X线片和MRI之间出现差异。本研究有助于提高评估ONFH严重程度和预后的准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b794/11762415/7f6fb7a8acda/264_2024_6396_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验