Suppr超能文献

伯利兹玛雅黄金景观中小农户采用可可农林业及预防森林损失

Cacao agroforestry adoption by smallholder farmers and forest loss prevention in the Maya Golden Landscape, Belize.

作者信息

Chicas Santos Daniel, Mizoue Nobuya, Ota Tetsuji, Kyaw Khin Thu Wint, Valdez Miguel Conrado, Nielsen Jonas Østergaard, Chen Chi-Farn

机构信息

Department of Agro-Environmental Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.

Center for Space and Remote Sensing Research, Zhongli District, National Central University, Taoyuan City, 32001, Taiwan.

出版信息

Ambio. 2025 May;54(5):882-898. doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-02106-4. Epub 2024 Dec 27.

Abstract

Unsustainable land use practices have led to increased forest loss rates. Implementing cacao agroforestry can reduce forest loss by preventing the clear-cutting of forests for monoculture plantations. However, research is needed on its effectiveness in preventing forest loss and the factors influencing its adoption between full-time and part-time farmers. Here, we address these gaps in the Maya Golden Landscape, Belize, by using Mahalanobis distance matching to compare forest loss in cacao agroforestry concession, forest reserve, and de-reserve areas and analyzing social data of 187 households. The results suggest that the odds of forest loss in the cacao agroforestry concession area are approximately 16% higher than in the Maya Mountain North Forest Reserve. In comparison, they are 85% lower than in the de-reserved areas. We also report differences in the factors influencing agroforestry adoption between part-time and full-time farmers. Successful cacao agroforestry adoption requires considering the differences that exist between farmers' categories.

摘要

不可持续的土地利用方式导致森林损失率上升。实施可可农林复合经营可以通过防止为单一作物种植园而砍伐森林来减少森林损失。然而,需要对其在防止森林损失方面的有效性以及影响全职和兼职农民采用该经营方式的因素进行研究。在此,我们通过使用马氏距离匹配法来比较可可农林复合经营特许权区域、森林保护区和非保护区的森林损失情况,并分析187户家庭的社会数据,以填补伯利兹玛雅黄金景观地区的这些空白。结果表明,可可农林复合经营特许权区域的森林损失几率比玛雅山北部森林保护区高出约16%。相比之下,比非保护区低85%。我们还报告了兼职和全职农民在影响采用农林复合经营方式的因素方面存在的差异。成功采用可可农林复合经营需要考虑不同农民类别之间存在的差异。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

7
Classifying drivers of global forest loss.全球森林损失的驱动因素分类。
Science. 2018 Sep 14;361(6407):1108-1111. doi: 10.1126/science.aau3445.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验