Susukida Ryoko, Amin-Esmaeili Masoumeh, Badillo-Goicoechea Elena, Nguyen Trang Q, Stuart Elizabeth A, Rosenblum Michael, Dunn Kelly E, Mojtabai Ramin
Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2025 Mar;34(1):e70011. doi: 10.1002/mpr.70011.
Heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) is a concern in substance use disorder (SUD) treatments but has not been rigorously examined. This exploratory study applied a causal forest approach to examine HTE in psychosocial SUD treatments, considering multiple covariates simultaneously.
Data from 12 randomized controlled trials of nine psychosocial treatments were obtained from the National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network. Using causal forests, we estimated the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) on drug abstinence. To assess HTE, we compared CATE variance against total outcome variability, conducted an omnibus test, and applied the Rank-Weighted Average Treatment Effect (RATE).
Across nine interventions, CATE variance was lower than total outcome variability, indicating lack of strong evidence of HTE with respect to the baseline covariates considered. The omnibus test and RATE analysis generally support this finding. However, the RATE analysis identified potential HTE in a motivational interviewing trial; this could be a false positive given the multiple analyses; replication is needed to confirm this.
While causal forests show utility in exploring HTE in SUD interventions, limited baseline assessments in most trials suggest a cautious interpretation. The RATE findings for motivational interviewing highlight potential subgroup-specific treatment benefits, warranting further research.
治疗效果异质性(HTE)是物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗中的一个关注点,但尚未得到严格检验。这项探索性研究应用因果森林方法来检验心理社会SUD治疗中的HTE,同时考虑多个协变量。
从美国国立药物滥用研究所临床试验网络获得了9种心理社会治疗的12项随机对照试验的数据。使用因果森林,我们估计了药物戒断的条件平均治疗效果(CATE)。为了评估HTE,我们将CATE方差与总结果变异性进行比较,进行了综合检验,并应用了秩加权平均治疗效果(RATE)。
在九种干预措施中,CATE方差低于总结果变异性,表明在所考虑的基线协变量方面缺乏HTE的有力证据。综合检验和RATE分析总体上支持这一发现。然而,RATE分析在一项动机性访谈试验中发现了潜在的HTE;鉴于进行了多次分析,这可能是一个假阳性结果;需要重复研究来证实这一点。
虽然因果森林在探索SUD干预中的HTE方面显示出实用性,但大多数试验中有限的基线评估表明需要谨慎解释。动机性访谈的RATE研究结果突出了潜在的亚组特异性治疗益处,值得进一步研究。