Suppr超能文献

线性阵列超声内镜在诊断胰腺分裂症方面优于磁共振胰胆管造影:来自东方人群多中心回顾性研究的证据(附视频)

Superiority of linear-array EUS over MRCP in diagnosing pancreas divisum: evidence from a multicenter retrospective study in Oriental cohorts (with video).

作者信息

Mao Yuqing, Ni Jianbo, Peng Kui, Yu Zhonggui, Luo Shengzheng, Xia Youchen, Fu Sengwang, Qu Ying, Xu Kai, Lu Lungen, Gong Xiaoyuan, Zhong Ning, Li Baiwen

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai.

Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Diseases, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Aug;102(2):233-241.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.12.033. Epub 2024 Dec 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Pancreas divisum (PD) is the most common developmental anatomic variant of pancreatic duct. The published data on the accuracy of the detection of PD by means of linear-array endoscopic ultrasound (L-EUS) are limited. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of L-EUS compared with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for identifying PD.

METHODS

Patients who underwent L-EUS for pancreaticobiliary indications and subsequently received endoscopic retrograde pancreatograghy (ERP) treatment were retrospectively evaluated from January 2019 to July 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 1378 patients from 3 tertiary centers were included, of which 120 were diagnosed with PD, as confirmed with the use of ERP, yielding an endoscopic detection rate of 8.7%. L-EUS exhibited a high sensitivity of 90.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.7%-96.0%) and an overall accuracy of 99% (95% CI, 98.5%-99.5%) for the diagnosis of PD. These figures were significantly superior to those of MRCP, which showed a sensitivity of 48.4% (95% CI, 38.1%-58.6%) and an accuracy of 95.4% (95% CI, 93.5%-96.3%) (P < .001). Furthermore, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for PD diagnosis was notably higher for L-EUS (95.7%) compared with MRCP (74.1%) (P < .001). Consistency testing revealed that L-EUS had an excellent kappa value of 0.934, compared with the reference standard of 0.621. Univariate logistic regression analysis identified the presence of pancreatic duct stones, chronic pancreatitis, and severe pancreatitis as potential factors leading to diagnostic failure in detecting PD with the use of L-EUS. Subsequent multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed that the presence of pancreatic duct stones (odds ratio [OR], 5.627; 95% CI, 1.391-22.765) and severe pancreatitis (OR, 12.818; 95% CI, 2.280-72.061) were significantly associated with increased odds of L-EUS diagnostic failure for PD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study conclusively demonstrates that L-EUS significantly outperforms MRCP in diagnosing PD. L-EUS exhibits markedly higher sensitivity and AUC values. However, its diagnostic reliability decreases in the presence of pancreatic duct stones or severe pancreatitis.

摘要

背景与目的

胰腺分裂(PD)是最常见的胰管发育解剖变异。关于线性阵列超声内镜(L-EUS)检测PD准确性的已发表数据有限。本研究旨在评估L-EUS与磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)相比在识别PD方面的诊断准确性。

方法

回顾性评估2019年1月至2023年7月因胰胆疾病接受L-EUS检查并随后接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERP)治疗的患者。

结果

共纳入来自3个三级中心的1378例患者,其中120例经ERP确诊为PD,内镜检出率为8.7%。L-EUS诊断PD的敏感性高达90.8%(95%置信区间[CI],85.7%-96.0%),总体准确率为99%(95%CI,98.5%-99.5%)。这些数据显著优于MRCP,MRCP的敏感性为48.4%(95%CI,38.1%-58.6%),准确率为95.4%(95%CI,93.5%-96.3%)(P<.001)。此外,L-EUS诊断PD的受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下面积(95.7%)显著高于MRCP(74.1%)(P<.001)。一致性检验显示,与参考标准0.621相比,L-EUS的kappa值为0.934,表现出色。单因素逻辑回归分析确定胰管结石、慢性胰腺炎和重症胰腺炎的存在是使用L-EUS检测PD导致诊断失败的潜在因素。随后的多因素逻辑回归分析证实,胰管结石(比值比[OR],5.627;95%CI,1.391-22.765)和重症胰腺炎(OR,12.818;95%CI,2.280-72.061)与L-EUS诊断PD失败的几率增加显著相关。

结论

我们的研究确凿地表明,L-EUS在诊断PD方面明显优于MRCP。L-EUS表现出明显更高的敏感性和AUC值。然而,在存在胰管结石或重症胰腺炎的情况下,其诊断可靠性会降低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验