• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越个人责任化:痴呆自我检测应用程序传播中社会关系的动员方式

Beyond Individual Responsibilisation: How Social Relations are Mobilised in Communication About a Dementia Self-Testing App.

作者信息

Kapeller Alexandra

机构信息

Department for Thematic Studies: Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, Hus T, Campus Valla, Linköping, 58183, Sweden.

出版信息

Health Care Anal. 2024 Dec 27. doi: 10.1007/s10728-024-00498-8.

DOI:10.1007/s10728-024-00498-8
PMID:39729287
Abstract

Research on mobile health (mHealth) applications has investigated how such technologies contribute to a responsibilisation of users/patients. This literature largely focuses on the individual responsibilities constructed by the apps and the neoliberal environments that enable the positioning of the user as responsible. With this focus, this scholarship is less attentive to the role of social relations in responsibilisation. In this article, I demonstrate how relational responsibilities are constructed in the communication of a North American self-testing app for "early changes in cognition". Through an analysis of qualitative expert interviews and images on the app's web presence, I show how social relations are, in fact, mobilised in the construction of the responsibilities to support the user in the test situation, to take the test for the sake of others, and to make others take the test. Based on this analysis, I argue that the role of social relations should receive more attention in the literature on responsibilisation, because they lead to additional, sometimes gendered responsibilities that a focus on individual responsibilities would miss.

摘要

移动健康(mHealth)应用程序的研究探讨了此类技术如何促使用户/患者承担责任。该文献主要关注应用程序构建的个人责任以及使将用户定位为责任人成为可能的新自由主义环境。基于此关注点,该学术研究较少关注社会关系在责任承担中的作用。在本文中,我展示了在一款针对“认知早期变化”的北美自测应用程序的交流中,关系责任是如何构建的。通过对定性专家访谈以及该应用程序网络展示中的图像进行分析,我展示了社会关系实际上是如何在责任构建中被调动起来的,以在测试情境中支持用户、为他人进行测试以及促使他人进行测试。基于这一分析,我认为社会关系的作用在关于责任承担的文献中应得到更多关注,因为它们会导致额外的、有时带有性别差异的责任,而专注于个人责任会忽略这些责任。

相似文献

1
Beyond Individual Responsibilisation: How Social Relations are Mobilised in Communication About a Dementia Self-Testing App.超越个人责任化:痴呆自我检测应用程序传播中社会关系的动员方式
Health Care Anal. 2024 Dec 27. doi: 10.1007/s10728-024-00498-8.
2
Usability and User Experience of an mHealth App for Therapy Support of Patients With Breast Cancer: Mixed Methods Study Using Eye Tracking.移动医疗应用程序在乳腺癌患者治疗支持中的可用性和用户体验:使用眼动追踪的混合方法研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Mar 5;11:e50926. doi: 10.2196/50926.
3
Designing and Developing a Mobile App for Management and Treatment of Gestational Diabetes in Nepal: User-Centered Design Study.为尼泊尔妊娠期糖尿病管理与治疗设计和开发一款移动应用程序:以用户为中心的设计研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jan 17;8:e50823. doi: 10.2196/50823.
4
A User-Centered Design Approach for a Screening App for People With Cognitive Impairment (digiDEM-SCREEN): Development and Usability Study.一种针对认知障碍患者的筛查应用程序(digiDEM-SCREEN)的以用户为中心的设计方法:开发与可用性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jan 22;12:e65022. doi: 10.2196/65022.
5
Phenomenology and empowerment in self-testing apps.自我检测应用中的现象学与赋权。
Bioethics. 2024 Nov;38(9):770-777. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13293. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
6
Attributes, Quality, and Downloads of Dementia-Related Mobile Apps for Patients With Dementia and Their Caregivers: App Review and Evaluation Study.针对痴呆症患者及其护理人员的痴呆症相关移动应用程序的属性、质量和下载量:应用程序审查与评估研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Apr 29;8:e51076. doi: 10.2196/51076.
7
Mobile Apps for Common Noncommunicable Disease Management: Systematic Search in App Stores and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale.移动应用程序用于常见非传染性疾病管理:在应用商店中的系统搜索和使用移动应用程序评级量表进行评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 12;12:e49055. doi: 10.2196/49055.
8
Factors Influencing Adherence to mHealth Apps for Prevention or Management of Noncommunicable Diseases: Systematic Review.影响移动医疗应用程序用于预防或管理非传染性疾病的依从性的因素:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 25;24(5):e35371. doi: 10.2196/35371.
9
The Dutch COVID-19 Notification App: Lessons Learned From a Mixed Methods Evaluation Among End Users and Contact-Tracing Employees.荷兰新冠疫情通知应用程序:终端用户和接触者追踪工作人员混合方法评估的经验教训
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Nov 4;6(11):e38904. doi: 10.2196/38904.
10
The 4 Youth By Youth mHealth Photo Verification App for HIV Self-testing in Nigeria: Qualitative Analysis of User Experiences.尼日利亚用于艾滋病毒自我检测的“4青年由青年移动健康照片验证应用程序”:用户体验的定性分析。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Nov 17;5(11):e25824. doi: 10.2196/25824.

本文引用的文献

1
Empowerment through health self-testing apps? Revisiting empowerment as a process.通过健康自测应用程序实现赋权?重新审视赋权这一过程。
Med Health Care Philos. 2023 Mar;26(1):143-152. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10132-w. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
2
Ethico-Political Aspects of Conceptualizing Screening: The Case of Dementia.筛查概念化的伦理政治层面:以痴呆症为例。
Health Care Anal. 2021 Dec;29(4):343-359. doi: 10.1007/s10728-021-00431-3. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
3
Prospective Intention-Based Lifestyle Contracts: mHealth Technology and Responsibility in Healthcare.
基于预期意向的生活方式合同:移动医疗技术与医疗保健中的责任。
Health Care Anal. 2021 Sep;29(3):189-212. doi: 10.1007/s10728-020-00424-8. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
4
The Limits of Empowerment: How to Reframe the Role of mHealth Tools in the Healthcare Ecosystem.赋权的局限性:如何重新构建移动医疗工具在医疗生态系统中的角色。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Jun;26(3):1159-1183. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00115-1. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
5
Mobile health ethics and the expanding role of autonomy.移动健康伦理与自主权的不断扩大的作用。
Med Health Care Philos. 2019 Dec;22(4):623-630. doi: 10.1007/s11019-019-09900-y.
6
Lifestyle interventions to prevent cognitive impairment, dementia and Alzheimer disease.生活方式干预预防认知障碍、痴呆和阿尔茨海默病。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2018 Nov;14(11):653-666. doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0070-3.
7
Digitizing diagnosis: a review of mobile applications in the diagnostic process.数字化诊断:诊断过程中移动应用的综述
Diagnosis (Berl). 2015 Jun 1;2(2):89-96. doi: 10.1515/dx-2014-0068.
8
"Your Brain Matters": Issues of Risk and Responsibility in Online Dementia Prevention Information.“你的大脑很重要”:在线预防痴呆症信息中的风险和责任问题。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Aug;28(10):1539-1551. doi: 10.1177/1049732317732962. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
9
An evaluation of the additional benefit of population screening for dementia beyond a passive case-finding approach.痴呆症人群筛查除了被动病例发现方法之外的附加益处评估。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;32(3):316-323. doi: 10.1002/gps.4466. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
10
Brain health: the importance of recognizing cognitive impairment: an IAGG consensus conference.脑健康:认识认知障碍的重要性:国际老年病学协会共识会议
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Sep 1;16(9):731-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.06.017.