Suppr超能文献

TPT 10孔和6孔模板的比较。

Comparison of the TPT 10 and 6 hole form board.

作者信息

Russell E W

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1985 Jan;41(1):68-81. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198501)41:1<68::aid-jclp2270410113>3.0.co;2-y.

Abstract

The 10 hole (Adult Version) Tactile Performance Test (TPT) or Form Board is too difficult for patients with moderate to severe brain damage. A series of studies were done to enable an examiner to substitute the simpler 6 hole board (TPT 6 - Child's Version) for such patients. Eighty subjects (61 brain damaged and 19 controls) were given both boards in a counter-balanced order. It was found that: (1) the TPT 10 was inadequate for severe damage; (2) the TPT 6 can be used with severe impairment; (3) a method of prorating blocks into time was developed; (4) the TPT 10 and TPT 6 are strongly correlated; (5) there were no order effects when both boards were given; (6) both boards significantly separated controls from brain-damaged subjects; (7) criteria for substitution of the TPT 6 were established; and (8) comparable scales were established for both boards so that an examiner can substitute either TPT for the other.

摘要

10孔(成人版)触觉表现测试(TPT)或模板板对于中度至重度脑损伤患者来说太难了。已开展了一系列研究,以便检查人员能够为这类患者改用更简单的6孔板(TPT 6 - 儿童版)。80名受试者(61名脑损伤患者和19名对照者)以平衡顺序接受了两种测试板。结果发现:(1)TPT 10对于重度损伤患者并不适用;(2)TPT 6可用于重度损伤患者;(3)开发了一种将积木摆放时间按比例计算的方法;(4)TPT 10和TPT 6高度相关;(5)同时使用两种测试板时不存在顺序效应;(6)两种测试板都能显著区分对照组和脑损伤受试者;(7)确立了TPT 6替代的标准;(8)为两种测试板建立了可比量表,以便检查人员可以用一种TPT替代另一种。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验