• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2020 - 2022年科罗拉多州县一级总统选举结果与新冠病毒死亡率的关联

The Association of County-Level Presidential Election Outcome and COVID-19 Mortality in Colorado, 2020-2022.

作者信息

DeBie Kelly A, Gutilla Margaret J, Keller Kayleigh P, Peel Jennifer L, Rojas-Rueda David, Neophytou Andreas M

机构信息

Author Affiliations: Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences (Drs DeBie, Peel, Rojas-Rueda, and Neophytou), Colorado School of Public Health (Drs Gutilla, Keller, Peel, Rojas-Rueda, and Neophytou), Department of Health and Exercise Science (Dr Gutilla), and Department of Statistics (Dr Keller), Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.

Department of Health and Exercise Science (Dr Gutilla), and Department of Statistics & Colorado School of Public Health (Dr Keller), Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.

出版信息

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2025;31(3):E179-E186. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000002098. Epub 2024 Dec 26.

DOI:10.1097/PHH.0000000000002098
PMID:39724050
Abstract

CONTEXT

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic occurred during a time of political tension in the United States. County-level political environment may have been influential in COVID-19 outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the association between county-level political environment and age-adjusted COVID-19 mortality rates from 2020 to 2022.

DESIGN SETTING

Political environment was measured by the 2020 Presidential election results and compared with age-adjusted COVID-19 mortality rates by county in Colorado.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using negative binomial regression incorporating a population offset term. Models adjusted for populational differences using the demographics percentile from Colorado's EnviroScreen Environmental Justice Tool.

RESULTS

Age-adjusted county mortality rates ranged from 14.3 to 446.8.0 per 100 000. 2021 COVID-19 mortality rates were nearly twice as high in counties voting for Donald Trump compared to those voting for Joseph Biden (adjusted RR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.59, 2.47). Results for 2020 and 2022 mortality models were also in the positive direction, though the confidence intervals crossed null values.

CONCLUSION

These results build on a growing body of evidence that political environment may have been influential for COVID-19 mortality, helping to understand the drivers of health outcomes. Implications for the public health system as we shift into the endemic period of COVID-19 include motivation for collaborative work to restore and rebuild trust among and between stakeholders and the community, as well as increase health education given its' influence on both individual and community behaviors.

摘要

背景

2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行发生在美国政治紧张时期。县级政治环境可能对COVID-19的结果产生影响。

目的

本研究调查了2020年至2022年县级政治环境与年龄调整后的COVID-19死亡率之间的关联。

设计背景

政治环境通过2020年总统选举结果来衡量,并与科罗拉多州各县年龄调整后的COVID-19死亡率进行比较。

主要结局指标

使用纳入人口偏移项的负二项回归估计率比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。模型使用科罗拉多州环境筛查环境正义工具中的人口统计学百分位数对人口差异进行了调整。

结果

年龄调整后的县死亡率为每10万人14.3至446.8。2021年,投票给唐纳德·特朗普的县的COVID-19死亡率几乎是投票给约瑟夫·拜登的县的两倍(调整后的RR = 1.98,95% CI:1.59,2.47)。2020年和2022年死亡率模型的结果也呈正向,尽管置信区间跨越了零值。

结论

这些结果建立在越来越多的证据基础上,即政治环境可能对COVID-19死亡率产生影响,有助于理解健康结果的驱动因素。随着我们进入COVID-19的流行期,对公共卫生系统的影响包括推动开展合作工作,以恢复和重建利益相关者与社区之间的信任,以及鉴于其对个人和社区行为的影响而加强健康教育。

相似文献

1
The Association of County-Level Presidential Election Outcome and COVID-19 Mortality in Colorado, 2020-2022.2020 - 2022年科罗拉多州县一级总统选举结果与新冠病毒死亡率的关联
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2025;31(3):E179-E186. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000002098. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
2
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.
3
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.物理干预措施以阻断或减少呼吸道病毒的传播。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 30;1(1):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6.
4
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.抗体检测用于鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 的现症感染和既往感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2.
5
SARS-CoV-2-neutralising monoclonal antibodies for treatment of COVID-19.用于治疗 COVID-19 的 SARS-CoV-2 中和单克隆抗体。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 2;9(9):CD013825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013825.pub2.
6
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
7
Geosocial Media's Early Warning Capabilities Across US County-Level Political Clusters: Observational Study.地理社交网络在美国县级政治集群中的早期预警能力:观察性研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Jan 30;5:e58539. doi: 10.2196/58539.
8
Effects of city design on transport mode choice and exposure to health risks during and after a crisis: a retrospective observational analysis.危机期间及之后城市设计对交通方式选择和健康风险暴露的影响:一项回顾性观察分析
Lancet Planet Health. 2025 Jun;9(6):e467-e479. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(25)00088-9.
9
Workplace interventions to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection outside of healthcare settings.工作场所干预措施以降低医疗机构外 SARS-CoV-2 感染的风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 6;5(5):CD015112. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015112.pub2.
10
Risk of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 who are using hormonal contraception.COVID-19 患者使用激素避孕的血栓栓塞风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 9;1(1):CD014908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014908.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Political Determinants of Health: Has COVID-19 Exposed the Worst of It?健康的政治决定因素:新冠疫情是否暴露了其中最糟糕的一面?
Am J Public Health. 2024 Sep;114(9):879-881. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307778. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
2
Politicization and Polarization in COVID-19 News Coverage.新冠疫情新闻报道中的政治化与两极分化。
Sci Commun. 2020 Oct;42(5):679-697. doi: 10.1177/1075547020950735.
3
Impact of Political Leaning on COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Network-Based Multiple Mediation Analysis.政治倾向对新冠疫苗犹豫态度的影响:基于网络的多重中介分析
Cureus. 2023 Aug 9;15(8):e43232. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43232. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Integrating The US Public Health And Medical Care Systems To Improve Health Crisis Response.整合美国公共卫生和医疗保健系统,以改善卫生危机应对。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Mar;42(3):310-317. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01255.
5
Trust In US Federal, State, And Local Public Health Agencies During COVID-19: Responses And Policy Implications.在 COVID-19 期间信任美国联邦、州和地方公共卫生机构:回应和政策意义。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Mar;42(3):328-337. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01204.
6
Excess mortality and the COVID-19 pandemic: causes of death and social inequalities.超额死亡率与 COVID-19 大流行:死亡原因与社会不平等。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 7;22(1):2293. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14785-3.
7
Excess Mortality Versus COVID-19 Death Rates: A Spatial Analysis of Socioeconomic Disparities and Political Allegiance Across U.S. States.超额死亡率与新冠肺炎死亡率:美国各州社会经济差距与政治忠诚度的空间分析
Rev Income Wealth. 2022 Jun;68(2):348-392. doi: 10.1111/roiw.12570. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
8
The Trump Administration and the COVID-19 crisis: Exploring the warning-response problems and missed opportunities of a public health emergency.特朗普政府与新冠疫情危机:探究公共卫生紧急事件中的预警应对问题及错失的机遇
Public Adm. 2022 Mar 29. doi: 10.1111/padm.12843.
9
Identifying the Socioeconomic, Demographic, and Political Determinants of Social Mobility and Their Effects on COVID-19 Cases and Deaths: Evidence From US Counties.确定社会流动的社会经济、人口和政治决定因素及其对新冠疫情病例和死亡的影响:来自美国各县的证据。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Mar 3;2(1):e31813. doi: 10.2196/31813. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.
10
County-level vaccination coverage and rates of COVID-19 cases and deaths in the United States: An ecological analysis.美国县级新冠疫苗接种覆盖率以及新冠病例和死亡发生率:一项生态分析。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 May;9:100191. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100191. Epub 2022 Jan 31.