Suppr超能文献

良心拒服:全球健康视角

Conscientious objection: a global health perspective.

作者信息

Celie Karel-Bart, Symons Xavier, Kochheiser Makayla, Ayala Ruben, Lakhoo Kokila

机构信息

Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, USC Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA

Uehiro Oxford Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Dec 27;9(12):e017555. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017555.

Abstract

Conscientious objection is a critical topic that has been sparsely discussed from a global health perspective, despite its special relevance to our inherently diverse field. In this Analysis paper, we argue that blanket prohibitions of a specific type of non-discriminatory conscientious objection are unjustified in the global health context. We begin both by introducing a nuanced account of conscience that is grounded in moral psychology and by providing an overview of discriminatory and non-discriminatory forms of objection. Next, we point to the frequently neglected but ubiquitous presence of moral uncertainty, which entails a need for epistemic humility-that is, an attitude that acknowledges the possibility one might be wrong. We build two arguments on moral uncertainty. First, if epistemic humility is necessary when dealing with values in theory (as appears to be the consensus in bioethics), then it will be even more necessary when these values are applied in the real world. Second, the emergence of global health from its colonial past requires special awareness of, and resistance to, moral imperialism. Absolutist attitudes towards disagreement are thus incompatible with global health's dual aims of reducing inequity and emerging from colonialism. Indeed, the possibility of global bioethics (which balances respect for plurality with the goal of collective moral progress) hinges on appropriately acknowledging moral uncertainty when faced with inevitable disagreement. This is incompatible with blanket prohibitions of conscientious objection. As a brief final note, we distinguish conscientious objection from the problem of equitable access to care. We note that conflating the two may actually lead to a less equitable picture on the whole. We conclude by recommending that international consensus documents, such as the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, be amended to include nuanced guidelines regarding conscientious objection that can then be used as a template by regional and national policymaking bodies.

摘要

出于良心拒服(医疗职责)是一个关键话题,尽管它与我们这个本质上多元的领域有着特殊关联,但从全球健康的角度来看,对此进行的讨论却很少。在这篇分析论文中,我们认为,在全球健康背景下,全面禁止某一特定类型的非歧视性出于良心拒服(医疗职责)是不合理的。我们首先引入一种基于道德心理学的对良心的细致入微的解释,并概述歧视性和非歧视性的拒服(医疗职责)形式。接下来,我们指出道德不确定性这一经常被忽视但却普遍存在的现象,这需要认知上的谦逊——也就是说,一种承认自己可能犯错的态度。我们基于道德不确定性构建了两个论点。第一,如果在理论上处理价值观时认知谦逊是必要的(这似乎是生物伦理学中的共识),那么在现实世界中应用这些价值观时,它将更加必要。第二,全球健康从其殖民历史中发展而来,这需要对道德帝国主义有特别的认识并加以抵制。因此,对分歧的绝对主义态度与全球健康减少不平等和摆脱殖民主义的双重目标是不相容的。事实上,全球生物伦理学(它在尊重多元性与集体道德进步目标之间取得平衡)的可能性取决于在面对不可避免的分歧时适当地承认道德不确定性。这与全面禁止出于良心拒服(医疗职责)是不相容的。作为最后的简要说明,我们将出于良心拒服(医疗职责)与医疗服务公平可及性问题区分开来。我们指出,将两者混为一谈实际上可能总体上导致一幅更不公平的图景。我们在结论中建议修订国际共识文件,如《生物伦理与人权世界宣言》,以纳入关于出于良心拒服(医疗职责)的细致指导方针,然后区域和国家政策制定机构可以将其用作模板。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d73/11683958/672f497ed42f/bmjgh-9-12-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验