Sologova Diana, Diachkova Ekaterina, Sologova Susanna, Smolyarchuk Elena, Margaryan Arus, Grigorevskikh Ekaterina, Petruk Pavel, Tumanova Elizaveta, Svitich Oxana, Tarasenko Svetlana
Department of Oral Surgery of the Institute of Dentistry, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119048 Moscow, Russia.
Department of Pharmacology, Nelyubin Institute of Pharmacy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Nov 27;12(12):388. doi: 10.3390/dj12120388.
: Impacted third molar extraction with a scalpel and rotary instruments is one of the most traumatic surgeries in dentistry. Therefore, it is necessary to discover less traumatic methods and instruments to reduce the risk of postoperative complications. : This study is reported in accordance with the CONSORT guidelines. The study aim is to assess the effectiveness of an Er:YAG laser with a wavelength of 2.94 μm, cutting and rotating instruments in the extraction of lower third molars in comparison with the traditional instruments using clinical and radiology parameters. In the control group, the impacted third molars were extracted with the traditional instruments, like scalpel and rotary instruments; in the test group, the impacted third molars were extracted with an Er:YAG laser. As per the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we enrolled 60 patients who were randomly assigned into two groups (Er:YAG laser group and control group). The efficacy of the Er:YAG laser was assessed by postoperative pain, collateral swelling, mouth opening, and radiology parameters such as radiographic infrabony defects and radiographic bone height after tooth extraction. : The results showed that the clinical postoperative parameters like pain, collateral swelling, and mouth opening were less pronounced in the Er:YAG laser group than those in the control group ( < 0.001). According to the data of the radiology parameters (RBH and RID), the regeneration of the socket after extraction was better in the laser group than in the control group ( < 0.001). : Based on the obtained results of clinical and radiology parameters assessment, it was shown that third molar extraction using an Er:YAG laser is a less traumatic method than extraction using a scalpel and rotary instruments.
使用手术刀和旋转器械拔除阻生第三磨牙是牙科中创伤最大的手术之一。因此,有必要探索创伤较小的方法和器械,以降低术后并发症的风险。
本研究按照CONSORT指南报告。研究目的是评估波长为2.94μm的铒激光、切割和旋转器械与传统器械相比,在拔除下颌第三磨牙时的有效性,评估指标包括临床和放射学参数。在对照组中,使用手术刀和旋转器械等传统器械拔除阻生第三磨牙;在试验组中,使用铒激光拔除阻生第三磨牙。根据纳入和排除标准,我们招募了60例患者,随机分为两组(铒激光组和对照组)。通过术后疼痛、侧方肿胀、张口度以及放射学参数,如拔牙后影像学骨下袋缺损和影像学骨高度,来评估铒激光的疗效。
结果显示,铒激光组的术后疼痛、侧方肿胀和张口度等临床参数比对照组轻(<0.001)。根据放射学参数(RBH和RID)的数据,激光组拔牙后牙槽窝的再生情况比对照组好(<0.001)。
基于临床和放射学参数评估的结果表明,与使用手术刀和旋转器械拔牙相比,使用铒激光拔除第三磨牙是一种创伤较小的方法。