Lambertini Carlotta, Boanini Elena, Casalini Isabelle, Spaccini Francesca, Rinnovati Riccardo, Romagnoli Noemi
Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Vet Sci. 2024 Nov 30;11(12):612. doi: 10.3390/vetsci11120612.
The aim of this retrospective clinical study was to compare the combinations of ketamine/diazepam (KD group) and tiletamine/zolazepam (TZ group) for the induction of general anaesthesia in horses undergoing elective surgery. The data from the clinical and the anaesthetic records of 138 horses from 2021 to 2023 were evaluated, and the horses were divided in two groups: KD ( = 60) and TZ ( = 72). The horses were premedicated with romifidine and methadone IV; anaesthesia was induced with ketamine/diazepam for the KD group and tiletamine/zolazepam for the TZ group and was maintained with isoflurane and a constant rate infusion of romifidine. The data encompassed sex and neuter status, age, breed, weight, American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status, type of surgical procedure performed under anaesthesia, induction time, induction score, surgery time, recovery time, and the recovery score using a descriptive scale. Baseline heart rate (HR), intraoperative HR, baseline respiratory rate (R), intraoperative R, mean arterial pressure (MAP), oxygen saturation (SpO), and fraction of expired isoflurane (F'Iso) were also recorded. The induction time was significantly longer ( = 0.004) in the TZ group (60 (40-120)) as compared to the KD group (50 (30-120)). Recovery time was also significantly longer ( ≤ 0.001) in the TZ group (46.5 (15-125)) as compared to the KD group (30 (5-105)). These findings suggested that, in adult horses undergoing elective surgery, TZ could be considered a valid alternative to KD for the induction of general anaesthesia. Additional experimental studies comparing the two induction regimens and their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics are needed.
本回顾性临床研究的目的是比较氯胺酮/地西泮组合(KD组)和替来他明/唑拉西泮组合(TZ组)用于择期手术马匹全身麻醉诱导的效果。评估了2021年至2023年138匹马的临床和麻醉记录数据,这些马匹被分为两组:KD组(n = 60)和TZ组(n = 72)。马匹术前静脉注射罗米芬定和美沙酮;KD组用氯胺酮/地西泮诱导麻醉,TZ组用替来他明/唑拉西泮诱导麻醉,并用异氟烷维持麻醉,并持续静脉输注罗米芬定。数据包括性别、去势状态、年龄、品种、体重、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况、麻醉下进行的手术类型、诱导时间、诱导评分、手术时间、恢复时间以及使用描述性量表的恢复评分。还记录了基础心率(HR)、术中HR、基础呼吸频率(R)、术中R、平均动脉压(MAP)、血氧饱和度(SpO)和呼出异氟烷分数(F'Iso)。与KD组(50(30 - 120))相比,TZ组(60(40 - 120))的诱导时间显著更长(P = 0.004)。与KD组(30(5 - 105))相比,TZ组(46.5(15 - 125))的恢复时间也显著更长(P≤0.001)。这些发现表明,在接受择期手术的成年马匹中,TZ可被视为KD用于全身麻醉诱导的有效替代方案。需要进行额外的实验研究来比较这两种诱导方案及其药代动力学和药效学特征。