• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

因果森林模型在物质使用障碍心理社会治疗中检验治疗效果异质性的应用。

Application of Causal Forest Model to Examine Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Substance Use Disorder Psychosocial Treatments.

作者信息

Susukida Ryoko, Amin-Esmaeili Masoumeh, Badillo-Goicoechea Elena, Nguyen Trang Q, Stuart Elizabeth A, Rosenblum Michael, Dunn Kelly E, Mojtabai Ramin

机构信息

Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2025 Mar;34(1):e70011. doi: 10.1002/mpr.70011.

DOI:10.1002/mpr.70011
PMID:39729473
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11675088/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) is a concern in substance use disorder (SUD) treatments but has not been rigorously examined. This exploratory study applied a causal forest approach to examine HTE in psychosocial SUD treatments, considering multiple covariates simultaneously.

METHODS

Data from 12 randomized controlled trials of nine psychosocial treatments were obtained from the National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network. Using causal forests, we estimated the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) on drug abstinence. To assess HTE, we compared CATE variance against total outcome variability, conducted an omnibus test, and applied the Rank-Weighted Average Treatment Effect (RATE).

RESULTS

Across nine interventions, CATE variance was lower than total outcome variability, indicating lack of strong evidence of HTE with respect to the baseline covariates considered. The omnibus test and RATE analysis generally support this finding. However, the RATE analysis identified potential HTE in a motivational interviewing trial; this could be a false positive given the multiple analyses; replication is needed to confirm this.

CONCLUSIONS

While causal forests show utility in exploring HTE in SUD interventions, limited baseline assessments in most trials suggest a cautious interpretation. The RATE findings for motivational interviewing highlight potential subgroup-specific treatment benefits, warranting further research.

摘要

目的

治疗效果异质性(HTE)是物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗中的一个关注点,但尚未得到严格检验。这项探索性研究应用因果森林方法来检验心理社会SUD治疗中的HTE,同时考虑多个协变量。

方法

从美国国立药物滥用研究所临床试验网络获得了9种心理社会治疗的12项随机对照试验的数据。使用因果森林,我们估计了药物戒断的条件平均治疗效果(CATE)。为了评估HTE,我们将CATE方差与总结果变异性进行比较,进行了综合检验,并应用了秩加权平均治疗效果(RATE)。

结果

在九种干预措施中,CATE方差低于总结果变异性,表明在所考虑的基线协变量方面缺乏HTE的有力证据。综合检验和RATE分析总体上支持这一发现。然而,RATE分析在一项动机性访谈试验中发现了潜在的HTE;鉴于进行了多次分析,这可能是一个假阳性结果;需要重复研究来证实这一点。

结论

虽然因果森林在探索SUD干预中的HTE方面显示出实用性,但大多数试验中有限的基线评估表明需要谨慎解释。动机性访谈的RATE研究结果突出了潜在的亚组特异性治疗益处,值得进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e35/11675088/4daa5a98bec2/MPR-34-e70011-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e35/11675088/4daa5a98bec2/MPR-34-e70011-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e35/11675088/4daa5a98bec2/MPR-34-e70011-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Application of Causal Forest Model to Examine Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Substance Use Disorder Psychosocial Treatments.因果森林模型在物质使用障碍心理社会治疗中检验治疗效果异质性的应用。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2025 Mar;34(1):e70011. doi: 10.1002/mpr.70011.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Psychosocial interventions for cannabis use disorder.针对大麻使用障碍的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 5;2016(5):CD005336. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005336.pub4.
4
Psychological therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder.创伤后应激障碍及共病物质使用障碍的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD010204. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010204.pub2.
5
Psychosocial interventions for stimulant use disorder.兴奋剂使用障碍的心理社会干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 15;2(2):CD011866. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011866.pub3.
6
Psychosocial interventions for benzodiazepine harmful use, abuse or dependence.针对苯二氮䓬类药物有害使用、滥用或依赖的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(5):CD009652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009652.pub2.
7
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Control interventions in randomised trials among people with mental health disorders.精神障碍患者随机试验中的对照干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4(4):MR000050. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000050.pub2.
10
Psychosocial interventions for pregnant women in outpatient illicit drug treatment programs compared to other interventions.门诊非法药物治疗项目中针对孕妇的心理社会干预与其他干预措施的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 2;2015(4):CD006037. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006037.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Practical Guide to Honest Causal Forests for Identifying Heterogeneous Treatment Effects.用于识别异质治疗效果的诚实因果森林实用指南。
Am J Epidemiol. 2023 Jul 7;192(7):1155-1165. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad043.
2
Patient-derived organoids as a predictive biomarker for treatment response in cancer patients.患者来源的类器官作为癌症患者治疗反应的预测生物标志物。
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2021 Apr 12;5(1):30. doi: 10.1038/s41698-021-00168-1.
3
The evidence landscape in precision medicine.精准医学中的证据格局。
Sci Transl Med. 2020 Apr 22;12(540). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw7745.
4
Effectiveness and treatment moderators of internet interventions for adult problem drinking: An individual patient data meta-analysis of 19 randomised controlled trials.互联网干预成人问题饮酒的有效性和治疗调节因素:19 项随机对照试验的个体患者数据荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Dec 18;15(12):e1002714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002714. eCollection 2018 Dec.
5
Alcohol use severity and age moderate the effects of brief interventions in an emergency department randomized controlled trial.在一项急诊科随机对照试验中,酒精使用严重程度和年龄调节了简短干预的效果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Jan 1;194:386-394. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.10.021. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
6
Racial and ethnic differences in treatment outcomes among adults with stimulant use disorders after a dosed exercise intervention.剂量运动干预后患有兴奋剂使用障碍的成年人治疗结果中的种族和民族差异。
J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2017 Oct-Dec;16(4):495-510. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2017.1317310. Epub 2017 May 19.
7
Moderators of outcome in a technology-based intervention to prevent and reduce problem drinking among adolescents.一项基于技术的干预措施中预防和减少青少年问题饮酒结果的调节因素。
Addict Behav. 2017 Sep;72:64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.03.013. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
8
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Exercise to Health Education for Stimulant Use Disorder: Results From the CTN-0037 STimulant Reduction Intervention Using Dosed Exercise (STRIDE) Study.比较运动与健康教育对兴奋剂使用障碍疗效的随机对照试验:CTN-0037 使用定量运动的兴奋剂减少干预(STRIDE)研究的结果
J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Sep/Oct;78(8):1075-1082. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m10591.
9
Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects.异质因果效应的递归划分
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 5;113(27):7353-60. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510489113.
10
A comparison of African American and Caucasian stimulant users in 12-step facilitation treatment.12步促进疗法中非洲裔美国人和白人兴奋剂使用者的比较。
J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2017 Jul-Sep;16(3):380-399. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2016.1185657. Epub 2016 Jun 13.