Hendrickson Faith, Hossain M D, Duncan Jacob, Dennis Brody, Hagood Alex, Gardner Taylor, Oldham Eli, Paul Eli, Ford Alicia Ito, Vassar Matt
Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;89:159-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.12.027. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
Emergency medicine remains as the front line of healthcare, providing acute care to a diverse population during urgent and critical moments. Our objective was to systematically quantify the prevalence of data sharing statements (DSS) in high-impact emergency medicine journals and assess their implementation by contacting corresponding authors who indicated data available upon request.
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis to identify the prevalence and content of data sharing statements in clinical studies published in high impact emergency medicine journals between 2018 and 2023, followed by a hierarchical logistic regression analysis to identify variables impacting the incorporation of data sharing statements into emergency medicine studies. Lastly, we conducted a thematic analysis of the data sharing statements extracted from our included sample to identify prevailing themes.
Of the 875 articles reviewed, only 84 (9.6 %) included DSS. DSS prevalence increased over time, from 2.12 % (4/189) in 2018 to 23.71 % (23/97) in 2023. Studies without listed funding sources were significantly less likely to include DSS (estimate = -2.027, p = 0.000). Articles published by BioMed Central (mean effect = 2.497) were more likely to include DSS compared to other publishers. Our review of the DSS content revealed prevailing themes, such as gatekeeper role and conditional data availability, concerning the oversight and regulation of information and the stipulations for data sharing based on certain criteria.
Our study revealed a lack of adherence to DSS, with a slight improvement recently. Listed funding sources and publishers influence DSS presence, highlighting their policy impacts on open science. Our recommendations include increased funding for data sharing, implementation of FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reuse of digital assets) principles, and encouraging DSS inclusion as a publication requirement to enhance transparency and reproducibility, improving patient care. Further research needs to address barriers to data sharing and develop sustainable solutions in a dynamic research environment.
急诊医学仍然是医疗保健的前线,在紧急和关键时刻为不同人群提供急性护理。我们的目标是系统地量化高影响力急诊医学期刊中数据共享声明(DSS)的流行率,并通过联系那些表示可应要求提供数据的通讯作者来评估其实施情况。
我们进行了一项横断面分析,以确定2018年至2023年期间在高影响力急诊医学期刊上发表的临床研究中数据共享声明的流行率和内容,随后进行分层逻辑回归分析,以确定影响将数据共享声明纳入急诊医学研究的变量。最后,我们对从纳入样本中提取的数据共享声明进行了主题分析,以确定主要主题。
在审查的875篇文章中,只有84篇(9.6%)包含DSS。DSS的流行率随时间增加,从2018年的2.12%(4/189)增至2023年的23.71%(23/97)。未列出资金来源的研究纳入DSS的可能性显著更低(估计值=-2.027,p=0.000)。与其他出版商相比,由BioMed Central出版的文章(平均效应=2.497)更有可能包含DSS。我们对DSS内容的审查揭示了一些主要主题,如把关人角色和有条件的数据可用性,涉及信息的监督和管理以及基于某些标准的数据共享规定。
我们的研究表明对DSS的遵守情况不足,近期略有改善。列出的资金来源和出版商影响DSS的存在,突出了它们对开放科学的政策影响。我们的建议包括增加数据共享资金、实施FAIR(数字资产的可查找性、可访问性、互操作性和可重用性)原则,以及鼓励将DSS纳入作为出版要求,以提高透明度和可重复性,改善患者护理。进一步的研究需要解决数据共享的障碍,并在动态研究环境中开发可持续的解决方案。