Kawaguchi Masaya, Kato Hiroki, Furui Tatsuro, Isobe Masanori, Noda Yoshifumi, Hyodo Fuminori, Miyazaki Tatsuhiko, Matsuo Masayuki
Department of Radiology, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan.
Department of Radiology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, 4-86 Minaminokawacho, Ogaki, 503-0864, Japan.
Jpn J Radiol. 2025 May;43(5):820-828. doi: 10.1007/s11604-024-01727-9. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate MRI findings of ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OEC) as a predictor of histological grade.
This study included 60 patients with histopathologically confirmed OEC (20, 30, and 10 with grades 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Clinical and MRI results were retrospectively reviewed. We compared the following parameters between the three grades: age, tumor markers, presence of uterine corpus cancer, bilaterality, configuration, peritoneal dissemination, abnormal ascites, signal intensities of cystic and solid components, tumor size, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of solid components.
T1-hyperintense cysts were more common in grade 1 than in grades 2-3 OEC (80% vs. 60%, vs. 40%, p < 0.05). The signal intensity ratio between the cystic components with the largest solid component and muscle (1.49 vs. 1.08 vs. 0.98, p < 0.05) was higher in grade 1 than in grades 2-3 OEC. Necrosis within solid components was less common in grade 1 than in grades 2-3 OEC (31% vs. 68% vs. 88%, p < 0.05), and the ADC values of solid components were higher in grade 1 than in grades 2-3 OEC (1.10 vs. 0.99 vs. 0.79 × 10 mm2/sec, p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in other factors.
On T1-weighted images, grade 1 OEC showed a higher signal intensity in the cystic components than grades 2-3 OEC. Necrosis and lower ADC values were more frequently observed in grades 2-3 than in grade 1 OEC.
本研究旨在评估卵巢子宫内膜样癌(OEC)的MRI表现作为组织学分级预测指标的价值。
本研究纳入60例经组织病理学确诊的OEC患者(分别为1级、2级和3级各20例、30例和10例)。对临床及MRI结果进行回顾性分析。我们比较了三个分级之间的以下参数:年龄、肿瘤标志物、子宫体癌的存在情况、双侧性、形态、腹膜播散、异常腹水、囊性和实性成分的信号强度、肿瘤大小以及实性成分的表观扩散系数(ADC)值。
1级OEC中T1高信号囊肿比2 - 3级OEC更常见(80%对60%对40%,p < 0.05)。1级OEC中最大实性成分的囊性成分与肌肉之间的信号强度比(1.49对1.08对0.98,p < 0.05)高于2 - 3级OEC。1级OEC实性成分内的坏死比2 - 3级OEC少见(31%对68%对88%,p < 0.05),且1级OEC实性成分的ADC值高于2 - 3级OEC(1.10对0.99对0.79×10⁻³mm²/sec,p < 0.05)。其他因素无显著差异。
在T1加权图像上,1级OEC的囊性成分信号强度高于2 - 3级OEC。2 - 3级OEC比1级OEC更常出现坏死且ADC值更低。