Haywood K L, M Garratt A, Jordan K, Dziedzic K, Dawes P T
Department of Health Sciences and Clinical Evaluation, University of York, York YO1 5DD, UK.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002 Nov;41(11):1295-302. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/41.11.1295.
To assess the acceptability and measurement properties of four ankylosing spondylitis (AS)-specific, patient-assessed measures of health outcome: AS Quality of Life Questionnaire (ASQoL), Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), the Body Chart and the Revised Leeds Disability Questionnaire (RLDQ).
Instruments were administered by means of a self-completed questionnaire to patients recruited from across the United Kingdom (UK). Instruments were assessed for data quality and scaling assumptions. Where appropriate, dimensionality was assessed using principle component analysis (PCA). Internal consistency reliability was tested using Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was assessed in those patients reporting no change in AS-specific health at 2 weeks. The convergent validity of the instruments was assessed and scores were correlated with responses to the health transition questions. Responsiveness was assessed for patients reporting change in health at 6 months.
The BASDAI and Body Chart have low self-completion rates. Item responses for the RLDQ were skewed towards higher levels of functional ability. PCA supported instrument unidimensionality. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.87 (BASDAI) to 0.93 (RLDQ). Test-retest reliability estimates support the use of the ASQoL and RLDQ in individual evaluation (>0.90). Correlations between instruments were in the hypothesized direction; the largest was between the ASQoL and BASDAI (0.79). The BASDAI had the strongest linear relationship, with responses to both specific and general health transition questions (P<0.01). With the exception of the Body Chart, instruments had a stronger relationship with general health transition. The BASDAI was the most responsive instrument. The Body Chart and RLDQ had low levels of responsiveness.
The instruments have undergone a comprehensive comparative evaluation to assess the measurement properties required for patient-assessed measures of health outcome. Adequate levels of reliability and validity were found for all instruments. The BASDAI and the ASQoL were the most responsive to self-perceived change in health, but the BASDAI had low levels of self-completion.
评估四项强直性脊柱炎(AS)特异性、患者自评的健康结局测量指标的可接受性和测量特性,这四项指标分别为:强直性脊柱炎生活质量问卷(ASQoL)、巴斯强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数(BASDAI)、身体图表以及修订版利兹残疾问卷(RLDQ)。
通过自填问卷的方式对从英国各地招募的患者进行这些测量工具的施测。对测量工具进行数据质量和量表假设评估。在适当情况下,使用主成分分析(PCA)评估维度。使用克朗巴哈系数(Cronbach's alpha)检验内部一致性信度。在报告两周内AS特异性健康状况无变化的患者中评估重测信度。评估测量工具的收敛效度,并将得分与健康转变问题的回答进行关联。对报告6个月内健康状况有变化的患者评估反应度。
BASDAI和身体图表的自填率较低。RLDQ的项目回答倾向于较高水平的功能能力。主成分分析支持测量工具的单维度性。克朗巴哈系数范围从0.87(BASDAI)到0.93(RLDQ)。重测信度估计值支持在个体评估中使用ASQoL和RLDQ(>0.90)。测量工具之间的相关性符合假设方向;最大的是ASQoL和BASDAI之间的相关性(0.79)。BASDAI与特定和一般健康转变问题的回答具有最强的线性关系(P<0.01)。除身体图表外,测量工具与一般健康转变的关系更强。BASDAI是反应度最高的测量工具。身体图表和RLDQ的反应度较低。
这些测量工具已经历全面的比较评估,以评估患者自评健康结局测量指标所需的测量特性。所有测量工具均具有足够的信度和效度水平。BASDAI和ASQoL对自我感知的健康变化反应最为灵敏,但BASDAI的自填率较低。