Gazer Ahmed M, Hammad Elsayed
Alexandria University, Alexandria faculty of Medicine, Champollion street, Alexandria, Egypt.
Clin Cardiol. 2025 Jan;48(1):e70072. doi: 10.1002/clc.70072.
We recently reviewed the article titled "Outcomes of Bolus Dose Furosemide Versus Continuous Infusion in Patients With Acute Decompensated Left Ventricular Failure and Atrial Fibrillation" published in Clinical Cardiology by [khan et al.] (1) with great interest. This study addresses a crucial area of clinical practice, and we appreciate the authors' efforts in exploring this topic. However, during our review, we observed points that require clarification to better understand the presented finding: Patient Numbers in Table 1 In the study paper: The reported patient population underwent a sudden and significant reduction. This discrepancy was not sufficiently explained in the study.
我们最近饶有兴趣地审阅了发表于《临床心脏病学》杂志上由[汗等人](1)撰写的题为“急性失代偿性左心室衰竭合并心房颤动患者静脉推注呋塞米与持续静脉输注的疗效比较”的文章。这项研究涉及临床实践中的一个关键领域,我们赞赏作者在探索该主题方面所做的努力。然而,在审阅过程中,我们发现了一些需要澄清的问题,以便更好地理解所呈现的研究结果:表1中的患者数量 在研究论文中:报告的患者群体突然大幅减少。该研究对此差异未作充分解释。